Jaybo did you know that false gospels were in circulation at the same time the real gospels were being written?
Yes.
Jaybo did you know that false gospels were in circulation at the same time the real gospels were being written?
And yet the more early manuscripts we find the more we have to compare, and by comparing we can come closer to the originals.
Can you give an example of a "blatant contradiction"? If two translations don't agree then obviously you must prefer one over the other. I intentionally read several translations; I prefer the NET, the NIV, the NRSV, the ESV, and the 1599 Geneva Bible, in that order.
This is what we are arguing about lol.... some people don't believe the word of Truth exists today.looks like a lot of time that has been spent in here making
personal declarations could be better spent -
11TIM. 2:15.
Study to show yourself approved unto God, a workman that needs not to be ashamed, rightly dividing The Word of Truth.
16.
But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
23.
But foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they do gender strifes.
The other versions, revisions, or translations lack perceived contradictions and errors? My favorite is the NKJV and my perception is that it contains no contradictions and errors.This is only applied to the KJV.![]()
I think that's exactly how God wants us to do it, find the one that we don't see any contradictions and errors and stick with it ONLY. If you believe the NKJV has no errors and you stick with it only, then you are doing it in the way that God intended.The other versions, revisions, or translations lack perceived contradictions and errors? My favorite is the NKJV and my perception is that it contains no contradictions and errors.
That's why the footnotes are provided; they explain the issues adequately.Lol, you can get this simple truth from reading the words of the KJV. You cannot get this truth from the new versions. They contradict themselves, thus, cannot be trusted for truth.
That makes every translation suspect... including the KJV. Might as well start learning Greek and Hebrew!Any translation of God's word WITHOUT God inspiring the translation is man's OPINION of God's word, it has nothing to do with the mind of God.
What you showed are examples where the actual text was translated, and further explanation was required.Correct! They must be examined for errors. I already showed you an error in the ESV and NASB. A faithful witness will not lie.
Or explain it away on the basis of your intractable belief that your version is correct.Ok, then when you come across a blatant contradiction then you should dump that version for another.
That's why the footnotes are provided; they explain the issues adequately.
Why is that you believe that God has never involved himself in the translation of his word?That makes every translation suspect... including the KJV. Might as well start learning Greek and Hebrew!
So the sidenotes in the KJV cast doubt on the text, plain and simple.Proof notes cast doubt on the text, plain and simple.

Why do you believe that He has only involved Himself in one translation?Why is that you believe that God has never involved himself in the translation of his word?
Because there's only one God, one Jesus, one way to God, one gospel, only one Old Testament scripture. Multiple translations don't bring more clarity to scripture, it causes people to look for alternate views when they don't like what one particular bible says.Why do you believe that He has only involved Himself in one translation?
Right back atcha.![]()
So you'll be using Tyndale henceforth? Your argument runs counter to your position.Because there's only one God, one Jesus, one way to God, one gospel, only one Old Testament scripture. Multiple translations don't bring more clarity to scripture, it causes people to look for alternate views when they don't like what one particular bible says.
Nothing about multiple bible versions lines up with the character of God and the way he works.
Tyndale never published a complete bible.So you'll be using Tyndale henceforth? Your argument runs counter to your position.![]()
See post #151
Because there's only one God, one Jesus, one way to God, one gospel, only one Old Testament scripture. Multiple translations don't bring more clarity to scripture, it causes people to look for alternate views when they don't like what one particular bible says.
Nothing about multiple bible versions lines up with the character of God and the way he works.