Perhaps you're not listening![]()
Do you believe a new version is the word of God? If so, which one?
Perhaps you're not listening![]()
I would direct your attention once again to the 1611 Preface to the Reader. Your refusal to accept reality doesn't change reality.
I guess all the people who openly oppose the KJV being the only relevant Bible out there don't count as "anyone."![]()
Yes. I like the NIV best but there is no reason to pick just one when God has blessed us with several.Do you believe a new version is the word of God? If so, which one?
I proved my case, look up any lexicon you will see what I posted as the defenitions.No serious issues, but I am speaking of "early copies" and not necessarily the English translation. I presented my case with evidence coming from unbiased sources even from different versions. I asked a link or sources of your definition but you don't want to link me why? and what you are saying is that I don't know Greek and you are correct. Mine is only a product of researched and study. You speak to me in a very nice way "good day sir" "dude" while giving me an impression been involved in a cult-or worshipping an idol but I do understand that because you are still unprepared in presenting evidence. Lastly, I don't need to support my case this time because after all you have no case. Fair enough...
He is baiting you sis, best to leave well enough alone you will never convince himYes. I like the NIV best but there is no reason to pick just one when God has blessed us with several.
Yes, we are back on the merry-go-roundHe is baiting you sis, best to leave well enough alone you will never convince him
I consider Jesus to be the Holy Living Word of God.Do you know of someone who believes a new version Bible is the holy word of God?
After their previous holder was banned, the awards for "Most Obtuse" and "Least Teachable" soon found another worthy recipient.The preface is opinion, not Scripture.
is this what you are refering to: https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6215946537001I don't have any details, that's why I'm gonna focus on that for a while. What I know is there are Chinese troops in Canada and major US troop movement in the US. It's also been reported that China is supplying BLM and ANTIFA with fully automatic assault weapons.
Some are saying US troop movement is due to Trump getting troops in place for implementation of the Insurrection Act and taking control of the American government. I lean more toward a Chinese invasion right now because the Chinese are on our border and they are arming their proxy soldiers - BLM and ANTIFA.
Something is up and seems to be coming soon.
here you go: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Circular-ReasoningIf you don't know what it is, please look it up. You would have the honour of being the first KJV-onlyist who did.
is this what you are refering to: https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6215946537001
Yes. I like the NIV best but there is no reason to pick just one when God has blessed us with several.
I consider Jesus to be the Holy Living Word of God.
The revealed written Word of God comes in multiple languages and translations.
Your opinion that the KJV is superior to all others is based on nothing more than your preference.
After their previous holder was banned, the awards for "Most Obtuse" and "Least Teachable" soon found another worthy recipient.
He is baiting you sis, best to leave well enough alone you will never convince him
i don't watch skynews much, unless the news story, such as this one, gets my attention, or i miss what the headline was. there is also abcnews24, which may not have the same news stories as skynews. i will clarify, that its not necessarily "always" the samne news storys that abc and sky have. the journalists are different so, different news for different networks.I don't know why but Sky News Australia is different than the ultra-left wing biased Sky News we have in The UK.
I look at their reports often. They must have different management or something.
Our Sky makes me want to chuck the telly out of the window.
question for you Dino, are you a nasb "onlyist" ?Um... clearly you didn't read what I wrote, but glossed over it.
As to post 824:
"
Matthew 9:17 - NASB / wineskins - KJV / bottles
Matthew 1:11 - NASB / deportation - KJV / carried away
Luke 6:22 - NASB / ostracize - KJV / separate you from their company
1 Thes. 2:18 - NASB / thwarted - KJV / hindered
1 Tim. 3:3 - NASB / pugnacious - KJV / striker
1 Tim. 3:8 - NASB / sordid - KJV / filthy
1 Tim. 6:16 - NASB / a pang - KJV / sorrows
Hebrews 7:2 - NASB / apportioned - KJV / gave
Hebrews 12:1 - NASB / encumbrance - KJV / weight
Revelation 6:8 - NASB / ashen - KJV / pale
Revelation 18:1 - NASB / illumined - KJV / lightened
EVERY SINGLE ONE of the words you highlighted from the NASB is in my everyday vocabulary.
Whereas...
- "bottles" is misleading, because the KJV word does not refer to glass containers;
- "separate you from their company" is verbose;
- "striker" is misleading as it's not in current usage in that sense;
- "gave" is less precise than "apportioned";
- "weight" in that context is inferior to "encumbrance" which encompasses a wider range of possible causes;
- "lightened" is misleading because the term today means "made less heavy".
You have no argument... as usual.
Not at all. It just happens to be the version that I primarily use at this point. At other times, I have used the KJV, the Living Bible, and the NIV.question for you Dino, are you a nasb "onlyist" ?