Then this leads you to another error in the translation since not all of NWT has all the upper letter GOD or GODS that you are saying. Your assumption that older COPIES written in UPPER case letters, majuscules or uncial got it right and they are representative of the original copies. You seem not to understand that even though those 6th Ce manuscript display the true font rendering since these copies are independent to each other and were copies and copies of the originals so called which had over time had witnesses are more than what you imagine.All Greek manuscripts prior to the 6th century were written in either ‘uncial’ or ‘majuscule’, that meant all letters were written with all capital letters, this is irrefutable, to deny this would be to deny all Greek manuscripts prior to the 6th century. Manuscripts written in ‘miniscule’ only partially coming around in the 6th century and were not fully developed until the 9th century. The bulk of the Greek manuscripts are newer copies, and thus written in ‘miniscule’ as earlier manuscripts are both harder to find, as there were less written as Christianity was not as widespread, and because manuscripts deteriorate and get lost due to damage more over time. We know the 1CE manuscripts, which no one has, were written in uncial as ALL the writings from the bible in Greek which are extra-biblical are written as such, none are written in ‘miniscule’, so my justification is precise.
(1 Cor 8:4-6) “..THERE IS NO GOD BUT ONE." FOR EVEN IF THERE ARE SO-CALLED GODS, WHETHER IN HEAVEN OR ON EARTH (AS INDEED THERE ARE MANY "GODS" AND MANY "LORDS"), YET FOR US THERE IS BUT ONE GOD, THE FATHER..”
I have made no error in calling Jesus GOD and the Father GOD, me applying the term ‘GOD’ to both Jesus and the Father no more is an oxymoron than me highlighting Satan is called “THE GOD” (2 Cor 4:4), Moses was called GOD (Exo 7:1), Angels were called GODS (Ps 8:5), or a human King was called GOD (Ps 45:6), the term GOD being applied to them does not necessitate equalling the ‘one God’ the Father.
All glory goes to GodTranslation;
"Ma'am that there sword you swing....that thing is too sharp...ouch"
I live right in the neighborhood of the Hill kimora. Jehovah witnesses are all around me. They are a cult.
They are not allowed nor practice reading the Bible they have a second Bible which was written by Joseph Smith that they follow.
Joseph Smith said that the Bible was incorrect. That Satan had corrupted the written word.
They believe that Jesus came to the Americas after his Ascension and gave Joseph Smith the true vision.
Need I go any further?
The are many gods but only one God. Many fakes but only one genuine article. Many call themselves Christian but they are not genuine. You can sit in the garage and call yourself a car but that does not mean you are the genuine article.
If Jesu Christ is not Jehovah God incarnate then Jesus Christ would have been a fraud. That Jesus Christ rose from the dead bodily is proof that He was the genuine article.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
You got her on eggshells too?
Me thinks you are getting routed by Gods word.
Your real is not bible centered so anyone with a bible gets your feelings hurt.
NWL,
Since you avoided my post concerning how you arrive at your Oneness belief, I will ask this:
You claim the JWs are familiar with the Ancient Hebrew. The most used word in the first Chapters of the Book of Genesis is the word "BEGAT." Begat is a term APPLIED directly to a man, a woman, and the creation of a child between them.
Now, we know when the WORD (Jesus) was BEGAT, along with the WISDOM (Holy Spirit), there were No women and men to create children yet because Adam and Eve was not yet Created.
So, that means the term BEGAT towards the WORD (Jesus) and the WISDOM (Holy Spirit) do not apply to the offspring of a man and woman.
That automatically takes us to to the SECOND HEBREW BEGAT DEFINITION.
That is PURPOSE!
God BEGAT, or brought forth the WORD (Jesus) and the WISDOM (Holy Spirit) for a specific PURPOSE!
We know that Purpose was as CREATOR, SALVATION, RESURRECTION, ADVOCATE, COMFORTER, SPIRITUAL GIFTS, CONNECTION TO GOD, TO CONFIRM THE WORDS OF CHRIST, EVENTUAL JUDGE!
So Jesus is not Created, because before the BEGINNING, God took a part of HIMSELF and for a PURPOSE 2nd definition BEGAT the WORD and the WISDOM.
So I ask you, how can you claim and the JW's claim to understand the Ancient Hebrew Language, when you are applying the human definition of BEGAT to GOD?
If you don't know the difference in the BEGAT's, how do you think you know the other Hebrew terms you have defined to be correct?
Providing Scriptures that clearly show Jesus is God is Bible bashing? Why don't YOU pick one of the many verses I gave to discuss? There are certainly a lot of them you would have to ignore not to see that Scripture attests to Jesus being God. LOL @ me fighting the Bible, when you are the one denying what it says![]()
Not only that, your NWT makes JWs out to be polytheists.
Not true NWL, John 1:1 is "NOT" referring to the Genesis 1:1 beginning and here is why? Both references at Genesis 1:1 and at John 1:1 start out as "in beginning." The definite article "the" is not in the text original text.
So, Genesis 1:1 states, "In beginning" God created the heavens and the earth" John 1:1 states, "In beginning" was the Wor4d, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God," (I don't see the words "a god" anywhere in the text.) I do see, "and the Word was God." Like I said both verses start out with "in beginning."
The main thought in Genesis 1:1 is "WHAT HAPPENED" in the beginning. The main thought at John 1:1 the emphasis is on "WHO EXISTED" in the beginning. So the beginning at Genesis 1:1 is referring to when time began and God created the heavens and the earth. This means that at John 1:1 the beginning antecedes the Genesis "beginning" because God is eternal and He has not beginning.
Just like what He said at Exodus 3:14, "I AM WHO I AM." Or to put it another way, "I EXIST," period. And btw, quit changing what I said about the angels being there with God. The point is the fact that angels "DID NOT" have a hand in creating a darn thing. That's why "BY MYSELF" AND "ALL ALONE" mean just that.
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
Excuse me if I missed your post, I've been coming back to the forum every now and again to over ten posts directed at me, many by trolls, and I either do not see the post, forget, or do not have the time to respond to everyone.
Firstly, I have nowhere claimed JW's know ancient Hebrew, secondly, I've never applied the term 'begat' to God, where have I done this?
By answering your questions I would be admitting to things I have not done or believe, please rephrase and ask again.
Well, you didn't address anything I said to you, you just seem to throw more scriptures into the works to try and prove what you have claimed, this is what I meant by bible bashing and fighting scripture with scripture. I never said you were 'fighting the bible', nor did I call you a bible basher directly but clearly stated us, by my usage of "we", to show I was not trying to insult.
The ball is in your court, the onus is own you to pick a verse that supports your position, not me. I should again remind you I have no issue accepting Jesus is not God, he simply isn't the "one God", I've made this ever so clear in my post but seems to get dismissed a lot.
It appears you are not here for honest discussion, you're simply fighting the bible with the bible which is good for nothing. If you wish to engage with me please pick a scripture or two that you think best supports what you say and we can both discuss it civilly, and not like bible bashers.
Yes, I gave a lot of Scriptures because there are SO MANY that attest to the fact that God is the only Rock of salvation and that Jesus is the Rock of our salvation. If you sink under the sheer weight of that Rock, it can hardly be said to be my fault![]()
Yes, I gave a lot of Scriptures because there are SO MANY that attest to the fact that God is the only Rock of salvation and that Jesus is the Rock of our salvation. If you sink under the sheer weight of that Rock, it can hardly be said to be my faultThank you for showing to everyone I did not say you were 'fighting the bible' but rather "fighting the bible with the bible", the two statements are different and express different things. ''Fighting the bible' implies you are against the bible, whereas by me stating you were "fighting the bible with the bible" I was expressing you were fighting scripture with other scripture, as you weren't explaining why I was wrong but again, throwing more scripture into the mix.
Torture stake ? JW'S are liars with an agenda to control their slaves, come out from among them .. Print of the nail(S) in His hands from a crossThank you for showing to everyone I did not say you were 'fighting the bible' but rather "fighting the bible with the bible", the two statements are different and express different things. ''Fighting the bible' implies you are against the bible, whereas by me stating you were "fighting the bible with the bible" I was expressing you were fighting scripture with other scripture, as you weren't explaining why I was wrong but again, throwing more scripture into the mix.