Who should take you serious, if you are not able to answer, these easy questions?Just careful.
This I cant understand. For what reason you open this thread?
Who should take you serious, if you are not able to answer, these easy questions?Just careful.
I answer only what I understand.Who should take you serious, if you are not able to answer, these easy questions?
This I cant understand. For what reason you open this thread?
If we were secure in our faith there would be no question to hard.Who should take you serious, if you are not able to answer, these easy questions?
This I cant understand. For what reason you open this thread?
If you don’t understand our questions you have no business trying to tell us anythingI answer only what I understand.
I answer every question the best I can. Some are worth investing time in, others are not.If you don’t understand our questions you have no business trying to tell us anything
they are core belief and principle question. Not deep major doctrinal questions
this does not answer the question
will God restor the nation of Israel if they repent?
You have yet to answer most questions you just dodge themI answer every question the best I can. Some are worth investing time in, others are not.
You are joking!I answer only what I understand.
I'm serious. It's like signing a contract without reading it.You are joking!
Why criticize others when they answer the best they can?You have yet to answer most questions you just dodge them
again, if that’s the best you can do You should not be trying to tell people what to believe
I'm serious. It's like signing a contract without reading it.
Jesus is the lion of the tribe of Judah. So it's Judah.You can not tell to which tribe of israel you belong? And you cant say wether the book of revealation says lies ore not? You even not understand these questions?
Jesus is the lion of the tribe of Judah. So it's Judah.
So you belong to the tribe of Judah. And what is with my second question?Jesus is the lion of the tribe of Judah. So it's Judah.
If you only knewWhy criticize others when they answer the best they can?
Because God said I give you this and forever. As an eternal promise, and through this promise he would show the nations of the world he was God
He also made it specific in prophesy that Israel would rebel. He would punish them as he said he wold in Lev 26, But even then, he will NEVER forget them, and he will never forsake them, and he will ALWAYS remember his promise he made to them through their fathers. And that even AFTER he completely removes them from the land. They will repent, and he WILL remember his promise and in doing this, he WILL restor them.
why would I want to take these prophesies and somehow claim these are prophesies concerning the church, not Israel?
God does not go back on his promises.
and yes, He does use them as a symbol. To prove to the world you do what I ask, and live the way I want you to live, YOU WILL BE BLESSED.
And God will establish this truth through them still. Just like the prophets said he would.
It would be an ABSOLUTE fulfillment of prophecy if the "church" were biblical Israel.
It would be an ABSOLUTE fulfillment of prophecy if the land promises were a shadow of the Kingdom, as were all the things given and shown to the ancient Hebrews.
Romans 9:6-8
6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
Who is God making these promises to? Is it the children of the flesh? Or is it to the children of God?
You can’t even get your op right
dispensationalists teach removal theology
it just teaches as God promised if Israel repent, god will restore them
you need to stop listening to people and start studying
Ishmael?All that means is Ishmael is not part of the seed line. No mention of the Church. Salvation is not in the context. Your private interpretation is wrong. God elected who would fulfill the promise of the seed line.
The problem with this is it ignored most of OT prophecy and makes romans 11 pretty much meaninglessIt would be an ABSOLUTE fulfillment of prophecy if the "church" were biblical Israel.
It would be an ABSOLUTE fulfillment of prophecy if the land promises were a shadow of the Kingdom, as were all the things given and shown to the ancient Hebrews.
Romans 9:6-8
6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
Who is God making these promises to? Is it the children of the flesh? Or is it to the children of God?