You have been derailed by a single verse. So go ahead and ignore Rev 6:9,10 and the souls IN heaven and shouting.
We can't build a doctrine on Revelation 6 symbolism that's left uninterpreted.
Paul couldn't have been more clear in Phil 1
21 For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain.
22 If I am to go on living in the body, this will mean fruitful labor for me. Yet what shall I choose? I do not know!
23 I am torn between the two: I desire to depart and be with Christ, which is better by far;
If Paul believed the soul sleeps, he couldn't have written v.2 or 23.
v.21 would have said "to die is to sleep until the resurrection".
v.23 would have said "I desire to depart and sleep until I will be with Christ".
Human desire - including Paul's desire to depart here and immediately appear up there - has nothing to do with
divine order. Paul himself knew he'd not immediately go there when he died - he said that takes place "at the last trump" (1 Corinthians 15:51-57 KJV). Telling the church he preferred to skip lying in the grave "naked" and "unclothed" without a body awaiting the resurrection body does not change the divine order of things.
What you you mean "between Jesus and Jesus"?
Jesus always spoke about hell in terms of the
literal body being cast in at the end of time, so for the Immortal Soul crowd to claim some ancient Rich Man was cast literally cast bodily into hellfire at his death makes a dichotomy between what Jesus says here and what He says elsewhere.
Actually, Luke 16 destroys your view, along with the verses above.
LOL No, podner, Luke 16 proves the Immortal Soul crowd lacks hermeneutical skill, Holy Spirit discernment, and plain ol' common sense.
I never said there was no symbolism. But what you point out is OBVIOUSLY symbolism. What John wrote about seeing and hearing souls IN heaven under the altar isn't symbolism.
Totally subjective conclusion which excludes the testimony of other non-symbolic Scriptures such as "the soul that sinneth, it shall die". Only in the insane clown world of "immortal soul" doctrine does "death" = "life eternal in torment".
No, He is not. Those who will be cast into the LoF do it to themselves. They refused the free gift of eternal life, which is required to live with God.
Can you hear how silly you sound? They refused the gift of eternal life in heaven so they're granted eternal life of torture. It's utter madness, this logic. "No murderer hath eternal life abiding in him" but the Immortal Soul crowd says, "NO! The wicked have eternal life in flames of torment!"
In eternity, there are only 2 locations: on the new earth (Rev 21) or in the LoF. By not receiving the gift of eternal life, they consign themselves to the LoF.
This is how clown world insane the Immortal Soul crowd is:
(1) they refuse to believe God "only hath immortality"
(1 Timothy 6:15-16 KJV)
(2) they claim humans have innate immortality and deny Paul's plain words that we must seek for it if we are to recieve it
(Romans 2:7-9 KJV)
(3) and somehow humanity has to spend eternity alive in the LoF though God told Satan "never shalt thou be anymore"
(Ezekiel 28:18-19 KJV)
**SPOILER ALERT**
Freegrace2 is going to ignore these texts and continue appealing to Rich Man parables, Revelation symbolic imagery, and Paul's human desires rather than Paul's inspired truths.
I think you should be aware by now that I've been able to answer EVERY challenge you have thrown. They are reasonable and rational.
Now, that's the best one of them all right there! Until you can explain how the three dead dudes can have tongues, eyes, fingers, and bosoms before the Resurrections of the Just and Damned at the end of time, you haven't proven a thing.