How do you find a balance between putting others first and caring more about them, but also not letting them walk on you/take advantage of you/take you for granted?
That's a good question, one many should figure out the answer to, and one that I personally think needs to be addressed more from the pulpit.
The balance is between "I am more important than anybody else" and "everybody else is more important than me." When I consider myself of neither more nor less important than anybody else, but of exactly equal importance with everybody else, then I find the balance that guides my actions in what I give to others and what I spend on myself.
I want to elaborate on this a bit.
Jesus did not say we are to love our neighbors MORE than ourselves, or LESS than - we are to love them AS we love ourselves. (Although I know some people who really hate themselves... I would hope they treat others better than that.)
We are not to ignore our own needs and waste away to support wasteful people any more than we are supposed to hoard all we have.
For example: in the Bible, in Israel, they were supposed to take care of travelers. When a traveler stopped for the night in a town, he was not supposed to have to beg for food. Somebody was supposed to invite him in to stay the night. However... if somebody made a life out of traveling all the time, to get free room and board every night, the word would probably get out about him and people probably wouldn't be so fast to invite him in.
For me it's a difference between "me" and "us." I can see this life as "me, in this world, trying to make it through the best I can" or I can see it as "us, in this world, trying to make it through the best we can." I can take care of me, first, foremost and always, or I can choose actions that take care of me and take care of others at the same time. The second way usually winds up in me not having quite as much for me, personally... but it sure makes for a lot better, happier atmosphere in general in the area where I am.
And the second way doesn't take a lot more attention or resources than the first way.
For example:
- If I get a new laptop, the old one has to go somewhere. I could sell it on ebay for a pittance or throw it away, but I'd rather load it up with a few useful freeware programs and give it to somebody who needs a basic computer to do everyday end-user stuff like facebook, youtube, email and such.
- BUT... that doesn't mean I have to turn myself into a one-man no-child-left-behind program and buy a laptop for every kid at my church.
- A lady at church had cancer. Due to covid and her chemo-influenced immune system she was stuck at home for a long time. I knew this lady and kinda figured this staying at home was wearing on her nerves, as she was always the kind to be active and involved in something. I had a bluetooth "bar" speaker I wasn't using any more so I loaded it up with the kind of music she liked and gave it to her, so at least she'd have some music to listen to.
- BUT... that doesn't mean I have to stockpile speaker units and give one to everybody who is sick.
For me it's not a matter of "I have to give this because God would want me to." It's just noticing what might make people happy, being aware of my resources and using some of my resources - judiciously, not lavishly or frivolously - to do something about it when it is feasible.