The Lord said the scriptures are not of private interpretation. That was not Peters interpretation. The Holy Spirit says the scriptures are not of private interpretation.
You were using similar terminology, but in a weird way. Hence my comment.
[quote[
Private interpretations are commentaries of men as the witness of men seen . God's interpretation is called sola scriptura of God not seen. The witness of God the greater.[/quote]
'Sola scriptura' is not in the Bible. The teaching of the Bible has more authority than one man's 'private interpretation' of what 'sola scriptura' means.
We are not to compare our personal interpretation as a heresy or opinion of the things not seen to His interpretation (sola scriptura) If they do not agree then we need to study to seek His approval.
If you want to complain about men creatively making up doctrine, you do not have much room to talk.
The gift of prophesying which is declaring the written will of God (the gospel) is active. It as the power of God is still casting out lying spirits called demon raises those dead in their trespasses and sin to new spirit life.
Mark 16:17And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;
Again tongues are prophecy. True tongues is simply prophecy.
In the Bible, we see shortly after disciples actually speaking in other languages. Jesus and the apostles cast out actual demonic entities, not mere metaphors.
{quote]
Adding to the perfect word sealed with 7 seven seals men use it in a false way to edify themselves as if they received confirmation from heaven and fall back called slain in the spirit to show they do not have God's approval . But in reality it is a sign against those who do not hold to what is called sola scriptura. . . (prophecy. ) Jesus said yet for all the prophecy that has been given they reject it and do whatsoever their own mouths says and see no evil in doing so. . A sign as a law against unbelieving mankind.(1 Corinthians 14:22-23)[/quote]
Have you ever played Madlibs? That paragraph looks like word salad or idea salad. We can know what prophesying means from seeing what it actually means in the Bible. We should not reinterpret it to mean some definition developed in the past few hundred years. THe Bible lists prophecy among the gifts of the Spirit given to the saints to edify the body of Christ.
No such thing as "sign gift" to confirm a person is heard on high. We walk by faith the unseen eternal. We have his witness in us not of us.
Who are you talking to? The term 'sign gifts' is a part of the elaborate set of excuses certain cessationists use for arguing that God does not do miracles or work in certain other spiritual gifts through people. The Bible demonstrates and teaches that the Spirit gives certain gifts as He wills, and some of those can be supernatural in nature. You seem to have a problem with this, that this might result in God 'confirming a person'. But the Bible does not present this as a problem. You also have no right to tell God that He may not bear witness to a person or their message.
The two words "sign" (outward, viewable confirming a person is heard on high ) and the word "gift" are not used together to make a doctrine that could come from above. We walk by faith the eternal not seen not by sight after the temporal seen.
The man who wrote the scripture that we walk by faith and not by sight did miracles and taught that the Spirit gifted members of the body of Christ to do miracles, with gifts of healing, to prophesy, etc. You are the one who has a problem with this. Paul apparently did not.
Those who do seek after a signs and wonders gospel are called rebels or a evil generation.
I have debunked your faulty reasoning in the past. The apostles asked Jesus for a sign, and He answered them. The apostles prayed for God to stretch forth His hand to heal and to do signs and wonders for the sake of Jesus.
Jesus rebuked certain people who asked Him for a sign telling them an evil and adulterous generation asks for a sign. Didn't those people eat bread and fish, too? Can I conclude that you are wicked and adulterous if you eat fish or bread? Is that logical? If a wicked and adulterous generation asks for a sign, then is anyone who asks for a sign wicked and adulterous? If you say yes, then you had better not eat bread or fish either.
Revelation is the last book sealed with seven seals and a warning not to add or substract from the perfect .
Paul's speech, knowledge, and understanding after the perfect comes will be so much more advanced than the speech knowledge and understanding he had when he wrote I Corinthians that it would be like a child's in comparison. Do you understand the mysteries of God so well that Paul's understanding was like that of a child?
The perfect spoken of in 1 Corinthians 13 had come. New prophecy (thus sayeth the lord I had a vision or dream ) which could bring new knowledge has ceased .
There are no laws missing by which we could know him more adequately.
Why do you keep repeating ideas that the apostles did not teach, then?
Private interpretations as the witness of men like Peter in John 21, who said John would remain alive till Christ returned. Jesus rebuked him and informed us that the whole world would not be able to hold the books if every time he prophesied and exposed the lies of those who would add. .
You are really confused. You need to read John again.
John 21
23 Then this saying went out among the brethren that this disciple would not die. Yet Jesus did not say to him that he would not die, but, “If I will that he remain till I come, what is that to you?”
24 This is the disciple who testifies of these things, and wrote these things; and we know that his testimony is true.
25 And there are also many other things that Jesus did, which if they were written one by one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that would be written. Amen.
(NKJV)
This is evidence that not everything Jesus, Jesus Who revealed the Father, did was recorded in scripture.
It is very clear from scripture that all prophecies (the word of God) are contained in scripture. The ones that were not written are forbidden from being added. no movement by God to add the to the last book revelation.
Your first and second sentence contradict each other. Name one person who has tried to add a true prophecy to the Bible. The restriction in Revelation is on adding to 'this scroll'. They had many scrolls with the scriptures in them, so your extrapolation is something that probably would not have made sense to the the readers.
I don't see anyone adding Micaiah's other prophecies about Ahab to the Bible, or the prophecies of the prophets in first century Corinth to scripture, or modern prophecies given in church. your argument is a red herring and a straw man, which is a stinky mess.
