Censorship by Big tech attacked Parler.com

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#41
Mar 19, 2011
12,660
1,094
113
#41
CS1 said:
Parler was not involved in inciting insurrection. That is a lie! Ony the left lying Democrats and foolish snowflakes would come up with such lie.
Click to expand...
Except it was Trump and his followers who radicalized these peopleby convincing them that the election had been stolen from them when they in fact legitimately lost
Google made the decision parler due to their failure to moderate hate speech and threats of violence
this is how the free market works. A business can decide not to do business with someone else
 
CS1

CS1

Well-known member
#42
May 23, 2012
13,003
4,315
113
#42
Smoke said:
Sort of true but sort of false.

You can refuse service to anyone for any reason UNLESS they are discriminating against a federally protected class. Some states, California for example, expand on the protected class and include political affiliation. Of course there are loopholes that can and will be used by these big social media corporations. They have the means to get by quite easily unfortunately.
Click to expand...

that is not true, once the courts have ruled on that case from precedence then you will know if it is a violation of rights. Context of the case.
 
CS1

CS1

Well-known member
#43
May 23, 2012
13,003
4,315
113
#43
Dude653 said:
Except it was Trump and his followers who radicalized these peopleby convincing them that the election had been stolen from them when they in fact legitimately lost
Google made the decision parler due to their failure to moderate hate speech and threats of violence
this is how the free market works. A business can decide not to do business with someone else
Click to expand...
no it was not that was the Antifa BLM who did it. The only thing the POTUS did was give them an opportunity to do what they wanted Trump to do all summer. The POTUS said protest Peacefully. the media would not even play it where he said that repeatedly. And the election was stolen YOU really think Biden got more votes than Obama did? LOL hahaha, Trump kicked the DNC behind they used a pandemic to cheat.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#44
Mar 19, 2011
12,660
1,094
113
#44
CS1 said:
no it was not that was the Antifa BLM who did it. The only thing the POTUS did was give them an opportunity to do what they wanted Trump to do all summer. The POTUS said protest Peacefully. the media would not even play it where he said that repeatedly. And the election was stolen YOU really think Biden got more votes than Obama did? LOL hahaha, Trump kicked the DNC behind they used a pandemic to cheat.
Click to expand...
nope there is zero evidence to suggest that antifa had anything to do with this
one of the first things they called does is convince you that everyone else is lying
Everyone is lying except Trump...riiiiiggt
 
CS1

CS1

Well-known member
#45
May 23, 2012
13,003
4,315
113
#45
Dude653 said:
nope there is zero evidence to suggest that antifa had anything to do with this
one of the first things they called does is convince you that everyone else is lying
Everyone is lying except Trump...riiiiiggt
Click to expand...
wrong there is plenty of evidence and many have already come out and said so. The FBI for one.
 
CS1

CS1

Well-known member
#46
May 23, 2012
13,003
4,315
113
#46
Smoke said:
That's not what "civil" in civil court means whatsoever. Often times civil cases don't even involve breaking the law, but rather a financial compensation due to someone elses negligence or actions.
Click to expand...
there are many people in jail for violating one's civil rights.
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#47
Jul 3, 2015
59,837
29,210
113
#47
Dude653 said:
this is how the free market works. A business can decide not to do business with someone else
Click to expand...
Really? A cake baker comes to mind. Do you remember?

The courts got involved because a gay couple wanted to force a
Christian baker to make them something that was not on his menu.

He was willing to sell them anything he had available,
but that was not good enough for the gay couple.

So they sued. Thank God they lost.

The case went all the way to the Supreme Court.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#48
Mar 19, 2011
12,660
1,094
113
#48
CS1 said:
there are many people in jail for violating one's civil rights.
Click to expand...
You don't have a civil right to someone else's property or services
 
CS1

CS1

Well-known member
#49
May 23, 2012
13,003
4,315
113
#49
Dude653 said:
Except it was Trump and his followers who radicalized these peopleby convincing them that the election had been stolen from them when they in fact legitimately lost
Google made the decision parler due to their failure to moderate hate speech and threats of violence
this is how the free market works. A business can decide not to do business with someone else
Click to expand...

"Hate speech" is a lie created by the socialist left., Anyone who disagrees with a Democrat is hate speech. saying the following is hate speech to aa democrats leader today and Bernie Sander AOC socialist here is hate speech to these foolish leaders:

  1. saying homosexuality is a sin
  2. using the words HE, SHE, Mother, father
  3. saying sexual preference
  4. saying BLM and ANTIFA are rioters
  5. saying All lives matter
  6. Voting and supporting President Trump
  7. calling the China virus the " China Virus".
  8. asking for voter ID in all states
  9. asking for all to come in legally into the United States
  10. having restrooms for males and females only
  11. preventing transgender child abuse
  12. Being a Conservative Christian
  13. teach the Bible as the word of God
and that is just off the top of my head.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#51
Mar 19, 2011
12,660
1,094
113
#51
Magenta said:
Really? A cake baker comes to mind. Do you remember?

The courts got involved because a gay couple wanted to force a
Christian baker to make them something that was not on his menu.

He was willing to sell them anything he had available,
but that was not good enough for the gay couple.

So they sued. Thank God they lost.

The case went all the way to the Supreme Court.
Click to expand...
Gay wedding cake versus inciting insurrection
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#52
Jul 3, 2015
59,837
29,210
113
#52
Dude653 said:
Gay wedding cake versus inciting insurrection
Click to expand...
The principle you cited was:

A business can decide not to do business with someone else

So can a business owner decide, or not? Many think not.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#53
Mar 19, 2011
12,660
1,094
113
#53
Magenta said:
So all the ant-discrimination laws are what?
Click to expand...
oh yeah stop discriminating against me. All I'm doing is going on social media calling for violence insurrection
 
CS1

CS1

Well-known member
#54
May 23, 2012
13,003
4,315
113
#54
Dude653 said:
You don't have a civil right to someone else's property or services
Click to expand...
remember that when you socialist types want us to give up our so-called wealth for the betterment of all. Don't get mad when some start to use force to keep what you just said was not yours to give to a dead beat. Rember that when CNN lied and was sued for wrongfully asserting hate to a young catholic boy who sued them BIG time. YOu can use your business any way you like but you can't use tax dollars and protection that come from Congress and the Senate and suppose to be working under the Consumer laws they do not get the breaks once they violate the laws. The Democrats can laugh it up right now but they are in for a big awaking that will make the "woke " movement look like a nat on camel's back.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#56
Mar 19, 2011
12,660
1,094
113
#56
CS1 said:
homocakes versus violation of free speech
Click to expand...
For the 55 millionth time there's no such thing as free speech on social media.
You agree to their terms and conditions upon creating your account
I say we let the free market decide what is or isn't acceptable
Imagine I ran a restaurant and refuse service to black people. It wouldn't take long before I was out of business
 
CS1

CS1

Well-known member
#57
May 23, 2012
13,003
4,315
113
#57
Dude653 said:
For the 55 millionth time there's no such thing as free speech on social media.
You agree to their terms and conditions upon creating your account
I say we let the free market decide what is or isn't acceptable
Imagine I ran a restaurant and refuse service to black people. It wouldn't take long before I was out of business
Click to expand...
FYI Free speech is what happens on social media do you pay for Twitter and Facebook? NO, you don't. Do you pay for the search engines like Google? No, you don't. SO you don't know what you're talking about.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#58
Mar 19, 2011
12,660
1,094
113
#58
CS1 said:
FYI Free speech is what happens on social media do you pay for Twitter and Facebook? NO, you don't. Do you pay for the search engines like Google? No, you don't. SO you don't know what you're talking about.
Click to expand...
yeah you still have your first amendment rights. Just do it on another platform as Google is under no obligation to give you a platform
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#59
Mar 19, 2011
12,660
1,094
113
#59
CS1 said:
FYI Free speech is what happens on social media do you pay for Twitter and Facebook? NO, you don't. Do you pay for the search engines like Google? No, you don't. SO you don't know what you're talking about.
Click to expand...
social media sites like Facebook and Twitter are mostly paid for by advertisements and sponsors
I'm not sure what that has to do with them having the right to enforce theirterms and conditions that you will agree to upon creating your account
 
CS1

CS1

Well-known member
#60
May 23, 2012
13,003
4,315
113
#60
Dude653 said:
yeah you still have your first amendment rights. Just do it on another platform as Google is under no obligation to give you a platform
Click to expand...
FYI Google provides a platform for liberals therefore they discriminate
 
You must log in or register to reply here.