Global warming theory is "false science"
- Thread starter MyrtleTrees
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I simply gave a recording of above zero, two, in fact, which you say never happens.
No need to go Rambo on me
No need to go Rambo on me
-
1
- Show all
lol, I'm so old I remember back when everyone knew America was a continent and not a country, divided into north,central and southern regions. Back then we referred to this nation as "the United States of America" so as to not confuse it with the other countries in the Americas,,,those days are gone...
I remember when Americans would pose as Canadians while foreign traveling because they knew they would be treated better
-
1
- Show all
Sorry, I always said North , Central or South America talking about continents.. I'll start saying 'USA' if I can remember
Hey it's no big deal here in the states I know what you mean because it's been used as slang my whole life. If you ever sail up to a nation in central or south America and they ask where your from do not say "America" or they will assume you are avoiding the answer and will point out that they are American also,lol... and then tow your vessel to port and detain you until they clear things all up.
In all actuality the issue of MMGW is something that the two opposing sides of science are debating among themselves anyway. That is I've read a lot of things on the www that they debate back and forth but I have never seen a scientist suggest to another that they look on the Christian forums for our opinions. Other than that it's not like we would have any input into their decision anyway.
Minoan Warm Period
Roman Warm Period
https://andymaypetrophysicist.files...entral_greenland_temperature_since-4000bp.pdf
Roman Warm Period
https://andymaypetrophysicist.files...entral_greenland_temperature_since-4000bp.pdf
I haven't really pondered it much but in glancing at things online it seems to me to be from an era when men were transitioning from thinking the earth was flat and not yet grasping the earth as a globe with a north and south pole. To me,and I mean a view point of sailing a vessel along the coast, his map would be only an general depiction. So six feet knots on a rope or you would understand why so many vessels ran aground or sank during those years of exploration.
To me though my take of the map is that it was intended to denote the seas and their depths more accurately than the land masses to so that the shorelines could found. If you have never sailed across a body of water you may not see what I'm trying to describe so I'll explain. It's like the old saying a circle with a dot in it, most people look at it when ask what they see and point straight to the dot.
Your asking me about Piri Reis map of Antartica https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piri_Reis_map but that means that you look at the map and your focus is on the land but I shake my head because it isn't a map of the land at all it is a map of the ocean and waters between the continents. This is a map drawn Ottoman Admiral (a sailor) and so if you erase the things that you have read that suggest it is a map of the land and look at it again you will clearly see it is not intended to accurately depict the inwards of the land masses but instead the water. In short it is a map of the Atlantic,Caribbean ect. and not of what many are suggested to think it is.
To me though my take of the map is that it was intended to denote the seas and their depths more accurately than the land masses to so that the shorelines could found. If you have never sailed across a body of water you may not see what I'm trying to describe so I'll explain. It's like the old saying a circle with a dot in it, most people look at it when ask what they see and point straight to the dot.
Your asking me about Piri Reis map of Antartica https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piri_Reis_map but that means that you look at the map and your focus is on the land but I shake my head because it isn't a map of the land at all it is a map of the ocean and waters between the continents. This is a map drawn Ottoman Admiral (a sailor) and so if you erase the things that you have read that suggest it is a map of the land and look at it again you will clearly see it is not intended to accurately depict the inwards of the land masses but instead the water. In short it is a map of the Atlantic,Caribbean ect. and not of what many are suggested to think it is.
-
1
- Show all