Yes.
The Bible is written to man, saved or not.
If you’re not saved, it equips you to be saved.
Once you are saved, it equips you for perfection in all good works and provides comfort until the day of redemption.
Okay, so in the
CONTEXT of the passage under discussion, it
contrasts "ye" and "them" (vv.3-4), and
contrasts "ye/we/us" with the "G3062 ['others' in kjv; 'left, left behind, the rest'--same Greek word as in 1Th4:13 speaking of the 'unsaved' who 'have no hope']" (vv.5-6), and
contrasts "they" and "us, who are of the day" (vv.7-9), and you are telling me
that verse 10 is communicating the EXACT SAME message [thought/idea/expression] that those other 12 verses are communicating (with regard to the word "WATCH"--that this verse is virtually IDENTICAL to what the other 12 verses are saying, in conveying the SAME THOUGHT/SAME "DIRECTION/instruction"/SAME MESSAGE) ??
I would say they are conveying
completely DISTINCT things (regarding the word
"WATCH").
And we are called to
distinguish the things that differ and that it is a right and good thing to be "
CORRECTLY APPORTION[-ing] the word of truth"...
applying it properly to whom it properly applies in any given context (this is
not to say we do not learn from ALL of it, things of value and application, but I'm referring to "application"
in a primary sense,
like the "SEE-[then]-FLEE" in the Lk21:12-24 section of the Olivet Discourse pertains to the events surrounding 70ad [NOT saying other parts of the Olivet Discourse aren't "FAR-future," they are!]--but are
not for
us to "SEE-[then]-FLEE" Lk21:23,20
THAT would be a WRONG APPLICATION, applying things
willy-nilly, not that there is NO lesson in it for us, just like our viewing the Exodus does, as well).
So I am not persuaded by your explanation, which sounds to me only like so much human reasoning.