SCOTUS, before Ginsburg died was 4 Liberals, 4 Conservatives and John Roberts who swings either way.
There are many lawsuits that have been filed and not gotten to the Supreme Court. In order for a case to be heard by the Supreme Court a party in the lawsuit has to petition the Court for a hearing. The Court receives hundreds of petitions every year, some petitions are heard and others are denied. There is a process but nothing in our laws says that the Court has to hear a case. They could just deny a hearing and the case reverts back to the lower court.
I’m Pro-life and very much anti-abortion (Murder even up to the ninth month). This is unimaginable.
Your response leaves me unsure about how you have comprehended what I said. I have not said that a process can be forced through the court system. You’re of course correct about the high court being able to deny a petition. So far so good. What is mysterious, is the undeniable fact that if you research petitions regarding abortion, you will find very few, if any, with a solid funding that could, given the circumstances, have a chance to reach the SCOTUS.
When such funding lacks, a petition will not be filed. Now, if someone in the “money is not an issue”-segment, various parts of Republican politicians or organizations for example, would guarantee that the expenses would be covered, there would be filed petitions in an amount that would increase the possibility of being admitted to the SCOTUS.