Who is a Jew?

[The_Watchers_2017]

You have not so far, not to anyone in this thread. It was never your purpose here, nor your shadows' purpose. Nor have you displayed a proper understanding of scripture, or experience in a debate, but you have a gold star in division, false doctrine, and lack of evidence. Those attributes are nothing to be desired or proud of.

and yet, Paul shows us the Jews are the Father's Elect.

i don't have to prove anything to you, i just need to see who and what you really are. that much has been established.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

I do not think it is a parable. I don't see it that way. And he is a Jew, yet you tried to argue against that just now. Your deception knows no limits.

you can't read at all. where did i ever post the Rich Man was not a Jew?

SHOW ME?

 

[RichGladden]

you can't read at all. where did i ever post the Rich Man was not a Jew?

SHOW ME?

You posted Lazarus was not a Jew. I said nothing about the rich man. Satan does love to twist things, so why not his children?

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

You posted Lazarus was not a Jew.

prove to me he is a Jew

 

[RichGladden]

and yet, Paul shows us the Jews are the Father's Elect.

i don't have to prove anything to you, i just need to see who and what you really are. that much has been established.

But you can't prove anything. That is the problem here. You prove nothing.....at all.
What Paul is showing and what you are interpreting and not the same. Nor have you been able to prove any of your claims. So enough with the broken record. You are wrong and apparently, it cannot be fixed.

 

[RichGladden]

prove to me he is a Jew

Listen to Andrew Klavan podcasr. He is a Messianic Jew and he taught me much about the story of Lazarus. He also wrote books, one being "The Great Good Thing" about how he came to Christ (which I am sure you are not interested in). He also does Daily Wire with Ben Shapiro a real Jew.......and I am a subscriber! Yes, the Jew you called a Jew hater loves Ben Shapiro!

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

But you can't prove anything. That is the problem here. You prove nothing.....at all.
What Paul is showing and what you are interpreting and not the same. Nor have you been able to prove any of your claims. So enough with the broken record. You are wrong and apparently, it cannot be fixed.

28 As to the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but as to the election they are beloved for the fathers’ sakes:

are not the Jews enemy to the Gospel?
YES

and they are beloved by the Father,


which is why Paul said: 26 and so all Israel shall be saved, as it is written:

 

[RichGladden]

28 As to the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but as to the election they are beloved for the fathers’ sakes:

are not the Jews enemy to the Gospel?
YES

and they are beloved by the Father,


which is why Paul said: 26 and so all Israel shall be saved, as it is written:

Many have tried to steer you right, and you failed to accept their, or my words and proof. You have presented no valid or useful proof to back any, not one, of your many claims including fabrications you made about me. Your conscience is seared. You have no Holy Spirit within you. and you lack understanding of what Paul is saying (you are the blind and hard hearted). You are wrong, you have been wrong, and you will continue to be wrong. Your true purpose here is failing and you know it because your battle is not with me or the others trying to correct and teach you. You are battling against Christ Jesus Himself and you know He has already defeated you. You have failed your mission. It failed before you began.

 

[RichGladden]

28 As to the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but as to the election they are beloved for the fathers’ sakes:

are not the Jews enemy to the Gospel?
YES

and they are beloved by the Father,


which is why Paul said: 26 and so all Israel shall be saved, as it is written:

Your mission has failed. You lost and are lost.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

Listen to Andrew Klavan podcasr. He is a Messianic Jew and he taught me much about the story of Lazarus. He also wrote books, one being "The Great Good Thing" about how he came to Christ (which I am sure you are not interested in). He also does Daily Wire with Ben Shapiro a real Jew.......and I am a subscriber! Yes, the Jew you called a Jew hater loves Ben Shapiro!

i am pasting what most scholars claim.

Who is the rich man in the story of Lazarus?

1. The Rich Man is identified as the Sadducees on similar lines as Cox, noting the Rich Man's high-priestly dress and identifying his five brothers as the five sons of Annas.


Who is Lazarus in the story of the Rich Man?

1.The "beggar" describes both the outcasts of Israel—the "publicans and sinners"—and the Gentiles.
2. Lazarus represents the Gentile nations, who were hungry for the gospel. The rich man represented those who kept the treasure to themselves.
3. 1. The Lazarus of the parable was Eleazar, Abraham's steward (Genesis 15:2). 2. He was a Gentile "of Damascus"
^
theres so many claiming Gentile i won't take all night to list them all.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

Many have tried to steer you right, and you failed to accept their, or my words and proof. You have presented no valid or useful proof to back any, not one, of your many claims including fabrications you made about me. Your conscience is seared. You have no Holy Spirit within you. and you lack understanding of what Paul is saying (you are the blind and hard hearted). You are wrong, you have been wrong, and you will continue to be wrong. Your true purpose here is failing and you know it because your battle is not with me or the others trying to correct and teach you. You are battling against Christ Jesus Himself and you know He has already defeated you. You have failed your mission. It failed before you began.

many have revealed their view of the Jews, most definitely!

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

Your mission has failed. You lost and are lost.

you would not be babbling on and on if i lost.

 

[RichGladden]

i am pasting what most scholars claim.

Who is the rich man in the story of Lazarus?

1. The Rich Man is identified as the Sadducees on similar lines as Cox, noting the Rich Man's high-priestly dress and identifying his five brothers as the five sons of Annas.


Who is Lazarus in the story of the Rich Man?

1.The "beggar" describes both the outcasts of Israel—the "publicans and sinners"—and the Gentiles.
2. Lazarus represents the Gentile nations, who were hungry for the gospel. The rich man represented those who kept the treasure to themselves.
3. 1. The Lazarus of the parable was Eleazar, Abraham's steward (Genesis 15:2). 2. He was a Gentile "of Damascus"
^
theres so many claiming Gentile i won't take all night to list them all.

You lost, and even what you just posted does not prove your claim and you lack the intelligence to realize it. Are you really a child? I m being serious. Are you?

 

[RichGladden]

you would not be babbling on and on if i lost.

I wouldn't? Ever heard of "gloating"?

 

[RichGladden]

i am pasting what most scholars claim.

Who is the rich man in the story of Lazarus?

2. Lazarus represents the Gentile nations, who were hungry for the gospel. The rich man represented those who kept the treasure to themselves.

theres so many claiming Gentile i won't take all night to list them all.

Do you not know what the word "represents" means?

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

You lost, and even what you just posted does not prove your claim and you lack the intelligence to realize it. Are you really a child? I m being serious. Are you?

your source is a radio host and mine are scholars. i am not worried about being wrong here.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

I wouldn't? Ever heard of "gloating"?

you mean glorifying your ignorance?

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

Do you not know what the word "represents" means?

yes, you represent Anderson very well!

 

[RichGladden]

your source is a radio host and mine are scholars. i am not worried about being wrong here.

No need to worry. Just accept it and change to truth and move on. Right now, I remember no time in which you were right. So are you really a child? And if you rely on such good scholars, you should have easily been able to back up your incorrect claims. Now, would you not?

 

[RichGladden]

you mean glorifying your ignorance?

So says the one lacking a shred of documentation to support his winds of doctrines and results to insults because he has not won a case, or presented himself in a good debate form. You lost, buddy, and you are lost.