E
eternally-gratefull
Guest
NopeNone of these are true in the KJV. If one allows it to interpret itself, all questions are answered.
already proved this logic is flawed
continue to believe as you wish.
NopeNone of these are true in the KJV. If one allows it to interpret itself, all questions are answered.
If God doesn't elevate the originals, should we?
Really? How so?That seems to me is the real cult.
Or better yet,
no other cult is worshiping an interpretation created in a flawed language,
god did not elevate an English text created in the 1600’s either
so why do you?
once again your circular logic comes back to bite you
Sometimes, you write the silliest things. For some reason that I can't fathom, you seem to enjoy displaying your ignorance, closed-mindedness, and resistance to truth.That's my point. No other version is trusted by their readers as the word of God.
Fallacy: equivocation...If God doesn't elevate the originals, should we?
Just when I think you might be starting to see the light, you willfully shut your eyes.You expect me to believe God can not or will not translate his word into other languages because YOU say so.... I don't think so.
like I said it’s sad.Fallacy: equivocation...
AGAIN.
You do know the whole "cult" thing is silly. Think about it, I actually believe I have the preserved word of God in the KJV. You call that a cult?
Sometimes, you write the silliest things. For some reason that I can't fathom, you seem to enjoy displaying your ignorance, closed-mindedness, and resistance to truth.
like I said it’s sad.
Let me figure this out. Original language mainly used in the New Testament is Greek and that Original language is now not being used today for common people. Common people knows nothing about it. Literally, it's UNKNOWN to them. Kneeling your knees on the language we don't know and bending yourselves to it is like going to some worship like the Athenians with their devotions "TO THE UNKNOWN GOD" Acts 17:23.Really? How so?
how are people who say we should take all sources God has given us to properly be able to understand what he said a cult and people who worship an old debunk English text as perfect not?
So insteadLet me figure this out. Original language mainly used in the New Testament is Greek and that Original language is now not being used today for common people. Common people knows nothing about it. Literally, it's UNKNOWN to them. Kneeling your knees on the language we don't know and bending yourselves to it is like going to some worship like the Athenians with their devotions "TO THE UNKNOWN GOD" Acts 17:23.![]()
And yet KJ English is alive and kicking well unlike the original language. Yes they have been so used by God in their time, era yet they are not being used as of today for the common people. Of course, I am trying to comment on those original language fanatics and perhaps you are not one.So instead
we point them to an English Bible, which by its very essence is flawed, and worse yet we take them to an outdated English language which has not been used for years. (Except for cultists who demand its perfect)
seems to me your very argument can be used against you
once again, no one is saying use those languages by the,selves, we say use all tools.
it’s amazing god has given us so much, and people get angry and attack those who understand a flawed bible is flawed, and want to use every source available to make sure they understand fully what was written
So with this, we can then compare KJV English with New Versions one. Am I correct with my understanding? ThanksSo instead
we point them to an English Bible, which by its very essence is flawed, and worse yet we take them to an outdated English language which has not been used for years. (Except for cultists who demand its perfect)
Oh it is, in what world?And yet KJ English is alive and kicking well unlike the original language. Yes they have been so used by God in their time, era yet they are not being used as of today for the common people. Of course, I am trying to comment on those original language fanatics and perhaps you are not one.![]()
Well we could, but they use the same flawed language so it may not help you get the full meaning of a particular passage.So with this, we can then compare KJV English with New Versions one. Am I correct with my understanding? Thanks
Umm, now you are going to original text when those text has since long gone. Are you trying to let me in the Original text cult? It might outdated according to the rest of the world, according to your opinion but it's neve been held wrong in its text. The seemeth wrong can be studied and understood, unlike newer ones mixed and adulterated. The word change one to another water downs interpretation.Oh it is, in what world?
oh that’s right,in the KJV only cults world
for,the rest of the world, it’s outdated
qnd even if it was not, the language used to write it is flawed.
so in either case, you have a not perfect interpretation of the origional text.
ie, you just like the rest of the world
welcome to reality