The Holy Spirit never left.
The phrase
"Holy Spirit left" is a
misunderstanding [based on poor "rumors"] that this is what anyone is saying. It is not.
The Holy Spirit doesn't "leave" at the time of "our Rapture". His
"restraining at present" stops. And the consequences/aftermath unfolds upon the earth, following that point. Over a specific, limited future period of time, involving JUDGMENTS unfolding upon the earth.
Again, it's not that He "LEAVES," see.
Many people will "come to faith" FOLLOWING "our Rapture/'THE Departure'" IN/DURING the trib years (and sadly, as we know, many will not).
We are the temple not made with humans hands .
Paul never uses the "definite article ['the']" when referring to the Church
which is His body as
"temple".
Yet, at least 2 places in Scripture, that speaks of that future, specific, limited time period, where the phrase "
THE temple of God" is used... (but, again, that is referring to a specific time-period FOLLOWING the departure OF US in our Rapture--And we should ask ourselves, then, what is the problem with something being called "THE temple of God" on the earth FOLLOWING our EXIT from the earth?? ['temple'...
not 'THE temple']); and in the second place it's mentioned, makes it abundantly clear that "
THE TEMPLE of God" and "THEM that worship THEREIN" are two distinct entities.
What are those waiting a thousand years for a different kind of Spirit of Christ?
Again, He's not "leaving" (that's not exactly accurate!) Stop repeating that error. Put it clearly in your notes at the top of your screen, so as to not inadvertently repeat something that is not actual. His
role will change from "
restraining at present" (and permanently "SEALing" the Church which is His body [we'll be IN HEAVEN at that point!], etc... but when you read John 7:39 and Ephesians 1:13-14 "UNTIL" and Ephesians 4:30 "UNTO," you can see that there is no problem with the idea that His role will change from "
restraining AT PRESENT" (etc), to that which will be His role on the earth
then [FUTURE]).
So your question, here, makes no sense to me.
Take note again what Ezekiel 37:12-14,20-23 says (about Israel in that future trib years period of time and following). The trib is for the purpose of bringing Israel into the New Covenant. PPL tend to "READ THEMSELVES INTO" passages meant to/for/about THEM/ISRAEL (usurping Israel's role and place and blessings--Don't do that.
)
The Amil position works the best .Thousand years a unknown. the signified understand just like the rest of the metaphors used in that parable. (Revelation 20)
At the time Jesus spoke His Olivet Discourse, He had said "no man knows [not even Himself, at the time]"; "PERFECT indicative".
Later, AFTER His "resurrection/ascension," He supplied FURTHER REVELATION in the [later] 95ad "[The] Revelation," disclosing a great many details regarding TIMING-markers, and DAY-AMOUNT indicators, and various other "connections" of that sort...
...where Revelation 1:1 says, "[The] Revelation
of Jesus Christ, WHICH GOD GAVE UNTO HIM [unto Jesus] TO SHEW UNTO His servants [see 7:3] things which must come to pass
IN QUICKNESS [NOUN]..."
so that "further information" *on that very Subject* HAS BEEN DISCLOSED some nearly 60-yrs after His resurrection/ascension (the Subject of Matt24:36 and related passages which had said "no one knows [PERFECT indicative]" NOT that no one WOULD EVER KNOW / CAN EVER KNOW / WILL EVER KNOW / [all are] FORBIDDEN TO KNOW. NO! Jesus now KNOWS [ever since His resurrection/ascension] and has provided FURTHER INFORMATION on THAT very thing!
Some day, when there are those who will find themselves IN the trib, and many will have come to faith (FOLLOWING "our Rapture"), people will have the ability to come to "understand" that very thing,
IF they will
HEED HIS WORD [and/or listen to those bringing it]. Some will, but again (as we know from what Scripture tells of of that future, specific, limited time period leading UP TO His Second Coming
to the earth Rev19), many will not.
