If all matter was concentrated infinitely where did it disperse to? That is assuming that you
use the common understanding of the word infinite to mean something unending. Anyway we can go round in circles with this so I am ending it here.
Thanks for the message. We appear to disagree on how to interpret Bible scripture, but that is okay because everyone has their opinions.
My stance on interpreting scripture can be characterized as relative, not absolute. In other words, I believe it is important to understand the context of certain verses and teachings instead of interpret them literally.
Take the Bible’s teachings on homosexuality, for example. The Old Testament says to kill people for doing something gay in Leviticus 20:13. The New Testament doesn’t instruct Christians to slaughter people for sodomy, but Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 6:9 that homosexuals go to hell (which is still every bit as harsh in my opinion).
These scriptures were written in a much different time. During these days humans practiced slavery, and life in general was much more reactionary by modern standards. However, we live in a much different age where people are socially enlightened, and humans have certainly progressed a long way. Thus, I don’t think the Old Testament or Paul were correct with their condemnation of gay people. Numerous scriptures testify to God’s love, mercy, and forgiveness, so I find it impossible to believe that our heavenly father would want a homosexual to die and spend eternity in hell because of his preference.
For the record, I’m not left-wing. I’ve consistently voted Republican in elections. Also, Donald Trump is supportive of LGBT.
Basically, what I’m saying is that it’s important to view the context of various scriptures before coming to a conclusion on the correct interpretation. If all Bible teachings were absolute, then women who had sex but tried to pass themselves off as virgins would get stoned to death on their father’s porch (Deuteronomy 22:20-21). We don’t live in the Bronze Age anymore, so of course Christians wouldn’t do something like that.
The same applies to the creation narrative in the Book of Genesis. The advent of modern science didn’t come about until relatively recently, so writer of Genesis didn’t have a lot to work with when telling about the beginning. The Big Bang isn’t explained in the Bible because humans didn’t know about it yet given the complete absence of scientific knowledge at the time, so I don’t view the creation tale as a literal account of events that transpired. Interpreting it as a metaphor is okay.
If you disagree with me, that’s okay too. We all have our opinions.