one moment you want to end any communication towards me and the next you interfere in my conversation with another. make up your mind.Is this not call a thread where anyone can post? Or did you suddenly become god?
one moment you want to end any communication towards me and the next you interfere in my conversation with another. make up your mind.Is this not call a thread where anyone can post? Or did you suddenly become god?
you say that but you have clearly shown the lack of discernment as well as reading comprehension skills ten-year-olds possess. Yet I have no issue with what he has commented and I understand it fully. That would make your assessment faulty as is your hermeneutics.it's called the Gift of Discernment, which those who follow Anderson desperately lack!
I'm still waiting on facts that seem to be coming from anyone but you.one moment you want to end any communication towards me and the next you interfere in my conversation with another. make up your mind.
and i mentioned several pages back he presented facts. but then i also mentioned he deceived followers by not mentioning Romans 11. had that been presented then only those who truly hate the Jews would continue to accept his assertation.you say that but you have clearly shown the lack of discernment as well as reading comprehension skills ten-year-olds possess. Yet I have no issue with what he has commented and I understand it fully. That would make your assessment faulty as is your hermeneutics.
so you are now calling Paul a liar in Romans 11?I'm still waiting on facts that seem to be coming from anyone but you.
You did not present "facts". You presented scripture along with no clear understanding of what they mean. And accusing me of calling Paul a liar? Well that is low even for your sort, but then we know who the accuser is, do we not?so you are now calling Paul a liar in Romans 11?
that's the Facts i have been presenting.
That statement borders on liable. Can you prove it? You may have to!and i mentioned several pages back he presented facts. but then i also mentioned he deceived followers by not mentioning Romans 11. had that been presented then only those who truly hate the Jews would continue to accept his assertation.
my post #184and i mentioned several pages back he presented facts. but then i also mentioned he deceived followers by not mentioning Romans 11. had that been presented then only those who truly hate the Jews would continue to accept his assertation.
they are self explanatory for someone who can comprehend ENGLISH. if you have issue i suggest taking a few courses in Elementary EnglishYou did not present "facts". You presented scripture along with no clear understanding of what they mean. And accusing me of calling Paul a liar? Well that is low even for your sort, but then we know who the accuser is, do we not?
post #184That statement borders on liable. Can you prove it? You may have to!
That is not evidence in fact the lack of. A court would not even consider what you have presented worthy of defense as you can not prove intent!my post #184
i watched the video. the way it is presented it is very compelling. but what was (NEVER) mentioned was what Paul said:
Romans 11:
1 I say then, God has not rejected His people, has He? May it never be! For I too am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.
2 God has not rejected His people whom He knew beforehand.
Romans 11:
25 For I do not want you, brothers and sisters, to be ignorant of this mystery—lest you be wise in your own eyes—that a partial hardening has come upon Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in;
26 and in this way all Israel will be saved, as it is written, “The Deliverer shall come out of Zion. He shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob.
27 And this is My covenant with them, when I take away their sins.”
^
why did Anderson ""purposefully"" not mention this in that video?
almost seems like he is misleading people from the TRUTH!
There is no need. I aced Honors English (2 years) and had two courses in college. I understand it completely and have no issue with what it says, which is not what you say it is.they are self explanatory for someone who can comprehend ENGLISH. if you have issue i suggest taking a few courses in Elementary English![]()
considering Anderson is condemning the Jews, any Scripture vindicating them would most definitely be accepted by the COURT!That is not evidence in fact the lack of. A court would not even consider what you have presented worthy of defense as you can not prove intent!
So you want to accuse a man of a heinous crime based on him NOT mentioning something? Oh yeah, cut and dry case and you know it!post #184
i watched the video. the way it is presented it is very compelling. but what was (NEVER) mentioned was what Paul said:
Romans 11:
1 I say then, God has not rejected His people, has He? May it never be! For I too am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.
2 God has not rejected His people whom He knew beforehand.
Romans 11:
25 For I do not want you, brothers and sisters, to be ignorant of this mystery—lest you be wise in your own eyes—that a partial hardening has come upon Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in;
26 and in this way all Israel will be saved, as it is written, “The Deliverer shall come out of Zion. He shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob.
27 And this is My covenant with them, when I take away their sins.”
^
why did Anderson ""purposefully"" not mention this in that video?
almost seems like he is misleading people from the TRUTH!
ALL of Israel saved means only one thing. there's no other meaning. even someone with an associate degree should understand.There is no need. I aced Honors English (2 years) and had two courses in college. I understand it completely and have no issue with what it says, which is not what you say it is.
And so would defamation of character and liable.considering Anderson is condemning the Jews, any Scripture vindicating them would most definitely be accepted by the COURT!
do you think as a preacher Anderson does not know Romans 11 exists?So you want to accuse a man of a heinous crime based on him NOT mentioning something? Oh yeah, cut and dry case and you know it!
Yes, but you have the wrong definition of Isreal.....period!ALL of Israel saved means only one thing. there's no other meaning. even someone with an associate degree should understand.
that's the point. he is trying to destroy the character of the Jew so anything against him would be accepted.And so would defamation of character and liable.
That is irrelevant to the case of defamation of character or liable.do you think as a preacher Anderson does not know Romans 11 exists?