Again, Good day sir.
The passage you spoke of said Assyria.
You lost me when you arrogantly said I had a reading problem.
I don’t agree with you. I cant scripturally.
So there is no need for us to continue.
I will post t passages to prove you do not understand prophecy in full. And it is not arrogant to point out someone who can't understand simple points, these are not complex points, it is more than likely you are playing the "I DON'T UNDERSTAND GAME", so, me saying you had reading comprehension skills was me pointing out facetiously that the real problem is you are probably play-acting as if you didn't understand the point, especially after 5 or 6 attempts.
Isaiah 10:20 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the remnant of Israel, and such as are escaped of the house of Jacob, shall no more again stay upon him that smote them; but shall stay upon the Lord, the Holy One of Israel, in truth. 21 The remnant shall return, even the remnant of Jacob, unto the mighty God. 22 For though thy people Israel be as the sand of the sea, yet a remnant of them shall return: the consumption decreed shall overflow with righteousness. 23 For the Lord God of hosts shall make a consumption, even determined, in the midst of all the land.
24 Therefore thus saith the Lord God of hosts, O my people that dwellest in Zion, be not afraid of the
Assyrian: he shall smite thee with a rod, and shall lift up his staff against thee, after the manner of Egypt.
25 For yet a very little while, and the indignation shall cease, and mine anger in their destruction.26 And the Lord of hosts shall stir up a scourge for him according to the slaughter of Midian at the rock of Oreb: and as his rod was upon the sea, so shall he lift it up after the manner of Egypt.27 And it shall come to pass in that day, that his burden shall be taken away from off thy shoulder, and his yoke from off thy neck, and the yoke shall be destroyed because of the anointing.
THE ASSYRIAN is not Assyria !! The below message can't even be argued, it shows Jesus who is born the Messiah in Bethlehem
(700 years after the Assyrian Kingdom) as he brings the PEACE at the time this Assyrian comes against Israel
(End Times not 700 years before he was even BORN), and since Jesus wasn't born in Bethlehem until 700 years after Assyria was a Kingdom, common sense has to prevail, THE ASSYRIAN that is spoken of here can only be a ruler after Jesus is born, but of course, you can't admit this because being RIGHT seems all-important, whereas I see Gods truth as the most important thing, because without God's truth we are led down rabbit holes by Satan.
Micah 5:2 But thou,
Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah,
yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel(Jesus is the HE); whose goings forth have been from of old, from
everlasting.
SO JESUS IS BORN !!
Then the Peace is brought at the end times(NOT 700 YEARS before), the land of Assyria and the Land of Nimrod are euphemisms for an unknown name, but it's now called Iraq, Iran, and Turkey. Just like Gog and Magog is used by John in Revelation chapter 20, but it's not
THE Gog and Magog wars spoken of by Ezekiel, because that happens just before or just after the 70th-week starts. So, John uses Gog and Magog just like Micah uses Assyria below, common sense tells us the Gog and Magog reference by John is not
THE Gog and Magog wars because it happens 1000 years after
THE Gog and Magog war. Likewise, the Assyrian reference in Michah happens AFTER Jesus' birth, Micah calls it the
LAND OF Assyria and the LAND OF Nimrod, the use of the name Nimrod ought to clue you in, Nimrod was not alive when Assyria become a great Kingdom. Nimrod lived in 1750 BC, not 700 BC, so that reference alone should tell you it is a FUTURE EVENT pointing unto the LAND OF Nimrod and the LAND OF Assyria.
Michah 5:5
And this man(Jesus was the Messiah born in Bethlehem) shall be the peace, when the Assyrian shall come into our land: and when he shall tread in our palaces, then shall we raise against him seven shepherds, and eight principal men.
6 And they shall waste the
land of Assyria with the sword, and
the land of Nimrod in the entrances thereof: thus shall he deliver us from
the Assyrian(Anti-Christ), when he cometh into our land, and when he treadeth within our borders.
7 And the
remnant of Jacob shall be in the midst of many people as a dew from the Lord, as the showers upon the grass, that tarrieth not for man, nor waiteth for the sons of men.
Some people are not called unto Prophecy but they try to be something they are not called unto, a foot needs to be a foot, not a hand in the body of Christ, be what you are called unto. Obey God in all things. The below are more examples of Double Meaning Prophecies, misunderstood by many today or Prophesies tat cover two different tie periods, that confuse some people.
In Daniel 21-45 you have tee subsets of people, those who think it's all about the End Time Anti-Christ AND those who think it is all about Antiochus Epiphanes IV, and then you have those of us who understand the Prophesy 100 percent correctly, verses 21-33 maybe 34 are all about Antiochus, verse 35 is a "TRANSITION VERSE" and verses 36-45 and even Dan. 12:1-2 (there was no real chapter divides, men, added them, sometimes in the wrong places) is the coming Anti-Christ/Little Horn/End Time Beast. So, you have the exact same type of prophecy here as you have in Isaiah 10.
Likewise in Daniel chapter 8 we have a divergent prophecy in that Dan. 8:9 SWITCHES from the Dan. 8:1-8 prophecy of Alexander the Great and his Four Generals unto the END TIME Anti-Christ in verse 9.
A lot of people cant see it, even Pastor Jimmy Evans thinks Dan 8:9 is Antiochus, it's not. Gabriel reveals the dream later on in the chapter and calls this man an END TME Beast. God's ways are not our ways, to be sure, but He gives us references that if we will SLOW DOWN, we can grasp them very clearly.
In order for you to be correct, you have to have Jesus being born 700 years AFTER Assyria was a Kingdom, KEEPING the Peace 700 years BEFORE he was even born as a man. That doesn't even make sense, because it is not what the Prophesy means. It is referring to an END TIME EVENT, where after this man with Assyrian blood, who is born in Greece as Dan. 8:9 tells us AND who comes to power in Europe as Dan. 7:7-9 tells us will indeed come into the land and Conquer Jerusalem, by the way, Assyria never conquered Jerusalem. But all that aside, when Michah says that Jesus (in Micah 5:2) will ve the man that kees THE PEACE, that should e enough to tell you it did not happen 700 years before, it's an END TIME PROPHECY.
You can call it what you will, that matters nit unto me, my job is to get the truth unto the masses, even unto those with stiff necks. It's not that hard to understand the Assyrian is an En Time name for the Anti-Christ. Just because you have never heard of it diest change the facts brother.