This does NOT change 2 Peter 2:5...Peter had already referred to the world that was overflowed by water, as Noahś flood, which indeed they were ignorant to and because they did not listen to Noah, a preacher of righteousness (which Peter also refers to in this letter) they did indeed perish
You referenced 2 Peter 2. initially as your support of another flood, but you left off 2 Peter 5 as the identifier of NOAH´S flood, when you used 2 Peter 2:6 as your support for this opinion....and you do understand that you can not separate 2 Peter 2 from 2 Peter 3.
The whole letter must be read in context for FULL understanding.
You referenced 2 Peter 2. initially as your support of another flood, but you left off 2 Peter 5 as the identifier of NOAH´S flood, when you used 2 Peter 2:6 as your support for this opinion....and you do understand that you can not separate 2 Peter 2 from 2 Peter 3.
The whole letter must be read in context for FULL understanding.
It actually does, you just reject it.