The following is a typical way I approach a study on Scripture teachings, this is about what control faith has -
Does man control the power of God by his faith or lack thereof?
"And
he could there do no mighty work, save that he laid his hands upon a few sick folk, and healed them. And he marveled because of their unbelief..." (Mark 6:5-6a, ERV)
"And
he did not many mighty works there because of their unbelief." (Matt 13:58, ERV)
I compare translations when starting to study a verse and in the above, there is no major disagreement.
When in the gospels I then check for the parallels and I found the two above record the same event. In Mark, it basically says Jesus
could not and Matthew records it
did not.
I can see that there is a distinct difference between a "could not" and a "did not". But I'm not a library of Christian thought on this, so I consult commentaries to see what reasons are given that are supported by comparing Scripture with Scripture, and what makes common sense to a Christian. I typically check the following commentaries I value highly to give myself various perspectives.
Adam Clarke - Methodist, Arminian, pretty much followed by the Weslyans, Holiness & Pentecostals
Matthew Poole - A Puritan, Presbyterian
John Gill - An old fashioned Particular Baptist
Heinrich Meyer - Lutheran and Greek scholar
Clarke: "Unbelief and contempt drive Christ out of the heart, as they did out of his own country. Faith seems to put the almighty power of God into the hands of men; whereas unbelief appears, to tie up even the hands of the Almighty. A man, generally speaking, can do but little good among his relatives, because it is difficult for them to look with the eyes of faith upon one whom they have been accustomed to behold with the eyes of the flesh." *Comments on Matt. 13:58
Poole: "he could not, not from a defect of power, but the exercise of Divine power is always regulated by wisdom, and in consistency with his wisdom he could do no mighty works there: for the end of our Saviour’s miracles being either to convert unbelievers to the faith of the gospel, or to confirm weak believers in it, he foresaw that the performing of miracles there would be without any saving effect, and suspended his miraculous power. Besides, he was highly provoked by their obstinate infidelity, and would not work great wonders amongst them; only be cures a few sick persons." *Comments on Mark 6:5
Meyer: "This does not include the idea of unsuccessful attempts, but what is meant is, that the unwillingness of the people to acknowledge the greatness of His person (Mat 13:55) compelled Jesus, partly on moral (because of their unworthiness) and partly also on psychical grounds (because the condition of faith was wanting), to make but a limited use of His miraculous power" *Comment on Matt. 13:58
Gill: "not that Christ had no power in himself to work miracles, though their unbelief and contempt of him were very great; but it was not fit and proper that he should do any there, since such were their prejudices against him: it is an usual way of speaking with the Hebrews, when either it is not "fit" and proper that a thing should be done, or they "will" not do it, to say it cannot be done; see Ge 19:22; and even it is said of God himself, "So that the Lord could no longer bear, because of your evil doings", Jer 44:22. Not but that he could if he would, but he would not; nor was it fit and proper that he should."
While I really like Clarke and learn a lot from him, I think he is all wrong here. I see a biblical common sense understanding in Poole and Gill.
I look to see the reasoning in a commentary, not just who wrote the commentary. Now, what about throwing a mountain into the sea by our faith?