There you go folks. He's saying believers can forsake God and still be saved. That's the OSAS hoax indeed.You're just being goofy now. Yes, believers can forsake God. But you can't prove that equals loss of salvation.
There you go folks. He's saying believers can forsake God and still be saved. That's the OSAS hoax indeed.You're just being goofy now. Yes, believers can forsake God. But you can't prove that equals loss of salvation.
OSASers say I can NEVER be unsaved! YAY! Wish I could say the same for OSASers.This proves how much you totally FAIL to understand the Bible.
You can forsake God and still be a Christian??????????????????I never said we can’t forsake God.
you should just give up my friend.
Yes you were a dog. Christians can admit that FACT!Nope
Because I am no longer a dog. I was made into a new creature.
DOGS return to vomit because THEY ARE STILL DOGS
If you don't do Christian works you're not Christian.Many people do christian works and do not know Christ.
Stop focusing on works, and fo us on CHrist
Amen! Christianity is a works religion!There you go again, Fail to read, Fail to understand. Stick your foot in your mouth with almost e very post.
I said TRUE faith has TRUE works.
Again, You should give it up..You hate and anger against my faith has destroyed you
So Paul wasn't a Christian?
1 Corinthians 9:27 (NKJV)
27 But I discipline my body and bring it into subjection, lest, when I have preached to others, I myself should become disqualified.
Didn't you bother to read anything I posted? I have already agreed that we can forsake God. So get it already.NONE of that says we can't forsake God!
Are you even conscious? I've already refuted your unbiblical ideas.YAY! OSASers say I can NEVER be unsaved!
If you don't do Christian works you're not Christian.
James "Faith without works is DEAD".
As you know, the proof that election is to salvation is a verse that plainly says so. So all your questions don't help the discussion. What you need are verses that SAY that salvation is to election.
This doesn't support election to salvation.
While you may like to throw in parts of verses, none of this is SAID in Scripture. And that is how to prove your theory.
Of course He does, and none of this is even about election.
No, they were elected to service; all of them. If they were elected to salvation, you need to quote at least one verses that actually says that.
Scripture actually says otherwise; that Judas was also an apostle. I do agree that he was never saved.
Matt 10:2-4
These are the names of the twelve apostles: first, Simon (who is called Peter) and his brother Andrew; James son of Zebedee, and his brother John; Philip and Bartholomew; Thomas and Matthew the tax collector; James son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus; Simon the Zealot and Judas Iscariot, who betrayed him.
He was chosen/elected for that service.
None of God's choosing is to salvation. I have pages of verses that specifically show the purpose of being chosen was to service.
No, the Bible didn't "declare" Judas as a devil, but he was described as a devil. And the bible DOES say that Judas was chosen.
John 6:70-71
70 Then Jesus replied, “Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!”
71 (He meant Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot, who, though one of the Twelve, was later to betray him.)
Fulfilling prophecy IS service. It's ok to admit it.
I don't think he believed at all. He was an opportunist.
Unless you can find and quote a verse that clearly shows election to salvation, you don't have a point.
You are trying to "connect the dots" that aren't connected.
I can show you pages of verses that clearly show election to service.
Well, thanks for demonstrating your coma. I have already quoted both verses to you and pointed out what they SAY. And you come back with this nonsense about your childish insinuation that it's "too much trouble to quote Scripture for" you.Too much trouble to quote Scripture for us? Let me help you again.
Did you take the time to actually read with comprehension this passage??Hebrews 6:4-8 (NKJV)
4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit (Christians), 5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 if they fall away, to renew them again to repentance, since they crucify again for themselves the Son of God, and put Him to an open shame. 7 For the earth which drinks in the rain that often comes upon it, and bears herbs useful for those by whom it is cultivated, receives blessing from God; 8 but if it bears thorns and briars, it is rejected and near to being cursed, whose end is to be burned.
See post 3833. This passage was compared with 1 Cor 3:12-15 and totally refutes your opinions.Hebrews 6:4-8 (NKJV)
4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit (Christians), 5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 if they fall away, to renew them again to repentance, since they crucify again for themselves the Son of God, and put Him to an open shame. 7 For the earth which drinks in the rain that often comes upon it, and bears herbs useful for those by whom it is cultivated, receives blessing from God; 8 but if it bears thorns and briars, it is rejected and near to being cursed, whose end is to be burned.
You have no exuse whatsoever. But you are free to keep producing works of the flesh. They will ALL be burned up.There you go folks. He's saying believers can forsake God and still be saved. That's the OSAS hoax indeed.
FreeGrace2 said:
Wanna bet? I have challenged her, and now YOU to provide verses that plainly state each point. That means 1 verse per point, not 1 verse that states all 5 points.
Once each of you shows that you can't do that, I will provide verses that plainly refute each of the 5 points. That is, if you claim the 5th point is about perseverance. If you think it is preservation (eternal security), then I'm fully on board with that.
OK, so you believe that it is a waste of time to prove your view is biblical. That is weird indeed.
Rather, this kind of loose talk is from those who know they can't defend their points or views. So they don't.
Nice cheap shot.
So, you've already checked out on trying to prove the 5 points of calvinism are biblical.
Now, once Beckie checks out without any verses, I will provide clear verses that refute each point.
You are in no position to judge my heart. The Lord alone does that. Your judging is anti-biblical.
Well, I'm glad you decided to take my challenge. Thank you for that. However, I've never "tried to use God's Word against itself". That is a bogus charge.
I DO use God's Word against the claims of those who misuse God's Word.
Ok, let's stop here. Rom 3:10-18 is a series of 6 OT quotes. Paul sets the fact in v.9: all are under sin. Then, he begins to quote 6 different OT passages/verses to demonstrate the various ways all people sin.
Do you seriously think that every human being is guilty of EVERY verse from 10-18??
v.10-11 quotes Psa 14:1-3 directly. The subject of that passage? Atheists. Of course they "don't seek God". But there are verses that acknowledge that people DO seek God.
Acts 17:27 - God did this so that they would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from any one of us. Doesn't sound very calvinistic, does it.
Heb 11:6 - And without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who comes to him must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly seek him. Still doesn't sound very calvinistic, does it.
So, I have used God's Word to REFUTE the calvinist claim that no one seeks God. Atheists don't.
None of these potentials prove the calvinist claim about total depravity.
The biblical view of total depravity is simply that man is unable to save himself. Period. That's it.
But calvinism goes too far and claim that man is unable to believe on his own. But calvinism has no verses that say what they claim.
I have not used God's Word against God's Word. I have used God's Word to reveal that calvin's claim about total depravity isn't found in the Bible.
OK, on to the next point: unconditional election to salvation.
You should begin with believing Scripture. Start with John 5:24 and John 10:28 and then see the clear parallel between Heb 6:4-9 and 1 Cor 3:12-15.OSASers say I can NEVER be unsaved! YAY! Wish I could say the same for OSASers.
No problem. The point was that Jesus did elect/choose Judas as the betrayer. That is election to service.Sorry about John 6:70. I did the Greek off the top of my head and thought the Greek word for Demon was used here but it is actually the Greek Word for Devil - Diablos.
Yes! That's my point about Eph 1:4. God has chosen "us in Him". That IS believers. In fact, v.19 defines "us" as "us who BELIEVE".You still need to answer the questions posed in my previous post. You may say God having chosen is to "service" and read the verses that way but are not these verses to service for the ones who are saved?
Nope. Then Judas was saved. That is pure nonsense. And that would mean EVERY JEW in the OT was saved.Therefore - being chose to serve is equal to being chosen to Salvation.
Ask Judas. Ask every Jew from the OT. You have to understand that God's plan calls for His will to be done. And He chooses/elects who He determines who will advance His plan.How can one be of service to God - if that one is not a part of God's salvation?
What does that even mean? John 6:70 is clear enough. So is the chosen nation of Israel.Service to God apart from Salvation would be in name only.
You've just got to be kidding!!! Seriously???For example - Judas - was chosen to fulfill the prophecies. He therefore, served a purpose but he was not in the service of God.
This isn't about how the "chosen ones" think about it, or their desire. It's about God's plan, plain and simple.When one is Regenerated and Converted, that one desires to serve God and the cause of Christ but one, such as Judas, was "used" by God but he had no true desire to serve the Lord.
Fire away. I've never avoided answering any question.If you are going to defend your view, then you must answer the questions posed to you. Making claims and yet, not answering the oppositions questions, proves you do not have a good foundation for you doctrine.
Typical error here. Revealed by your statement: "as having 7 effects on all of mankind". iow, you are taking Rom 3:10-18 as what "all of mankind" are guilty of".So I repeat:
Let's begin shall we? Scripture declares the following about Depravity:
Rom 3:9 What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we before laid to the charge both of Jews and Greeks, that they are all under sin;
Rom 3:10 as it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one;
Rom 3:11 There is none that has understanding, There is none that is seeking after God;
Rom 3:12 They have all turned aside, they are together become unprofitable; There is none that doeth good, no, not so much as one:
Therefore, the subject of Depravity is described here, as having 7 effects on all of mankind. They are:
1.) ALL are under sin.
2.) None is Righteous.
3.) None has Understanding about the things of God. Obviously man understands somethings: Sciences, philosophy, medicine...etc.
4.) None is seeking after God.
5.) ALL turned aside from God.
6.) ALL became worthless.
7.) None do acts of Good (From God's perspective), NO NOT ONE.
NO. The indictment came in v.9. And repeated in v.23. Again, v.10-18 are EXAMPLES of how mankind sins.Are these six points, not what the Word of God says? In particular, do not these verses place ALL under these indictments?
OK, let's examine the first quote Paul took from the OT; Psa 14:1-3If not - How not? Does the word "none" mean none - does the word "all" mean all?
Since your premise was extremely OFF THE RAILS, these questions are irrelevant.Please then give answer to the following questions: Reposted -
Several questions then arise from these indictments, as to how mankind can achieve Salvation or believe on Christ or Trust God?
1.) If all are under sin and love sin - Then why would they, of their own accord, desire to pursue righteousness?
2.) If none has understanding, about the things of God - Then how can that person ever come to understand the danger they are in?
3.) If none are seeking after God - Then how does one go from that condition, to a condition that desires and seeks God?
4.) If all have turned aside - Then how do they turnback? Through understanding spiritual things and searching after God. BUT WAIT - There is that little problem of none having understanding and none are seeking.
5.) If all are unprofitable or worthless - Then how does that condition change?
6.) If none is doing GOOD but yet we think we are - How does this message penetrate the depraved mind?
Yes, disqualified clearly means LOST!Yes, Paul was a Christian. His being "disqualified" did not pertain to the possibility of Paul losing his salvation but of failing in his role/responsibility/duty as a disciple/preacher of the gospel of/for Christ, and thereby becoming disqualified (theoretically) in that sense. If you look at the preceding verses, I think you will see that his preaching of the gospel was the subject at-hand, not his salvation. Of course, that disqualification never occurred.