I am well aware that the Lord hates the shedding of innocent blood. However, we are talking about killing animals, which is a distinct subject.
Do animals have innocent blood?
I am well aware that the Lord hates the shedding of innocent blood. However, we are talking about killing animals, which is a distinct subject.
No, the killing of animals is unlawful, and not the Will of the Father.
The commandment: "Thou shalt not commit adultery." not only prohibits humans from commiting adultery with humans, but it also prohibits bestiality. So, in like manner, the commandment: " Thou shalt not kill." not only prohibits the killing of humans, but it also prohibits the killing of animals. The commandments are not just talking about humans. That is why both bestiality and the killing of animals are unlawful.
-The killing of an ox is equated to murder, both are abominations:
Isaiah 66:3 He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a man; he that sacrificeth a lamb, as if he cut off a dog's neck; he that offereth an oblation, as if he offered swine's blood; he that burneth incense, as if he blessed an idol. Yea, they have chosen their own ways, and their soul delighteth in their abominations.
1 John 3:15 Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.
Revelation 13:10 He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.
-And food is not an excuse for murder, because the Father gave us the herbs and fruit for food, not animals:
Genesis 1:29 And God said, “See, I have given you every herb that yields seed which is on the face of all the earth, and every tree whose fruit yields seed; to you it shall be for food.
-There is also the abomination which the Lord hates: shedding the innocent blood of the animals:
Proverbs 6:16 These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
-The Father doesn't want us killing each other:
Isaiah 65:25The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the Lord.
Revelation 13:10 He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.
Jeremiah 15:2 And when they ask you, ‘Where shall we go?’ you shall say to them, ‘Thus says the Lord: “‘Those who are for pestilence, to pestilence, and those who are for the sword, to the sword; those who are for famine, to famine, and those who are for captivity, to captivity.’
Isaiah 33:1 Ah, you destroyer, who yourself have not been destroyed, you traitor, whom none has betrayed! When you have ceased to destroy, you will be destroyed; and when you have finished betraying, they will betray you.
Matthew 7:12 So whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets.
So, tell us, if he forbade them from touching dead bodies, how could they skin them, cut them, cook them and eat them, without touching them?
They are not food. The herbs and fruits are food since the beginning, and God can't change. Neither the Law changes. So, why would you shed innocent blood, when you have herbs and fruits for food? -It isn't necessary to shed innocent blood, you do it because you lust after flesh, and are not contented with the food Father gave you. Let it be known, whosoever tastes flesh, eats the body of death.
Now, I will show you how killing animals is a transgression, specifically murder:
1. Humans and animals are brothers of the same Father, they were made by the same Hand, with the same dust, and share the same "breath of Life":
Ecclesiastes 3:18 I said in mine heart concerning the estate of the sons of men, that God might manifest them, and that they might see that they themselves are beasts.
19 For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing befalleth them: as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man hath no preeminence above a beast: for all is vanity.
20 All go unto one place; all are of the dust, and all turn to dust again.
-Because of this, killing an animal is equated as killing a man, since the same breath that is found in man, is also found in animals:
Isaiah 66:3 He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a man; he that sacrificeth a lamb, as if he cut off a dog's neck; [...]
-Making it a transgression against the Breath of the Father. Murder, because humans and animals are brothers of the same Father.
Matthew 25:37 Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?
40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
-You see they ask Him: when have we saw you? No man can see God, so He was talking about all creatures, even the least of these, because God is present in all Life forms, so doing it to any creature is doing it to Him.
You have to decide if you believe Abel was righteous, or if you believe he shed innocent blood, you can't have both.
Is not the KJV 1611 Scripture, the Bible? Or is it only part Scripture, part "not Scripture"? Are you partially rejecting the KJV 1611, and the Latin Vulgate, and the Septuagint? Anyways, do you actually believe the Law changes? Can murder be "legalized"?
That is not what it is written, He made coats of skins, you are assuming He kill the animals, it could have been wool of sheeps, or maybe the animals died of natural causes.
1. Jesus cannot sin.
2. Shedding innocent blood is sin.
3. Jesus cannot shed innocent blood.
The Lord hates hands that shed innocent blood:
Proverbs 6:16 These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
That statement contradicts the Bible as well as the will of the Father.No, the killing of animals is unlawful, and not the Will of the Father.
No, the killing of animals is unlawful, and not the Will of the Father.
The commandment: "Thou shalt not commit adultery." not only prohibits humans from commiting adultery with humans, but it also prohibits bestiality. So, in like manner, the commandment: " Thou shalt not kill." not only prohibits the killing of humans, but it also prohibits the killing of animals. The commandments are not just talking about humans. That is why both bestiality and the killing of animals are unlawful.
-The killing of an ox is equated to murder, both are abominations:
Isaiah 66:3 He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a man; he that sacrificeth a lamb, as if he cut off a dog's neck; he that offereth an oblation, as if he offered swine's blood; he that burneth incense, as if he blessed an idol. Yea, they have chosen their own ways, and their soul delighteth in their abominations.
1 John 3:15 Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.
Revelation 13:10 He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.
-And food is not an excuse for murder, because the Father gave us the herbs and fruit for food, not animals:
Genesis 1:29 And God said, “See, I have given you every herb that yields seed which is on the face of all the earth, and every tree whose fruit yields seed; to you it shall be for food.
-There is also the abomination which the Lord hates: shedding the innocent blood of the animals:
Proverbs 6:16 These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
-The Father doesn't want us killing each other:
Isaiah 65:25The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the Lord.
Abel was righteous and in fact because Abel was good and because God showed favor upon Abel's sacrifice of the blood of his flock but did not show favor on Cain's sacrifice of the plants, Cain became wroth with his brother Abel just because Abel was good, and so Cain slew him. This is the first time innocent blood was shed and the lady of the earth drank Abel's innocent blood.
Do animals have innocent blood?
not the first.
remember the garments God made for Adam & Eve -- and isn't this what Abel was doing? commemorating that first sacrifice God, their priest, made for them, to cover their shame?
The thing with this is that is God, God can do anything he wants, so it's not the best example when wondering if it is ethical for mankind to kill animals. On specifically mankind killing animals, Abel is the first mention of this action.
The sacrifices made by the brothers Abel and Cain is also the first-time man is recorded as making a sacrifice to God. It is not a commemoration, but rather both brothers are making an offering. The offering comes out of their possession and substance. One brother, Abel, is a keeper of sheep, so he offers the best of the flock as a sacrifice. Cain is a tender of plants, so he offers the plants which he tends. God has favor to Abel's sacrifice, but not to Cain's. Abel's sacrifice is more genuine, he is bearing a real loss, literally, making a real sacrifice, by giving the best and the first of his flock, showing that he has much faith in the God.
Abel's sacrifice is more genuine, he is bearing a real loss, literally, making a real sacrifice, by giving the best and the first of his flock, showing that he has much faith in the God.
if Cain also brings the produce from his own work, why does God have regard for Abel's but not his?
what makes Abel's sacrifice 'more genuine' than Cain's if both are offering the things of their own labors?
where would the brothers have gotten the idea to do this, if it is not a commemoration?
if Abel had the idea himself to kill and dissect a lamb, which he does not use for food, why does God have regard for that?
On specifically mankind killing animals, Abel is the first mention of this action.
Abel offered the first of his flock, the goodliest. This is a more genuine sacrifice as Abel is giving up something of high value and importance out of his possessions. Apart from the earthly show of it, spiritually it shows Abel has a lot of faith in God because he is willing to give up, literally sacrifice, the very best thing he has in his earthly possessions.
Well the brothers were not born yet when God made the coats of skins for Adam and Eve, so that's one point. Another point is the text says it is an offering and says both brothers came and gave offerings of their possessions to the Lord. God has regard for Abel's sacrifice because it is a more excellent sacrifice, it is a more genuine sacrifice. If you think about what it means to sacrifice past the superficial ritual of it, and look into the deeper things of sacrifice, it means to give something up of high value to you. Abel's offering was more in the spirit of sacrifice. Abel is showing through his action of sacrificing the best of his flock that he trusts God, he has faith in God, this sacrifice and action shows that God is more important to him than the things of the earth for he is willing to give up the very best thing he owns in this earth in order to give an offering to God.
To return to the topic, Abel may well have eaten meat before this, he was a tender of animals, and he obviously knows how to slaughter and prepare an animal. God gave man possession of the earth and all the creations in it. Though in fairness it never does say pointblank Abel ate meat, but nevertheless he is certainly the first person to kill an animal, and it was not regarded as a sin by God, but rather, it was regarded highly by God, not that God needs anything material in this world which he himself created by his Word (Jesus), but it shows both faith and love for God, which is what God enjoys.
how many times did Cain and Abel bring an offering to God?
was the account in Genesis 4:3-5 the first time?
what does it mean, "in the process of time" ((v.3)) -- was it a certain day? what day?
is this wholly disconnected from Genesis 3, or is it connected?
why does God put this event directly after Genesis 3?
why is this the very next thing we need to know?
To return to the topic, Abel may well have eaten meat before this, he was a tender of animals, and he obviously knows how to slaughter and prepare an animal. God gave man possession of the earth and all the creations in it. Though in fairness it never does say pointblank Abel ate meat, but nevertheless he is certainly the first person to kill an animal, and it was not regarded as a sin by God, but rather, it was regarded highly by God
Has not the same Father made out of the same dust, both the animals and your childreen, who also serve you? And don't they have the same Breath of Life, which both received from the same Father?God made the animals and put them into the possession of man. It is not murder to do what you want with what is yours.
What is the sin of the lamb? Why don't they constitute innocent blood? What does then?The animals do not constitute innocent blood, the animals are possessions in the stewardship of man.
You can't have righteous shedding of innocent blood, it is not compatible:God showed favor upon Abel's sacrifice of the blood
This Bible?That statement contradicts the Bible as well as the will of the Father.
Sometimes you have to trust your faith more than your eyes. Because if you had truly believed shedding innocent blood is an abomination, then it would follow that Jesus cannot shed innocent blood, because He cannot sin. And what you believe depends on whether you are a sheep or not, and if you hear His voice or the voice of strangers:why is He doing this to these fish if it is an abomination?
Yes, but not the physical carnal red blood:do we eat His flesh and drink His blood?
If you believe Abel was righteous, then ir follows he didn't shed innocent blood. However, Cain was a murderer, so you may have the sacrifices confused, if you get what I'm saying..Abel was unlawfully killing and eating lambs?