Nobody teaches what you claim. You are arguing with a phantom teacher, one that you invent and give words to. You're "surely die" argument doesn't apply. Your use of it falls to the ground unanswered because no one is following your logic and the logical mind rejects your twisted attempt to force it.
Of course, you all teach the dead aren't "surely" dead - they're still alive and thinking and doing things, which is the same lie the Serpent told Eve. God says the dead are incapable of anything experienced by the living, period. They don't know anything, feel anything, remember anything, do anything, plan anything, worship anything, hear anything, seer anything, and have ZERO to do with any of us living because they can't return unto us living.
The bible clearly teaches a resurrection of both the wicked and the righteous dead. We know that the wicked are resurrected but we know that they do not receive the same kind of glorified body. We don't have the answers to that. We just accept what the scripture says and wait for it to happen.
Look, there are only
two kinds of bodies God's Bible talks about: mortal and immortal. Scripture says only the righteous rise with an immortal body...
WHICH MEANS THE WICKED RISE WITH A MORTAL BODY and is why they are subject to the Second Death. The only people confused about this issue are those who refuse to believe the plain word of God.
We know that there is a "being with Christ" when we die...
Please show me the verse, but if you point to 2 Corinthians 5 without adding an explanation of what Paul meant by "naked" and "unclothed" you'll be found guilty of making a context a pretext.
we know that there is a resurrection of the Body later and we know that we will ultimately be part of the New Jerusalem that comes down out of heaven to the new earth.
New Jerusalem doesn't come down to a "new" Earth - it comes down to a desolate, empty, dark, destroyed, silent Earth 1,000 years after Jesus had returned in glory to resurrect the dead in Christ and collect the living saints.
We don't understand how there are people who are resurrected, and reign with Christ a thousand years, and then the earth is destroyed and those people are then part of the New Jerusalem that comes down out of heaven to the new earth but we believe it. Do they get translated from the old earth to the new jerusalem to the new earth? Who Knows and people are dumb to teach dogmatic theories about it and call everyone else false if they don't agree with their theories.
We know full well what I said above is true by comparing Scripture with Scripture. The 1,000 years separate the risen righteous dead from "the rest of the dead" which "lived not again until the thousand years were finished".
We don't know how we have a spiritual body while waiting the resurrection but we believe it anyway.
You're believing lies - there is not "spiritual body" mentioned in Scripture - only the mortal body and the immortal body.
I don't have to understand it. God can do it. If he can resurrect my body even if it is burned to ashes, he can give me a supernatural existence after I die that you can't explain.
I'll tell you what He does: He takes the dust of the Earth, fashions a new you, puts within you the same brain you had when you died, and - voila - a new you lives. The question is, will that body be mortal or immortal?
I believe Paul includes the hope of some kind of a body after we die even before the resurrection. You don't see him saying that but I think he is saying exactly that.
WHERE, PLEASE? NOT 2 CORINTHIANS 2.
The best bible teacher will read the verses below without comment and let those that hear them understand these words as they are spoken. If they give people an expectation of being with the Lord when they die, then I think they have understood Paul clearly.
No, a good teacher will examine ALL the words of a passage and compare them with other texts to see if they agree or if symbolism is in use, because there are no contradictions in Scripture, but plenty of contradictions of interpretation, such as claiming the dead still conscious when numerous authors flatly deny that.