Not By Works

[Discern]

From an outside view

Outside of what?

 

[EleventhHour]

The question was very straightforward. I am not the one who complicated things

Dcontroversal answered it. One of His answered it. You answered it. You and they did not even had to add caveats to it

Why couldn’t people answer a straightforward question straightforwardly? That’s what I’m wondering...

The answer was «both are possibilities. «Only four letters needed.

You guys were overthinking it.

So you have yourself a blessed day

Do they get a special reward?

I am really hoping they will share!!

 

[Lightskin]

Rejecting Jesus is immoral. Rejecting Jesus is immoral.

Interesting take.

 

[eternally-gratefull]

No I didn’t. I asked you if it was possible.

And there is a difference?

 

[Lightskin]

You mean you’re replying to a question and you don’t know what the question is?

I didn’t reply to a question. I replied to one of your posts regarding 1 John 3:10 but it was not a question. I told you you were confusing.

 

[Discern]

Outside of what?

Is rejecting Christ an action? Is it due to a wicked heart of unbelief?

 

[Discern]

And there is a difference?

Of course

 

[EleventhHour]

Outside of what?

Outside of the inside ...lol

As you can see I slowly devolving or evolving to my humourous side because I am not able to take the conversation seriously anymore.

 

[Discern]

Interesting take.

I didn’t make it up

 

[Discern]

Outside of the inside ...lol

As you can see I slowly devolving or evolving to my humourous side because I am not able to take the conversation seriously anymore.

Inside of what?

 

[eternally-gratefull]

Acts 17:30.

So David did not know adultry was a sin. Smh

 

[eternally-gratefull]

Adam and Eves children has to sleep with kin.

So this excuses sin
wow man your scaring me

 

[eternally-gratefull]

Agree. But if someone did convert to Islam, and you said they were never saved, that is making a judgement on that person

I said they never would
huge difference

and that’s not even close to judging a person who has an issue with one particular sin

 

[Discern]

So David did not know adultry was a sin. Smh

Not the point. The point is God allowed things then that he does not allow now. Like slavery for example

 

[Discern]

So this excuses sin
wow man your scaring me

Nope. You’re flailing at air.

Was it a sin for Cain to marry his wife?

 

[eternally-gratefull]

Lifestyle of adultery is a lifestyle.

Last line in your post is in agreement to what I have been saying

That’s one sin
that’s not a lifestyle
your in error

 

[Discern]

That’s one sin
that’s not a lifestyle
your in error

So the mafia guy that murders is one sin. Not a lifestyle unless other sins are involved? Is that what you’re saying

 

[eternally-gratefull]

Of course

Nope

you would still be judging

 

[Discern]

I said they never would
huge difference

and that’s not even close to judging a person who has an issue with one particular sin

What if they’re a really moral moslem?

 

[EleventhHour]

That’s one sin
that’s not a lifestyle
your in error

Discern is focused on sin...rather than the cross ... I find this interesting from someone who agrees with OSAS?