True, mostly. Both are force multipliers. And you can kill a lot of people with a knife before being taken down as well- provided no one there has a gun, of course.I think you are right, in that we have knife crime. However, we don't have gun crime to anything like the extent of the USA. Guns are a force multiplier, and you can kill a lot more people, a lot more quickly, and at greater range with a gun than with a knife.
Just so. But for me the issue for a Christian is, when are we going to stop manufacturing weaponry, and turn our swords into plough-shares?
Best wishes, 2RM.
Just so. But for me the issue for a Christian is, when are we going to stop manufacturing weaponry, and turn our swords into plough-shares?
Best wishes, 2RM.
Most gun crime is committed in areas where guns are heavily restricted, but people who are part of criminal gangs. Technology multiplies effort, the problem is the sinful people not the machinery.I think you are right, in that we have knife crime. However, we don't have gun crime to anything like the extent of the USA. Guns are a force multiplier, and you can kill a lot more people, a lot more quickly, and at greater range with a gun than with a knife.
Best wishes, 2RM.
Most gun crime is committed in areas where guns are heavily restricted, but people who are part of criminal gangs. Technology multiplies effort, the problem is the sinful people not the machinery.
The ability for a physically weak person to exert lethal force rapidly has saved many lives. Again, technology multiplies effort. I don't want to get into a theological discussion but I believe defense of self and the lives of other people is entirely legitimate, and thus means amplifying it are legitimate. Unregenerate criminals are going to continue their predatory behavior no matter what, and there are far more people who defend themselves than go on shooting rampages. As long as people are not following God it doesn't matter what they have or don't, their behavior will be turned to all manner of wickedness.Can we agree on this, then? That some people are bad, to be sure. But without the weapon, they wouldn't have the ability to express that badness to anything like the same extent?
Best wishes, 2RM.
It's not a suicide pact. A man is ordained by God to protect his family, as a properly constituted civil magistrate is to his. We shouldn't show malevolence towards other, but there are no 'purely spiritual brothers', except in Heaven. The Earth belongs to God and we are to obey his Commandments. Rulers are instituted by God to enforce these and in a civil capacity a man is deputized to do the same, whether defending against robbers, invaders or killers of any description.So, you wouldn't be in favour of turning the other cheek, then? I think, for my part, I would rather die than kill.
Best wishes, 2RM
Actually they would have more power. Gangs come together because there is power in numbers. Without the "force multipliers" out there in our cities like private gun ownership, the gangs would have free rein. And the police, impotent to do more than clean up after the fact before are now in many places even weaker; hamstrung by a hateful administration. And what this admin wants most is our guns, of course.Can we agree on this, then? That some people are bad, to be sure. But without the weapon, they wouldn't have the ability to express that badness to anything like the same extent?
The discourse in which Jesus said to "turn the other cheek" talked about someone taking you tunic, slapping you, or robing you. It said nothing in the whole chapter about letting someone kill you or harm your family.So, you wouldn't be in favour of turning the other cheek, then? I think, for my part, I would rather die than kill.
Yep! It has saved mine, having a gun. Other times it could have got me into trouble, having either a gun or a knife. But since I know how to use them responsibly and how not to act pridefully (things Christians should know) I didn't. I've had to swallow my pride and just walk away, because just being armed has already upped the ante. I always tell people who want to get a firearm they do not solve all your problems. They actually create more for you. Pull a weapon too soon in an altercation and you become the aggressor in the eys of the law. At the very least you just escalated the situation. Pull it too late (and too soon usually would have been the right time), you may get the weapon taken and used on you. Having a gun means training with it- a lot of training. Otherwise all you have is a liability. And it's a responsibility. You are responsible for every bullet that comes out of your gun, so even if you are cleared criminally and a bystander was hurt you could face civil penalties. Don't get me wrong, I think everyone should have a gun. But everyone should train in responsible and effective use of the guns they have.The ability for a physically weak person to exert lethal force rapidly has saved many lives. Again, technology multiplies effort. I don't want to get into a theological discussion but I believe defense of self and the lives of other people is entirely legitimate, and thus means amplifying it are legitimate. Unregenerate criminals are going to continue their predatory behavior no matter what, and there are far more people who defend themselves than go on shooting rampages. As long as people are not following God it doesn't matter what they have or don't, their behavior will be turned to all manner of wickedness.
LOL, you are incorrigible, mate! I wish you luck with that. But my wife's father escaped Germany where there were no guns except in the hands of Nazis. He went to the UK, and she was born in Derbyshire. So I talk to people there, and I've heard the stories from some. It's not all that safe in many places. But most of them still think like you. Britain has a "ban in peace beg in war" attitude towards guns. Frankly, if I were on an island with nations I'd traditionally been at war with all around I'd want to be like the Swiss and make everyone of military age keep a gun in their home. The island would be far safer with enemies knowing every male and quite a few females had a gun at home, ready to go.Yes. I don't have a wife or children. If I did, I think I would want to defend them. But the best way to do that, it seems to me, would be to live in a society devoid of guns.
Best wishes, 2RM.
LOL, you are incorrigible, mate! I wish you luck with that. But my wife's father escaped Germany where there were no guns except in the hands of Nazis. He went to the UK, and she was born in Derbyshire. So I talk to people there, and I've heard the stories from some. It's not all that safe in many places. But most of them still think like you. Britain has a "ban in peace beg in war" attitude towards guns. Frankly, if I were on an island with nations I'd traditionally been at war with all around I'd want to be like the Swiss and make everyone of military age keep a gun in their home. The island would be far safer with enemies knowing every male and quite a few females had a gun at home, ready to go.