No
james made it clear that if we claim to have faith, yet do not show the world everyone who,has true faith will show, our faith is dead, and he asked the question, can that type of faith save you.
the answer is no, because it is a lifeless useless faith than in effect is non existent.
james was telling people who were hearers not doers to examine themselves. To see if their faith is real. NT for us to determin if they are saved or not
There seems to be a lot of misconception about what James meant in ch 2. In v.14, he wasn't referring to saving faith. But he was warning believers how to be rescused/delivered/saved (all mean the same thing by 'sozo') from being charged with hypocrisy.
The next 2 verses (v.15,16) gives a clear example of a hypocrite. All talk, no action. And 1 John 3:18 makes the same point: Dear children, let us not love with words or speech but with actions and in truth.
Then, in v.18 James makes a summary statement about what he meant.
But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.” Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by my deeds.
Translations that include quote marks (Greeks didn't), have the endquote mark as above. However, the quote marks should be around both sentences, otherwise it doesn't make sense. So this "someone" is actually saying this:
"You have faith; I have deeds. (you) Show me your faith without deeds, and I (the someone) will show you my faith BY by deeds."
Now it makes sense. The only way for others to see our faith is by what we do. This chapter is not teaching deeds must be present in order to be saved.
2:24 says we are not saved by faith alone. What is misconstrued is the kind of justification that James was meaning.
So James and Paul weren't in disagreement at all. Paul was talking about justification in God's eyes, while James was talking about justification in the eyes of other people.
And there are a number of verses that refer to the perspective of both God and others.
Justification in James is in the eyes of others.
There are a number of verses that supports the idea that James was concerned about how believers live their lives before others.
Rom 12:17 - Never pay back evil for evil to anyone. Respect what is right
in the sight of all men.
This verse specifically notes the perspective of others.
Rom 14:18 - For he who in this way serves Christ is
acceptable to God and
approved by men.
This verse directly notes how our lifestyle is acceptable/approved by God and by men.
2 Cor 5:12 - We are not again commending ourselves to you but are giving you an occasion to be proud of us, so that you will have an answer
for those who take pride in appearance and not in heart.
Man cannot see the heart; only God can, which is where our faith is. So, by living our our faith, we have an answer for those who take pride in appearance.
2 Cor 8:21 - for we have regard for what is honorable,
not only in the sight of the Lord, but
also in the sight of men.
This could not be more clear: in the sight of the Lord (for justification) and in the sight of men (for their approval or justification).
Col 4:5 - Be wise
in the way you act toward outsiders; make the most of every opportunity.
1 Tim 3:7 - And he must have a
good reputation with those outside the church, so that he will not fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.
Clearly speaking of having a good testimony before others (outside the church-unbelievers), which avoids the charge of hypocrisy.
1 Thess 4:12 - so that you will
behave properly toward outsiders and not be in any need.
Ditto
1 Pet 2:12 -
Keep your behavior excellent among the Gentiles, so that in the thing in which they slander you as evildoers, they may because of your good deeds, as they observe them, glorify God in the day of visitation.
Clearly Peter is emphasizing that believers who live out their faith, not being hypocrites, will have a positive effect upon unbelievers.
1 Jn 3:18 - Little children,
let us not love with word or with tongue, but in deed and truth.
This is directly linked to James 2:15,16; the example of the believer who told people "be warmed and filled" but didn't do anything to meet their needs. He was a blatant hypocrite. iow, he "loved only with word or tongue", but definitely not "in deed and truth".