No verse should be taken in isolation. Yes it does appear from the order of words in this verse that baptism is necessary for the remission of sins. And if we stopped right there and failed to take the total Gospel message into account we would conclude that that is the case. But is it? Not if you take other Scriptures into account.
THE WORDS OF CHRIST IN LUKE 24 DO NOT INCLUDE BAPTISM
Jesus said: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. (Lk 24:47) It is both logical and spiritually sound to believe that it is repentance which leads to the remission of sins. The narrative of Zacchaeus confirms this. When he repented of his sins Christ said that salvation had come to his house. Also, when we go all the way back to the book of Jonah we see the connection between repentance and remission of sins.
THE WORDS OF PETER IN ACTS 3 DO NOT INCLUDED BAPTISM
Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; (Acts 3:19) Here Peter includes the necessity of both repentance and conversion in order for sins to be blotted out. Which is what the remission of sins means.
THE WORDS OF PAUL IN ACTS 20 DO NOT INCLUDE BAPTISM
And how I kept back nothing that was profitable unto you, but have shewed you, and have taught you publickly, and from house to house, Testifying both to the Jews, and also to the Greeks, repentance toward God, and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ. (Acts 20:20,21) Indeed Paul stated elsewhere that he was not sent to baptize but to preach the Gospel. Had baptism been necessary for the remission of sins he could not have said that.
So the purpose of water baptism, as already mentioned, is the full identification of the believer with the death. burial, and resurrection of Christ. There are also other aspects of baptism which are just as important, but we can discuss those separately. But we should not mislead people into thinking that baptism washes away sins. And here we have the example of the repentant thief on the cross, who died shortly after his confession of faith.
So why did Peter juxtapose baptism with both the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Ghost? Because in his mind's eye the one who repents and believes is baptized immediately or almost immediately. And that is the pattern which we find in Acts.
so your point is places in scriptire don’t mention baptism ? Yeah I agree that’s why we need to accept it all.
To know what baptism means and is for lol we would want to find the scriptures that do mention it wouldn’t we ?
“No verse should be taken in isolation. Yes it does appear from the order of words in this verse that baptism is necessary for the remission of sins.”
yeah I agree that’s ya why I’ve offered many Saying the same thing before the cross after the cross tonjews and gentiles . Sort of my point exactly.
pauls words don’t negate peters , Paul is just another apostle no more, no less.
We should look to what Jesus did and said that’s how the rest makes sense . And it’s what all of the apostles believed and witnessed.
Nothing Paul says in his letters change what’s already stated and made perfectly clear. we can find many scripture that doesn’t mention Jesus death or resurrection also but does that change the truth of those that do ?
“And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and
preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.”
Mark 16:15-16 KJV
that’s always going to be true. It’s true for Jew and gentile yesterday today and forever That’s always going to be the case. It doesn’t say “ anyone who doesn’t get baptized is lost “ it’s faith it invites
belief and action
you are the one who pointed to what Peter said at pentocost and in the house of Cornelius and both support baptism which was your point but at the same time now you are making an argument against what he said it is for ?
For example this
“for this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.”
Matthew 26:28 KJV
doesn’t mean baptism isn’t about remission of sins. This
“and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.”
Luke 24:47
doesn’t change baptism for remission of sins . this
“To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.”
Acts 10:43 KJV
doesn’t change baptism for remission of sins . this
“whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;”
Romans 3:25 KJV
None of those or any other bearers change what baptism is for in anyway because
they aren’t teaching baptism in those verses thier witnessing belief in Christ who died for remission of sins.
If we want to know what baptism in water is for we need to read the verses that explain it not the ones that don’t mention it that’s just a diversion.
Baptism in water has always been the same beforehand in the beginning of the gospel
“
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; As it is written in the prophets, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, Which shall
prepare thy way before thee. The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, Make his paths straight. John did baptize in the wilderness, and
preach the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins.”
Mark 1:1-4 KJV
that message of remission is the whole poo t of baptism
“And there went out unto him
all the land of Judæa, and they of Jerusalem, and were all baptized of him in the river of Jordan, confessing their sins.”
Mark 1:5 KJV
after Jesus she’s his blood of remission according to his words in the gospel to both the Jews
“Then Peter said unto them,
Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins,
and ye shall
receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.”
Acts 2:38 KJV
they do it because they believe and also gentile
“
While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.
And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that
on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.
…
Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
And
he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.”
Acts 10:44-45, 47-48
Because Peter doesn’t specifically say “ for remission of sins “ doesn’t change anything of that was the case the Bible would just be one verse that always said the same thing
whe. Paul was converted to the church the first thing he did was get baptized and start preaching that Jesus is the son of God the promised messiah who would die for sins and be raised up again. This again doesn’t change anything regarding baptism
when we say I believe it doesn’t excuse us from doing what he said to do it means we believe and will do it because we do believe he is the one we then get baptized in his name who died for our sins. Once you learn something then after you add to it you don’t remove what’s already established
“And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales: and he received sight forthwith, and
arose, and was baptized. And when
he had received meat, he was strengthened. Then was Saul certain days with the disciples which were at Damascus.
And straightway he preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God.”
Acts 9:18-20 KJV
this is doesn’t contradict anything else paul said or anything anyone else said each verse is meant to reconcile with the others.
but if you can find a single verse explaining baptism changed or baptism means another thing I’d be happy to think on it.
until then it remains clear (to
Me at least ) baptism
In Jesus name is for repentance and remission of sins.
does any scripture say anything different by itself ?