You say you are not an expert but you tell me what it is?Could be the Zionism Movement or the Messianic Movement - or both. Honestly I'm no expert on that. Bottom line is, this is a global revival of the Jewish people.
You say you are not an expert but you tell me what it is?Could be the Zionism Movement or the Messianic Movement - or both. Honestly I'm no expert on that. Bottom line is, this is a global revival of the Jewish people.
Mar 13:28 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When her branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is near:
Mar 13:29 So ye in like manner, when ye shall see these things come to pass, know that it is nigh, even at the doors.
Mar 13:30 Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.
Mar 13:31 Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away.
Jesus still said Mar 13:30 Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.
Israel , The Jews, the earthly children of Abraham. Which ever label folks prefer, was no longer tender at the time of Christ. The Church, the body of Christ , the Christians were.Could be the Zionism Movement or the Messianic Movement - or both. Honestly I'm no expert on that. Bottom line is, this is a global revival of the Jewish people.
You say you are not an expert but you tell me what it is?
Why do you add 'the antichrist' What is the Biblical meaning of antichrist .. the answer is in Johns lettersThe generation that will be alive when the Antichrist is revealed?
I understand we just aint gonna agreeI was asking you about "these things". The completion of "these things" was the hard condition for "this generation" to subsist, no? So unless we understand what "these things", specifically the fig tree, we ain't gonna understand who are "this generation".
That Wicked, Son of Perdition. Abomination of Desolation. Several names, same dude.Why do you add 'the antichrist' What is the Biblical meaning of antichrist .. the answer is in Johns letters
I understand we just aint gonna agree
Again i ask what is the Biblical definition of antichrist. Who is man to change the Word of God to suit his understanding?That Wicked, Son of Perdition. Abomination of Desolation. Several names, same dude.
The problem is when people try to interpret the parable first instead of taking the clear statement first and interpreting the parable through it.This parable is of paramount importance regarding the end times, it was recorded in almost identical words in all three synoptic gospels. If you don't understand this parable, you're not gonna truly understand that seemingly "clear" statement, because "these things" are directly referring to the "budding" of the fig tree.
To the contrary, in the state of Israel is to be found the house of Judah, which consists of the tribe of Judah, the tribe of Benjamin, and much of the tribe of Levi. Who together have become known as the Jews. The Lord will yet bring the houses of Israel and Judah together, in a new covenant, and make them one.That which calls itself "Israel" today has no real connection to OT Israel. God completely destroyed that nation in A.D. 70 (the "power of the holy people" was "completely shattered"). Peter wrote: "The end of ALL things is AT HAND" (1 Peter 4:7). He spoke of the end of the Old Covenant age the things pertaining to it.
Again i ask what is the Biblical definition of antichrist. Who is man to change the Word of God to suit his understanding?
The problem is when people try to interpret the parable first instead of taking the clear statement first and interpreting the parable through it.
It's a principle of hermeneutics to interpret the unclear by what is clear, rather than the other way around.
I couldn't disagree more. Parables are inherently unclear; Jesus had to explain them to the disciples. The Olivet discourse was plain speech, to be taken directly rather than parsed through some other lens. If you start with the parable, you're violating the principle.That principle doesn't apply on references. These references direct you to other places in the bible, and you go there. In this case it's right there, the three previous verses. Both the fig tree parable and that statement are unclear to a certain degree, but the fig tree parable is CLEARER than that statement - if you've learned the symbolism of the fig tree. You ignore that context, parsing a reference like "these things" only makes what's clear UNclear.
I couldn't disagree more. Parables are inherently unclear; Jesus had to explain them to the disciples. The Olivet discourse was plain speech, to be taken directly rather than parsed through some other lens. If you start with the parable, you're violating the principle.
I think there will be two, one false messiah and one false Elijah, aka the Sea Beast and the Earth Beast.
When he said ....Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming ... it is because they had heard the teaching of that Wicked that would be revealed, the son of perdition, the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel the Prophet, which had been called the Antichrist by that time and was a common teaching among them.Again i ask what is the Biblical definition of antichrist. Who is man to change the Word of God to suit his understanding?
Again i ask what is the Biblical definition of antichrist. Who is man to change the Word of God to suit his understanding?
I think there will be two, one false messiah and one false Elijah, aka the Sea Beast and the Earth Beast. From what I know, Jews have been expecting a reincarnation of Elijah. You remember at the beginning of the gospel of John, Pharisees sent some men to ask about the identity of John the Baptist, and they asked if he was Elijah. Till this day there's still a tradition in many Jewish families to leave an empty chair at the dinner table for Elijah. But behold, when this fella comes, he's gonna be a reincarnation of Judas, not Elijah, and he'll sell all of us out to the false messiah. That's the real Man of Sin/the Lawless One in 2 Thess. 2:3.