When Has God Gathered After He Scattered Without Any Repentance?
- Thread starter Phoneman-777
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
K
It's a debunked lie man, you can say it a million times it doesn't make it true. This myth is found the most on anti - Semitic websites. That tells you right there that it's wrong. But since you want to keep repeating it we will debunk it for you here.
First of all this information comes from a book, one, count it, one book. It was written by a ... historian, an expert on peoples around the world? No, a poet!! And the historicity of his book hasn't even proven to be reliable. Now here we go with some facts, so others don't believe this utter lie.
** Jews already lived in Europe a thousand years before the Khazar kingdom was formed. There are no genetic markers or indicators at all showing that Ashkenazi Jews are descended from Turkic tribes. In fact, there exists considerable genetic evidence showing that European Jews are closer to Levantine and Syrian Arabs than to Central Asians.
** There are more"Semitic" Sephardic Jews in Israel today than there are European Ashkenazi Jews. And if the Khazars looked Turkic, how on earth could they give Ashkenazi Jews a European complexion?
** If all Ashkenazi Jews are descended from converted Khazars, why are there Cohens and Levis among them? One inherits the status of a Cohen (priest) or Levite from one’s father. Descendants of converts through the male line can never be a Cohen or a Levite.
** Why are there no Khazar surnames among Ashkenazim, or Khazar names for towns in Europe where Jews lived? And why did most Ashkenazi communities speak variations of Yiddish rather than Turkic?
As I said, this myth has been debunked. Genetic evidence proves it to be wrong. Yet anti- Jew websites that deny the Holocaust happened still continue to push this lie. One that has been debunked, with evidence. smh So you need to come up with another argument, because I just blew this one out of the water.
-
1
- Show all
K
As long as you keep saying it, I'll keep saying it. That is a lie disproved with genetic evidence. It was a book written by a poet. Not an expert. So you better watch it with the low information quips, because right now you're looking pretty low on info yourself. Talk about being duped. smh Hold on now, we're going on a ride...
Genesis 13:14-15 “Lift your eyes now and look from the place where you are … for all the land which you see I will give to you and your descendants forever.”
Genesis 15:18 “On the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying: ‘To your descendants I have given this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the River Euphrates.’”
That sounds awfully specific...
(Genesis 15:13-14). “Know certainly that your descendants will be strangers in a land that is not theirs, and will serve them, and they will afflict them four hundred years. And also the nation whom they serve I will judge; afterward they shall come out with great possessions”
You might even say it sounds literal...
To Isaac “Sojourn in this land, and I will be with you and bless you; for to you and your descendants I will give all these lands, and I will perform the oath which I swore to Abraham your father” (Genesis 26:3).
“I am the LORD God of Abraham your father and the God of Isaac; the land on which you lie I will give to you and your descendants.”
Talkin' bout terra firma right there.
Now let's get down to the nitty gritty. What is a blood covenant ? I'm glad you asked!
"In the blood covenant, the contracting parties would agree on the terms of the covenant. Then they would take an animal, kill it, split the carcass in half down the backbone, and place the divided parts opposite each other on the ground forming a pathway between the pieces.
The two would join hands, recite the contents of the covenant, and walk between the divided halves of the slain animal. The blood covenant meant they were bound until death, and if either broke the terms of the covenant, his blood should be spilled as the blood of the slain animal. A blood covenant was a permanent and unconditional covenant."
Gen. 15 we see the animals prepared and God puts Abe into a deep sleep. And then what happened? God Himself passed between the animals. Making an unconditional covenant.
God said “If his sons [Israel] forsake My law and do not walk in My judgments, if they break My statutes and do not keep My commandments, then I will visit their transgression with the rod, and their iniquity with stripes.”
“Nevertheless My lovingkindness I will not utterly take from him, nor allow My faithfulness to fail.”
“I will bring back the captives of My people Israel; they shall build the waste cities and inhabit them; they shall plant vineyards and drink wine from them; they shall also make gardens and eat fruit from them. I will plant them in their land, and no longer shall they be pulled up from the land I have given them, says the LORD your God” (Amos 9:14-15).
Literal land. A nation, born in a day. Israel. The Jews lost the title because of unbelief and disobedience. But they never lost the deed. Now you've been totally debunked. And yet your hatred won't let you believe you are wrong. But this post is so that others will know the truth from your lies. Carry on with your myths, don't let the truth stop you.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
I have been showing you the proper interpretation of Gen.15 & 17. The covenant between God and Abraham is in Christ and God carried on this covenant with Isaac for the same reason.
In fact, to establish his covenant with Isaac and Isaacs fiture children, then tell Abraham to sacrifice Isaac before he had children, is proof that Abraham believed that God would raise his "promised son" from the dead (Heb.11:17-19).
Yes, we have been here before and it isn't silly to me. It's sad and infuriating, because so called Christian theologians have been leading Jewish people to damnation with their misconceptions.
In fact, to establish his covenant with Isaac and Isaacs fiture children, then tell Abraham to sacrifice Isaac before he had children, is proof that Abraham believed that God would raise his "promised son" from the dead (Heb.11:17-19).
Yes, we have been here before and it isn't silly to me. It's sad and infuriating, because so called Christian theologians have been leading Jewish people to damnation with their misconceptions.
I love everyone, including those who can't see there's no way the Israelites carried away by the Assyrians and the Romans survived as a people after their men were slaughtered and their women were raped and impregnated by pagans, forced into marriage with pagans, sold into slave service to pagans, etc. The Israelite DNA has long disappeared into the murky waters of the global pagan gene pool.
You do realize God never made a covenant with Gentiles - only Israel, right?
If we're going to be participants of the New Covenant, we're going to have to grafted into Israel -- and "Israel" is clearly now "those who belong to Christ" and those who "walk by this rule" - the rule of being a "new creature in Christ".
It's no longer according to race, but according to grace.
If we're going to be participants of the New Covenant, we're going to have to grafted into Israel -- and "Israel" is clearly now "those who belong to Christ" and those who "walk by this rule" - the rule of being a "new creature in Christ".
It's no longer according to race, but according to grace.
-
1
- Show all
Ahh, this reminds me of the other exchange I am having with Christians who claim to reject replacement theology, and yet continue to insist that we in the Body of Christ are under the New Covenant that was promised to Israel.
https://christianchat.com/threads/how-to-be-born-again.198023/post-4520482
As I said to you, I can respect your clear stand that you do believe in replacement theology, even when I disagree with that.
https://christianchat.com/threads/how-to-be-born-again.198023/post-4520482
As I said to you, I can respect your clear stand that you do believe in replacement theology, even when I disagree with that.
-
2
- Show all
P
Well my friend all i can say is my God is the God of the impossible.
By you absolutely denying what is set before your eyes remains a mystery to me.
Why we were ever commanded to pray for the peace of israel will remain a mystery to you also.
I do have to caution you on one thing. If you use the term jews that murdered christ it will not go well with you.
For one it denies Jesus as the willing sacrifice and Jesus himself never held them accountable. What gives you the right?
Forgive them father for they no not what they do.
By you absolutely denying what is set before your eyes remains a mystery to me.
Why we were ever commanded to pray for the peace of israel will remain a mystery to you also.
I do have to caution you on one thing. If you use the term jews that murdered christ it will not go well with you.
For one it denies Jesus as the willing sacrifice and Jesus himself never held them accountable. What gives you the right?
Forgive them father for they no not what they do.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Yes, let's stigmatize the opposition with "anti-semitic" labels and close the minds of the people before the evidence has a chance to speak.
Attacking the credibility of individuals based on whether they've obtained or lack credentials is called "Argument From Authority", which they used to attack Jesus, remember? Many brilliant people in history wore a variety of hats, including poet, scholar, researcher, historian, scientist, etc. The man who brought Protestant Historicism, the movement that shook the entire world - Martin Luther - was a very talented music composer as well as a theolgian and revolutionary.
By whose estimation? They were scattered, slaughtered, raped, sold into slavery, forced into pagan marriages, etc. Their DNA disappeared into the pagan gene pool.
You are reading propagandist nonsense by false Christian prophets and/or imposters who stand to lose a great deal of money and support if exposed. To the contrary, this is what an HONEST Hebrew says about the subject:
It's called "co-opting religion". Do some research on the BHI movement.
Because they co-opted the religion of Judaism in the 8th century, maybe?
Again, by WHO? Follow the money. Do you actually think the pagans allowed the 12 Tribes to preserve themselves pure as a people after almost 2,600 years of living among the filth of the Gentiles?
Attacking the credibility of individuals based on whether they've obtained or lack credentials is called "Argument From Authority", which they used to attack Jesus, remember? Many brilliant people in history wore a variety of hats, including poet, scholar, researcher, historian, scientist, etc. The man who brought Protestant Historicism, the movement that shook the entire world - Martin Luther - was a very talented music composer as well as a theolgian and revolutionary.
By whose estimation? They were scattered, slaughtered, raped, sold into slavery, forced into pagan marriages, etc. Their DNA disappeared into the pagan gene pool.
You are reading propagandist nonsense by false Christian prophets and/or imposters who stand to lose a great deal of money and support if exposed. To the contrary, this is what an HONEST Hebrew says about the subject:
"Still, in spite of repeated efforts, there is no agreed upon criterion to identify Jews, and samples examined for the distribution of biological or molecular markers all depend on the preconceived biases of the investigators."
So what? There are blacks who've gone over to Israel claiming to be descendants of the tribe of Dan, and have been welcomed with open arms, so are the very suble differences between the peoples you speak of that important? Subjective conclusions are always relative in the eyes of those who make suppositions. Stick with the facts of history and common sense: the Jews, as did the 10 tribes from the North, DISAPPEARED into the murky water of the global pagan gene pool long before anyone began to insist they "lived a thousand years in the land before the Khazars".It's called "co-opting religion". Do some research on the BHI movement.
Because they co-opted the religion of Judaism in the 8th century, maybe?
Again, by WHO? Follow the money. Do you actually think the pagans allowed the 12 Tribes to preserve themselves pure as a people after almost 2,600 years of living among the filth of the Gentiles?
Oh, yes, the old, "God is the God of the impossible" though we can easily interpret prophecy to be fulfilled in Spiritual Israel, right?
Because the people who occupy the land of ancient Israel have nothing to do with end times prophecy, and shifting the focus of Christians from where it should be to eschatological error is dangerous.
Where exactly are we commanded to pray that?
Whoa, the fact Jesus had to ask the Father to forgive them PROVES they were guilty! And since when can a murder only take place if the victim fights back? That's not being very objective, but textbook subjectivity.
Because the people who occupy the land of ancient Israel have nothing to do with end times prophecy, and shifting the focus of Christians from where it should be to eschatological error is dangerous.
Where exactly are we commanded to pray that?
Whoa, the fact Jesus had to ask the Father to forgive them PROVES they were guilty! And since when can a murder only take place if the victim fights back? That's not being very objective, but textbook subjectivity.
Spiritual Israel - the church - absolutely took over from where Literal Israel dropped the ball because they got 490 years probation from the time of the decree to send them back to Jerusalem to get their act together, but they FAILED and is why they are lost in history while the church has emerged from the Dark Ages as that light which will shine the brightest when the world is made the darkest.
Who are you to judge the credentials of historic figures? What about your credentials?
I remember reading where New Jerusalem is coming down to that location and Abraham's true descendants - those in Christ - will reside there, right?
Historic, not future.
What a colossal misapplication of Scripture. Abraham's descendants are those who "are Christ's" possession, the church, in which the promises made to Abraham will be fulfilled! But, keep on dismissing this fact so you can keep on deluding yourself that a people that long ago disappeared into the surrounding nations are still intact and ready to fulfill end times prophecy. The rest of us know better.
I remember reading where New Jerusalem is coming down to that location and Abraham's true descendants - those in Christ - will reside there, right?
Historic, not future.
What a colossal misapplication of Scripture. Abraham's descendants are those who "are Christ's" possession, the church, in which the promises made to Abraham will be fulfilled! But, keep on dismissing this fact so you can keep on deluding yourself that a people that long ago disappeared into the surrounding nations are still intact and ready to fulfill end times prophecy. The rest of us know better.
Gal.4 plainly tells us Gen.21 is allegorical Hagar being Mt. Sinai, bondage and Sarah being the new Jerusalem, freedom and how Ishmael the flesh person persecuted Isaac the born again person.
The other guy I was talking to can't understand how how stories in the OT have spiritual meanings, such as the land promised to the Patriarchs being the city of peace, Jerusalem made new in Christ,
Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: Mt.25:34
How about you TDW?
The other guy I was talking to can't understand how how stories in the OT have spiritual meanings, such as the land promised to the Patriarchs being the city of peace, Jerusalem made new in Christ,
Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: Mt.25:34
How about you TDW?
What distinction?
All the promises are fulfilled in Christ (an the only Israel that is in Christ), not fake Jews that took over Judaism after God scattered them to the four winds of the pagan world, never to be seen again.
See the difference? Fanatics of "Literal Israel in prophecy" are following man-centered theology, while Spiritual Israel is Christ-centered theology.
"Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not And to seeds, as of many, but as of one. 'And to thy seed', which is Christ." - Galatians 3:16 KJV
All the promises are fulfilled in Christ (an the only Israel that is in Christ), not fake Jews that took over Judaism after God scattered them to the four winds of the pagan world, never to be seen again.
See the difference? Fanatics of "Literal Israel in prophecy" are following man-centered theology, while Spiritual Israel is Christ-centered theology.