The priests indeed receive such offering as reconciliation of the worshippers for the trespasses against the law
of Moses, but for sins agains the Law of God there can be no remission, save by repentance and amendment.
Welcome!
The priests indeed receive such offering as reconciliation of the worshippers for the trespasses against the law
of Moses, but for sins agains the Law of God there can be no remission, save by repentance and amendment.
shed blood of Jesus Christ.
The passages also refer to the abomination of shedding innocent blood, that it cannot take away sin:
Proverbs 6:16 These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
Are you against Christ’s sacrifice on the cross?
I am against blood sacrifices. Jesus on the Cross wasn't a blood sacrifice, It was a real sacrifice:
Psalm 51:17 The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise.
blood of Christ
Deuteronomy 19:15 One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.
You have to do better than that, I presented you with: Samuel, Hosea, Jesus, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Solomon.
Would you explain, Perhaps I need to make a deeper study of scripture?I do not see a conflict with the Word i see conflict in your view
The first chapter of Isaiah discusses this. The Jews were using the sacrificial system that was given to them for forgiveness of their sins the same way the pagans were making sacrifices to idols----to feed God, not as God asked them to sacrificeThe passages also refer to the abomination of shedding innocent blood, that it cannot take away sin:
Proverbs 6:16 These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
Perhaps I need to make a deeper study of scripture? Really? do you really think you need deeper study?Would you explain, Perhaps I need to make a deeper study of scripture?
What a strange answer to asking you to clear up your post indicating you thought my post incorrect. Do you or don't you agree with my posts, and if you disagree tell me why.Perhaps I need to make a deeper study of scripture? Really? do you really think you need deeper study?
washed us from our sins in his own blood
for 4,000 years there was no forgiveness of sin?
I do not see how my post disagree with any of this unless you are telling the Lord he should not have used the fleshly commands to symbolized the spiritual. Christ changed that, and we were given the holy spirit.His Blood is Spirit and it is Life:
John 6:56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
If you drink His Doctrine, His Word and His Truth, you will confess and forsake, He will forgive and cleanse you from all unrighteousness.
Not by carnal blood, but by Spirit and Life.
Yes, there was the same forgiveness as today, because the LORD does not change: Repentance and ammendment:
Ezekiel 18:21 But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die.
27 Again, when the wicked man turneth away from his wickedness that he hath committed, and doeth that which is lawful and right, he shall save his soul alive.
Ezekiel 33:14 Again, when I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; if he turn from his sin, and do that which is lawful and right;
15 If the wicked restore the pledge, give again that he had robbed, walk in the statutes of life, without committing iniquity; he shall surely live, he shall not die.
19 But if the wicked turn from his wickedness, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall live thereby.
How about quoting the whole sentence instead of a selective and misleading part. That's dishonest.How?
I was asking a question in response to a statement regarding division. You present it as a statement, not a question. Anyone reading your quote would believe that I claim that the Corinthians were not Christians. That is not what I said.How about quoting the whole sentence instead of a selective and misleading part. That's dishonest.
This request is honest suggesting you need deeper Bible study was disingenuous.What a strange answer to asking you to clear up your post indicating you thought my post incorrect. Do you or don't you agree with my posts, and if you disagree tell me why.
AgreeThe Lord gave us scripture, both the four gospels and the letters. The :Lord wants us to learn from and believe in all these scripture he gave us.
The whole of His Word is Truth. You see huge differences i dont. Just what are some of the huge differences of truth you see in the Word?There is a huge difference between the truths of the gospels and the truths of the letters.
Is there not doctrine in the Gospels and the Gospel in Letters? I would guess you find Christ many places in the OT . It is one book one Bible one Word...We read the letters to learn doctrine and all about Christ, we read the gospel
Agree
The whole of His Word is Truth. You see huge differences i dont. Just what are some of the huge differences of truth you see in the Word?
The gospels are Christ telling us how to live for Him and the letters tells us about Christ.
We are to be disciples of Christ, and that means a big change in our outlook and living. Peter explained it when he said in Matt. 19:27 Peter answered him, “We have left everything to follow you!
Is there not doctrine in the Gospels and the Gospel in Letters? I would guess you find Christ many places in the OT . It is one book one Bible one Word...
Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Joh 1:2 The same was in the beginning with God.
Joh 1:3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
Joh 1:4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
Seems we just see things a bit differently ..
When I retired over 30 years ago I began spending several hours a day in bible study. I do not study the study the doctrines of men, I keep to strictly study of scripture. Now how about you, what is your background of scripture study?This request is honest suggesting you need deeper Bible study was disingenuous.