Why don't you just answer the questions!please see Isaiah 43:11, 45:15, Revelation 13:8, and Luke 2:11
Why don't you just answer the questions!please see Isaiah 43:11, 45:15, Revelation 13:8, and Luke 2:11
I don't believe the "US." I don't think that was in the photograph copy.Don't forget to include the part that the "FOR" also pertains to:
"and hast redeemed US to God by thy blood out-of EVERY..."
[do you think this ^ has anything to do with "unto the day of redemption" and "the redemption of the 'purchased-possession'" (<--that's us / 'the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY')]
9 And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation;
He is never 'not worthy' This is nonsense!
Isa 43:11 I, even I, am the Lord; and beside me there is no saviour.please see Isaiah 43:11, 45:15, Revelation 13:8, and Luke 2:11
I don't believe the "US." I don't think that was in the photograph copy.
Where was Jesus at this time? Explain why Jesus was not found here.
22 “All things have been committed to me by my Father. No one knows who the Son is except the Father, and no one knows who the Father is except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.”
Please explain how verse 22 answers the questions as to where Jesus was when that first search was carried out.
Now you are just playing games: these are all nothing but red herrings.
Why don't you just answer the questions!
I fail to understand why you all fight so hard against a simple reading of the Text? It is written very plainly that a search was conducted and "no man was found."
That means that at the time, JESUS was not worthy to take the book and open the seals.
I was not being sarcastic. In general, "He is never not worthy." But we were not talking in general terms. We were talking about a specific verse:thus demonstrating His worthiness, not adding worthiness to Himself that was somehow previously lacking.
please recall your own statement:
or were you being sarcastic?
do you really believe God is unworthy?
The truth is, you can't here "no man was found worthy." it is plain you don't believe that scripture. So you throw in red herrings because you don't believe this verse.stop replying out of frustration and give some actual thought to what i've already told you.
i've already answered your question several times. i've given you everything you need to understand it, if you could hear it.
In general, "He is never not worthy."
The truth is, you can't here "no man was found worthy." it is plain you don't believe that scripture. So you throw in red herrings because you don't believe this verse.
I did. I posted them. Did you not read my response?you're making a fool of yourself. go sit under a tree and think about the verses i gave you.
We are talking about a search for one worthy to take the book and open the seals. VERY SPECIFIC. Why is it you wonder around to other things?if He is ever not worthy in any specific instance then it is a lie to say He is never not worthy.
stop and think. go away for 3 hours before you write me again.
Right, but you just sidestepped the question as if to avoid it! John tells us there was a point in time that NO MAN was found worthy, and that would include Jesus Christ - who was LATER found worthy.It means that a "searching judgment" has taken place, and it involved "[ppl] in heaven... in earth... under the earth"...
JESUS was the ONLY ONE "worthy" (to open the scroll / book)
["the Lion of the tribe of Judah... hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seals thereof"... [OT refs-->] "Judah is my lawgiver [/scepter]"--see also Heb1:8]
No, you have just given us red herrings. You have sidestepped the real question because it seems, you just don't believe John when He wrote that "no man was found worthy." "No man" here had to include Jesus at that point in time.stop replying out of frustration and give some actual thought to what i've already told you.
i've already answered your question several times. i've given you everything you need to understand it, if you could hear it.
Since you continue to argue, or disagree, I can only understand that you DON'T believe John when he wrote that "no man was found worthy" at that point in time. "No man" had to include Jesus because He was NOT hiding as one of your red herrings suggested.IOW you don't comprehend what you're reading, yet you think you are my teacher.
I am sorry you can't understand the real question.no one knows God except those to whom God chooses to reveal Himself to. i.e. God hides Himself.
again, please see Isaiah 43:11, 45:15, Revelation 13:8, and Luke 2:11.