The Falling Away - pre-trib rapture or ???
- Thread starter DavidTree
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Right now you are expressing the definition of insanity - you are rejoicing over an error and making things up where you cannot even see and read, plain as day, scripture
Revelation 19 and 20 are One Event - they are not different times/days
You also do not understand this - "they were married and given in marriage"
Revelation 19 and 20 are One Event - they are not different times/days
You also do not understand this - "they were married and given in marriage"
Scripture is quite clear. Jesus comes to earth in Rev 19 and the beast and false prophet are thrown into the lake of fire.
Then in ch 20, v.1-3 show Satan being bound for 1,000 years. v.4--6 shows the FIRST resurrection that you still are denying.
4 I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony about Jesus and because of the word of God. Theyhad not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned (resurrection) with Christ a thousand years.
5(The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection.
The bolded words here refer to the SECOND resurrection, which occurs at the GWTJ for the unsaved.
6 Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years.
All 3 verses mention the "first resurrection". v.4 makes reference by "they came to life", which is a resurrection. v.5 and 6 SAY the "first resurrection" plainly.
So we are not supposing anything.
Read it for yourself. But then, you'd have to open those eyes of yours.
Says the master dodger.
Isn't this the touted "pretrib rapture" go-to verse?
Then in ch 20, v.1-3 show Satan being bound for 1,000 years. v.4--6 shows the FIRST resurrection that you still are denying.
4 I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony about Jesus and because of the word of God. Theyhad not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned (resurrection) with Christ a thousand years.
5(The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection.
The bolded words here refer to the SECOND resurrection, which occurs at the GWTJ for the unsaved.
6 Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years.
All 3 verses mention the "first resurrection". v.4 makes reference by "they came to life", which is a resurrection. v.5 and 6 SAY the "first resurrection" plainly.
So we are not supposing anything.
Read it for yourself. But then, you'd have to open those eyes of yours.
Says the master dodger.
Isn't this the touted "pretrib rapture" go-to verse?
-
1
- Show all
Hi again,
No you did not
"Are the dead that are on thrones in rev 20 the 1st resurrection? "
Pretty straight forward question, no?
2. When you attempt to explain "they were married and given in marriage" please keep it in context of the whole....
Matt 24:38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,
Luke 17:26 And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man.
Luke 17:27 They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all.
Luke 17:28 Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded;
I understand clearly we are espoused to God, but im pretty sure this is not in the context The Christ is speaking...
God Bless
No you did not
"Are the dead that are on thrones in rev 20 the 1st resurrection? "
Pretty straight forward question, no?
2. When you attempt to explain "they were married and given in marriage" please keep it in context of the whole....
Matt 24:38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,
Luke 17:26 And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man.
Luke 17:27 They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all.
Luke 17:28 Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded;
I understand clearly we are espoused to God, but im pretty sure this is not in the context The Christ is speaking...
God Bless
Watch the video on the link - it is about the vaxx and is about who you will be married too - choose wisely
https://healthfreedom.info/DR BENJAMIN RUSH QUOTE.htm
https://healthfreedom.info/DR BENJAMIN RUSH QUOTE.htm
-
1
- Show all
If you look at it step by step, it tells a story
Martyrs
Killed by ac
Refused mark
Resurrected
Sitting on thrones
Honored
Rewarded
Not in heaven
But could have been earlier.
Now the confusion;
Niv says " they came to life and reigned"
If you examine the greek, it does not say " came to life" , which would place their resurrection way after the ac defeated and satan chained.
Look at the circulation of the niv.
How many have been misled????
This is a huge deal, because the " one coming, no saints ever go to heaven" erroneous teachings take that misplaced " ch 20 resurrection" and try desperately to fit it in.
It is comical and tragic.
So my point in debating them is actually playing their deal out.
I actually put on their post trib hat and boots and anihalate their claims.
IMO, remember, my opinion, those on thrones are being described and who they are, where they came from and the 1 st resurrection declaration is over them and the dead in christ at the rapture. It is saying they were resurrected....but NOT WHEN.
It does not matter actually. Because we must speculate.
It also includes the firstfruits.
Christ and the patriarchs when Jesus came down to paradise, preached the gospel, and emptied it.
But here is the pivot point.( my point)
Postribs claim one rapture (harvest). One " coming" and 0ne " 1st resurrection"
So with my postrib hat on , i destroy their own doctrine
Oh the irony!!!!
So some of my " reasoning" to pretribs is not going to make sense cause i am taking their deal and mopping the floor with their own poorly thought out doctrine.
But having tons of fun...lol
Martyrs
Killed by ac
Refused mark
Resurrected
Sitting on thrones
Honored
Rewarded
Not in heaven
But could have been earlier.
Now the confusion;
Niv says " they came to life and reigned"
If you examine the greek, it does not say " came to life" , which would place their resurrection way after the ac defeated and satan chained.
Look at the circulation of the niv.
How many have been misled????
This is a huge deal, because the " one coming, no saints ever go to heaven" erroneous teachings take that misplaced " ch 20 resurrection" and try desperately to fit it in.
It is comical and tragic.
So my point in debating them is actually playing their deal out.
I actually put on their post trib hat and boots and anihalate their claims.
IMO, remember, my opinion, those on thrones are being described and who they are, where they came from and the 1 st resurrection declaration is over them and the dead in christ at the rapture. It is saying they were resurrected....but NOT WHEN.
It does not matter actually. Because we must speculate.
It also includes the firstfruits.
Christ and the patriarchs when Jesus came down to paradise, preached the gospel, and emptied it.
But here is the pivot point.( my point)
Postribs claim one rapture (harvest). One " coming" and 0ne " 1st resurrection"
So with my postrib hat on , i destroy their own doctrine
Oh the irony!!!!
So some of my " reasoning" to pretribs is not going to make sense cause i am taking their deal and mopping the floor with their own poorly thought out doctrine.
But having tons of fun...lol
-
1
- Show all
My ability to go into their power points, take on their beliefs, and see the error gives me a huge advantage over them.
Why?
Because in all these years of debating them, i have NEVER SEEN THEM DO THE SAME THING.
( BTW, i can actually present their doctrine better than they can.
I make it my business to know their workbook.
That is how i know they have no verses. I have swam in their pool as many hours as they have..
They do not have a single verse.
Why?
Because in all these years of debating them, i have NEVER SEEN THEM DO THE SAME THING.
( BTW, i can actually present their doctrine better than they can.
I make it my business to know their workbook.
That is how i know they have no verses. I have swam in their pool as many hours as they have..
They do not have a single verse.