Usually, the charge of "twisting Scripture" is when a person makes a point and uses a verse that DOESN'T support that point.
Apologies, FreeGrace--I see I accidentally responded to you instead of Yahshua.
Usually, the charge of "twisting Scripture" is when a person makes a point and uses a verse that DOESN'T support that point.
No, as it's taken out of context--the whole of what I said should be addressed.
And the parable ends at v.6. So what follows isn't a parable but rather, figures of speech.John 10:6
6 This parable spake Jesus unto them: but they understood not what things they were which he spake unto them.
You have NO verses that say that Christ didn't die for everyone or died ONLY for some.These are equal. This is the power of the Almighty. "The lamb was slain from the foundation of the world." This was the most pivotal moment in time in all of reality. Past, present, and future. He who was, who is, and who will be died for all those who were, who are, and who are to come...when they believed in Him. For His sheep.
And the parable ends at v.6. So what follows isn't a parable but rather, figures of speech.
You have NO verses that say that Christ didn't die for everyone or died ONLY for some.
Until you find any, you have no point and no support for your theory.
No problem. It happens.Apologies, FreeGrace--I see I accidentally responded to you instead of Yahshua.![]()
You are very welcome!Ok thanks!
I examine the Scriptures every day and I so far haven't seen anything you've posted that is true.
Please don't start these accusations of twisting like the others do, Laura. Twisting. I can only reply to what I read/see. I posted the quote I was replying to as written. The quote said "the gift is not the payment". I replied to that, assuming first a weakness in this form of communication and NOT first assuming any malevolent motive. So I'd appreciate the same assumption from you. But if you're going to accuse I'll promptly conclude this exchange.
There are only two states for mankind: Death or eternal life. One is either condemned to death or one has eternal life. If the one (death) is paid, the other (eternal life) IS. This is why Paul contrasts the two in the passage. They are the opposites of each other.
The Messiah didn't take care of the one to then later on deliver the other. The gift is "taking care of the one so that the other is so, NOW" because the only reason mankind dies is because of sin. So if one's death is paid for, the result is eternal life for that one. It's a foregone conclusion for the believer.
John 11:25-26
Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:
And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?
The gift of eternal life IS the substitutionary payment for the death owed.
Joshua--I can't explain any better than I have--Christ paid the penalty for the sins of the whole world with his death--that was the payment God required. The gift given to us thru our faith in Christ and His substitutionary death is salvation--saved from what? From God's condemnation and from the second death! And if we are saved from this death what do we receive--eternal life!
I found something else you said that confuses me just as much as the other statement you made:
"The gift of eternal life IS the substitutionary payment for the death owed."
"How would eternal life be the payment for the death owed?" I'm sorry, Joshua, but this is completely backwards!Eternal life is the GIFT. Death is the payment owed. Christ paid that payment with his death on the cross.
"…Then he brought them out and asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” 31 They replied, “Believe in the Lord Jesus and you will be saved, you and your household.”''Acts 16:30-31
John 11:25-26
Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:
And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?
Probably will be my last few posts on this thread. What are we saved from?
Death.
What's the result?
eternal life.
-----
Eternal life = to live forever. Not die.
Death = to expire; to cease to be. Not live forever
The GIFT of eternal life = Eternal Life's Gift
That GIFT is to have the sin debt paid. This is a GIFT because we didn't work for it nor can we make the payment. The Messiah worked for it. This GIFT...results in eternal life...BECAUSE one is no longer condemned to die. If one is no longer condemned to die they will never die. They live forever. They are saved from death. Salvation.
If both of the quoted passages above are true...
- (Acts 16:30-31) Believe in the Messiah = Saved.
- (John 11:25-26) Believe in the Messiah = To live, never die.
....then the following is also true.
- Saved = To live, never die
If A = B ...and A = C ...then B = C
Ephesians 2:8-9
For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast.
Romans 6:26
23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Saved = The Gift
The Gift = eternal life
But Joshua--that isn't what you said--that is what I said. You said 'Salvation was the payment'![]()
Joshua--some of what you say here doesn't answer the question as to your statement here:
"The gift of eternal life IS the substitutionary payment for the death owed."
Can you see why I don't believe this makes sense?
And if you want to call Jesus' death the gift--I guess that's fine but my point was Salvation is a gift, not the payment. Typically Christ's death is called 'sacrifice' 'substitutionary', 'penalty' etc. -- In any case I don't understand why you would want to argue that point since I am simply making a point based on scripture--that salvation is the gift we receive as a result of our faith in Christ and His substitutionary death. His death is the payment for our sins and not as you say "Salvation is the payment."
In any case, I think I'm done with this forum as well--I hope I will see you in other forums and regardless that we do not hold the same views hopefully we can remain friends on these forums.
blessings,
laura
I gave you my answer, either accept it or notNo, I'm asking for just ONE verse that says in very plain unambiguous words that Christ either DIDN'T die for everyone, or that He ONLY died for some.
Is that too difficult to find?
I've already given you a number of verses that make clear that He DID die for everyone. And you didn't even try to refute any of them.
I think you don't understand what spiritual death really is. It is separation from God. Not "to cease to be". In fact, all unbelievers will exist "forever and ever" in the "Second Death" or Lake of Fire.Probably will be my last few posts on this thread. What are we saved from?
Death.
What's the result?
eternal life.
Eternal life = to live forever. Not die.
Death = to expire; to cease to be. Not live forever
you are aware, I hope, that your answer didn't include ANY verse that unambiguously said that Christ's death wasn't for everyone.I gave you my answer, either accept it or not
The Bible says repeatedly that Christ died for everyone. I have shared them with you.Fruit of Christ's Death !
What is meant by fruit is the effects and product of Christ's Death for all whom He died, for He died an Covenental Death Matt 26:28
The Greek word for "many" means just that; many, as opposed to "few".28 For this is my blood of the new testament or covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
post 778 did you understand it ? You want to discuss the points?The Bible says repeatedly that Christ died for everyone. I have shared them with you.
The Greek word for "many" means just that; many, as opposed to "few".
And, in that same gospel, Matthew also wrote this:
Matt 7:14 - But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.
So, which is it? Did Christ die for MANY, or ONLY A FEW?
What should be obvious is that "many" is a word of generality. If in fact Christ had only died for those who are on the road that "leads to life", then neither Matthew or any other writer would use the word "many" in reference to His death.
Certainly the number of saved peope is FAR LESS than the number of unsaved people, as Matt 7:14 very clearly indicates.