I prefer Scriptural Salvation.
From Got Questions folks. Also addresses easy believerism. Less than 8 minutes.
This is ridiculous. He purposely blurs the line between salvation and service.
Once saved, should we serve the Lord?
Of course.
The Bible calls that our "reasonable service" (Romans 12:1). But it is not required to remain saved or prove we are saved.
In Acts 16:30-31 the Philippian jailer asks Paul and Silas a direct question: "Sirs, what must I do to be saved?"
Here was a
golden opportunity for Paul to tell the jailer "you must repent, be baptized, put your hand to the plow, surrender all, never look back, be zealous for good works", etc., etc.
But no. Paul said to simply "
believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved."
Now, did Paul tell the truth? If so, then that's all that must be done. If it's not true, Paul purposely deceived the jailer, and he was not saved.
So, if believing is all that is required to be saved, why in the world do people then say, "now you have to do works to stay/prove you're saved"? How many good works are required? Does God grade on a curve. When does one know they've done enough?
You can't know. Which is why so many Christians live in fear and uncertainty. Wondering if they are truly saved.
Why can't people accept that salvation is a gift from beginning to end? Why do they insist works must be involved? If good works prove one is saved, then Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Roman Catholics, even many atheists are saved because they leave most born again Christians in the dust when it comes to good works and charity.
Jesus answered the question of works quite clearly:
"Then they asked him, “What must we do to do the
works God
requires?”
Jesus answered, “The work of God is this:
to believe in the one he has sent.” (John 6:28-29)
That's it, and that's all.