For his divine purposes and will and his good pleasure ?
Do we fully understand His purposes?
For his divine purposes and will and his good pleasure ?
There was no new testament when the apostles delivered the good news. The way of Messiah was an oral tradition.
A unrated man cannot believe the Gospel unless he is regenerated first . Only those whom God has 'elected 'in eternity past does he cause belief in those he saves .
Its not my job to convince you of the connection to Calvinism and gnosctism. I've mentioned a few links and I'm sure you can search this out on your own time . I do see the connection and I'm certain why Calvinism believes what it believes.
Not true. Think about that. Acts 2
I would absolutely disagree and think that’s a terrible idea to insist we don’t need to believe what God said about being saved .
but I think it’s okay to disagree sometimes . God bless and he did indeed die for our sins and was raised up from the dead . That’s very true
but to be saved I would go with what Jesus said about the matter
“And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.”
Mark 16:15-16
I understand we all Have our own opinions I believe the Bible carries a clear message that we should believe in Jesus “opinion “ about salvation . But my faith is in him so that should make sense why I believe what he said about salvation being that he is the only one who can give salvation .
“Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.”
John 5:24 KJV
That’s a pretty hard thing to say “ naw Jesus didn’t get it “ I’m positive he does get it and told the truth about it . Not a great idea to go with the salvation that is different from the salvation the savior provided and said there was no mother way
I just quoted the verse ?
I believe in baptism. Every believer ought to be baptized unless circumstance hinders it ( like thief on the cross) I just don’t think a person needs to wait around to be baptized in order to receive eternal life. The scripture says that whoever believes HAS eternal life
In addition, if a person believes and dies before baptism, they go to heaven. Because eternal life is through believing and salvation is by faith ( Eph 2:10) not baptism
Also, Paul said he was not sent to baptize but to preach the gospel. Would he have said that if baptism was part of the “ power of God unto salvation” gospel?
amen, God will save ALL that He intends to save.
Speaking of "Knowledge of the Holy" that is a great book to read by A. W. Tozer.
I see a lot of scripture quoting without noting the context. If you have to scripture pick to prove your point, you have no point.
also
What Jesus says to his apostles on acting as apostles is not the same as what the disciples are given to do. We are all disciples who are born again, ready to learn and grow in knowledge of the Holy.
Correct. Romans 8: 28-30.
Those whom He foreknew in eternity past will infallibly be saved. I agree with this, but stop short of double predestination.
Is this in reference to my posts on the great commission?
i have heard a lot about that book, but haven’t read it.
The Bible of the early church was the Tanach. They did have oral traditions, but all that we need has been encapsulated in God’s Word and the canon of scripture was complete by the late first to early second century, somewhere in there. God saw to it.
The writers of the new testament gospels are anonymous.The scriptures of the old testament were often quoted by the writers of the NEW. How can you say they have no scriptures?
Election and predestination are really easy to explain from the bible . They are both something that only applies AFTER conversion . Not before . Election = purpose and service. This is easy to understand. I'm not wrestling with anything lol . Its barely a thing , compared with predestination..Predestination is our assurance of our adoption to come . Rom 8.23 / Eph 1.5God has elected whos, not what’s in eternity past. Ephesians 1:4. It’s best to just accept that and not wrestle with it too much.
Do I fully understand election? Of course not. Anyone who says they do does not understand what the Bible teaches about election at all. I don’t worry about it. I don’t wrestle with the doctrine of election any more than I struggle with the doctrine of the Trinity, which I also fully believe without fully understanding.
I don’t need to understand something to believe it. The Bible says it is all I need.
I am saved by faith, not by the extent of my knowledge.
Timothy speaking of the Tanakh as we know.2 Timothy 3:16-17
scripture is the only thing we possess that is God breathed
Only God is infallible
Therefore, only scripture is infallible
Election is to service, calling and purpose, not to salvation. (Isa. 42:1; Acts 9:15; Rom. 11:28)God has elected whos, not what’s in eternity past. Ephesians 1:4. It’s best to just accept that and not wrestle with it too much.
Do I fully understand election? Of course not. Anyone who says they do does not understand what the Bible teaches about election at all. I don’t worry about it. I don’t wrestle with the doctrine of election any more than I struggle with the doctrine of the Trinity, which I also fully believe without fully understanding.
I don’t need to understand something to believe it. The Bible says it is all I need.
I am saved by faith, not by the extent of my knowledge.
I didn't interpret it . I just quoted it ?Then we don't agree on your interpretation. You constantly fail to understand the CONTEXT.
I see no agreement anywhere between us.