what is the purpose of speaking about human freewill that has no power? ]
The purpose? To speak reality, the truth. The notion that IF free were true, it would have power is what is unreality.
Calvinists MUST describe free will as having power in order to prove that is wrong. Of course a free will with power is wrong.
But Calvinists cannot accept the truth of free will because it gets in the way of their incorrect understanding of God's sovereignty. To them, God's sovereignty means He makes all the choices and CAUSES all things. That's the only way they can defend their unbiblical doctrine of election.
This is really naive. Every slave has freedom to think whatever they want. Or didn't you think of that?
But that isn't the point of Paul's use of bondage. It wasn't about freedom to choose at all. Paul made the point that unbelievers can't choose to be righteous. They are slaves to sin.
Given that, do you think believers CAN'T sin???? Of course they can. Which is why we are commanded NOT to.
That is why Paul wrote this in Romans 6-
11 In the same way, count yourselves dead to sin but alive to God in Christ Jesus.
12 Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its evil desires.
13 Do not offer any part of yourself to sin as an instrument of wickedness, but rather offer yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life; and offer every part of yourself to him as an instrument of righteousness.
16 Don’t you know that when you offer yourselves to someone as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one you obey—whether you are slaves to sin, which leads to death, or to obedience, which leads to righteousness?
If you don't see choices here, you are just choosing to not see it. It's right in front of you.
The purpose? To speak reality, the truth. The notion that IF free were true, it would have power is what is unreality.
Calvinists MUST describe free will as having power in order to prove that is wrong. Of course a free will with power is wrong.
But Calvinists cannot accept the truth of free will because it gets in the way of their incorrect understanding of God's sovereignty. To them, God's sovereignty means He makes all the choices and CAUSES all things. That's the only way they can defend their unbiblical doctrine of election.
what part of bondage do you understand as freewill?
But that isn't the point of Paul's use of bondage. It wasn't about freedom to choose at all. Paul made the point that unbelievers can't choose to be righteous. They are slaves to sin.
Given that, do you think believers CAN'T sin???? Of course they can. Which is why we are commanded NOT to.
That is why Paul wrote this in Romans 6-
11 In the same way, count yourselves dead to sin but alive to God in Christ Jesus.
12 Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its evil desires.
13 Do not offer any part of yourself to sin as an instrument of wickedness, but rather offer yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life; and offer every part of yourself to him as an instrument of righteousness.
16 Don’t you know that when you offer yourselves to someone as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one you obey—whether you are slaves to sin, which leads to death, or to obedience, which leads to righteousness?
If you don't see choices here, you are just choosing to not see it. It's right in front of you.