Nah
One could easily do a 180 on that and say Jesus should have suffered for eternity if eternal torment was the wages of sin and Jesus took our place.
It doesn't matter the punishment, its due to Jesus' INFINITE value as the SON OF GOD, Logos of God, that Him giving His life as ransom for people is SUFFICIENT to save!
Too much for me to figure out thats for sure!What is eternity and how do you know He did not fulfill that requirement. Eternity is not time.
Too much for me to figure out thats for sure!
Thank you for answering my questionsLethal injection is used as a punishment in Texas from what I knows! It is a punishment yes.
Eternal life I consider a gift from God, but this life on this cursed earth? Not so much! I would rather not be born than have gone through all the things I have. But while I am here, I do hang on to life! Its easy to say we dont care, but for some reason God put it in us, that we will ALWAYS fight to live, no matter how bad it gets, we are just trying to survive!
Of course I believe we cant save ourselves and need Jesus to reconcile us back.
Yes I meant what was the moral of the story in the rich man and Lazarus case, what was the parable about.
Yes I can see a difference between eternal PUNISHMENT and PUNISHING.
Yup I do know that "hell" or hades in some translations is cast into the lake of fire. I can tell you why folks just call both hell, its because they look at it as the place of torment is only being "relocated" so to speak.
Who in their right mind wants to die you ask? VERY FEW! But there are some who actually commit suicide, SADLY!
I got one more question thats KIND OF related to this topic to you and @SoulWeaver and to EVERYONE really: : When Jesus says the PHARISEES will see people going to the kingdom with Jacob and Isaac and them folks and will gnash their teeth. WHEN can this happen?
Im one of them people who dont believe in soul sleep, not because im following plato or any of that nonsense. But BECAUSE, in the Book of Revelation, there are people in heaven prior to the resurrection, worshiping God, talking etc. HOW do we explain that one with the soul sleep doctrine?Those alive in Christ? Not even death separates us from Him, for in Him we live and move and have our being even in death and sleep. To call soul sleep a cultish invention is an insult to Jesus and the very Word of God. Again, not that you did![]()
I think sometimes people take things too literally... especially from such a highly symbolic apocalyptic book. Do you know that when one sleeps one is aware of the passage of time? Could those people not have been awakened to witness what was going to happen at that time? Does them being awake then necessarily mean they were awake and aware for five thousand years, or however long it had been since their body returned to the dust of the ground? Eh, a lot of assumptions have to be made to say they were aware the whole time given what Scripture says in the likening of death to sleep, in the very words of Jesus no less!Im one of them people who dont believe in soul sleep, not because im following plato or any of that nonsense. But BECAUSE, in the Book of Revelation, there are people in heaven prior to the resurrection, worshiping God, talking etc. HOW do we explain that one with the soul sleep doctrine?
Absent from the body present with the Lord does not say you are awake with Him, in fact Scripture specifically speaks of those who sleep in Him.Absent from the body present with the Lord verse is there too, but I guess that one can be explained that its still true in the soul sleep doctrine since when you are ASLEEP you cant tell TIME, so you take your last breath and BAM you wake up in a resurrected body, and it took 0,0 seconds since you had no idea what was going on.
I am making dinner right now, just home from work, I do have more to share on the issue and I appreciate your opennessBUT ANYWAY, I chose to chase that rabbit trail, how do soul sleep folks explain verses such as these:
2Co 12:3 And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth
2Co 12:4 How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter.[Third heaven says in v2, how'd he get there before the resurrection!]
Rev 6:10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
Rev 6:11 And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.
Php 1:23 For I am in a strait betwixt two, having a desire to depart, and to be with Christ; which is far better:
Act 7:59 And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.
Ecc 12:7 Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.
etc. I want to pre-emptively say too that my answer to most soulsleep proof texts is this answer: ALL OF THEM ARE TRUE, but they are talking about the BODY sleeping, us not knowing what goes on here, but the SPIRIT returns to God who gave it. Thats how I see it, thats how I was taught. Prove me wrong!
Tell me how do you see these verses if you got time that is! I'd appreciate it. Oh and I want everyone to know im writing in GOOD SPIRITS here, since we cant read tone of voice and this aint a salvation issue! I might start a separate thread on this soul sleep thing its an INTERESTING STUDY to say the least! Sorry for taking over this one @UnitedWithChrist once you stay here for a while you learn thats what I kinda do. IM A MADMAN
I think sometimes people take things too literally... especially from such a highly symbolic apocalyptic book. Do you know that when one sleeps one is aware of the passage of time? Could those people not have been awakened to witness what was going to happen at that time? Does them being awake then necessarily mean they were awake and aware for five thousand years, or however long it had been since their body returned to the dust of the ground? Eh, a lot of assumptions have to be made to say they were aware the whole time given what Scripture says in the likening of death to sleep, in the very words of Jesus no less!
Paul makes the resurrection indispensable to a future life. Without it they who are “fallen asleep in Christ as perished” (1 Cor. 15:18). “David fell on sleep” (Acts 13:36). “Some are fallen asleep” (1 Cor. 15:6). “Fallen asleep in Christ” (1 Cor. 15:18). “The first fruits of them that slept” (1 Cor. 15:20). “Concerning them which are asleep” (1 Thess. 4:13). “Our friend Lazarus sleepeth; I go that I may awake him out of his sleep” (John 11:11). “Many that sleep in the dust” (Dan. 12:2). “And when he had said this he fell asleep” (Acts 7:60). This sleep is broken by the resurrection. “I go that I may awake him out of his sleep” (John 11:11). “Awake and sing ye that dwell in dust” (Isa. 26:19). “I shall be satisfied when I awake with thy likeness” (Ps. 17:15). “Many of the bodies of the saints that slept arose” etc., etc. The Bible is full of the sleep of the dead.
Absent from the body present with the Lord does not say you are awake with Him, in fact Scripture specifically speaks of those who sleep in Him.
1 Thessalonians 4:13-14 Brothers and sisters, we do not want you to be uninformed about those who sleep in death, so that you do not grieve like the rest of mankind, who have no hope. For we believe that Jesus died and rose again, and so we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in him.
I am making dinner right now, just home from work, I do have more to share on the issue and I appreciate your opennessSo I may not be able to answer all, some points are already covered though
Soul sleep is so misunderstood, do we really need to see it as people literally sleeping? They are dead but their spirit is with God. Spirit (breath of God) + physicality = life of the soul. The spirit departs, the body rots, the soul does not really exist if we want to be completely technical about it, though spirit and soul are used somewhat interchangeably in Scripture. The main point is that Jesus referred to death as sleep more than once, and it is peppered through the OT and NT as well. Our existence continues, we in Christ are not dead but alive in Him yet in a state unlike this life, how could we possibly explain it? At the resurrection the Spirit re-unites with the body, does it not?
When a parable names someone specifically, and the parable didn’t actually happen, that parable is a lie.
Your jaded temperament towards some is quite the straw in and of itself. There’s no contradiction when discussing the differences between a parable and an actual incident involving actual people.One thing I find peculiar is how some will say, Jesus would never say anything that wasn't true! Which of course to them is proof positive that Jesus is talking about an actual event in the rich man and Lazarus story. Then they turn around and say the other parables were just stories and did not really happen. Are they are double minded? Do they not see their contradictions? Or do they simply grasp wildly at straws to try to discredit those they disagree with?
Your jaded temperament towards some is quite the straw in and of itself. There’s no contradiction when discussing the differences between a parable and an actual incident involving actual people.![]()
Same here not getting half the notifications, for the last few days. I sometimes find out later someone replied to me when I check out threads to see what people wrote afterwards.My message box is being very glitchy![]()
Exactly.....Jesus did not use some imaginary fake place that does not exist to teach truth......how they can say that he does contradicts scripture on numerous levels....that is not his Modus Operandi and is as deceptive as it comes!
Many reasons why we do not literalize the parable. One in respect to the name Lazarus that some say . Christ does use real names in parables.
The word Lazarus simply means.... God helps the poor .
So then it would seem you approve of necromancy? And Lazarus that died was able to seek the Rich mans brothers as a worker with a familiar spirit or called a patron saint, a disembodied worker as a unseen spirit and could of warned the 5 brothers? . ?
The word seek (darash: to resort to, seek). is used twice .The first seek necromancy the living to the dead as a false hope. The second seek the one manner our father in heaven .Not favorite people in heaven, the legion workers with familiar spirits or called patron saint by the Catholics.
And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead? To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.Isaiah 8:
That kind of mind set shows there is no light communication between God and mankind the curse that was on King Saul when God refused to answer . the curse a strong delusion to believe the lie, This is when Saul sought after Samuel using a false mediator a withch.
And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence .Luke 16
I think that alone shows it is a parable in a series of them all pointing to the same conclusion . The idea of sneaking in a literal interpretation just does not seem to make any sense.
I think sometimes people take things too literally... especially from such a highly symbolic apocalyptic book. Do you know that when one sleeps one is aware of the passage of time? Could those people not have been awakened to witness what was going to happen at that time? Does them being awake then necessarily mean they were awake and aware for five thousand years, or however long it had been since their body returned to the dust of the ground? Eh, a lot of assumptions have to be made to say they were aware the whole time given what Scripture says in the likening of death to sleep, in the very words of Jesus no less!
Paul makes the resurrection indispensable to a future life. Without it they who are “fallen asleep in Christ as perished” (1 Cor. 15:18). “David fell on sleep” (Acts 13:36). “Some are fallen asleep” (1 Cor. 15:6). “Fallen asleep in Christ” (1 Cor. 15:18). “The first fruits of them that slept” (1 Cor. 15:20). “Concerning them which are asleep” (1 Thess. 4:13). “Our friend Lazarus sleepeth; I go that I may awake him out of his sleep” (John 11:11). “Many that sleep in the dust” (Dan. 12:2). “And when he had said this he fell asleep” (Acts 7:60). This sleep is broken by the resurrection. “I go that I may awake him out of his sleep” (John 11:11). “Awake and sing ye that dwell in dust” (Isa. 26:19). “I shall be satisfied when I awake with thy likeness” (Ps. 17:15). “Many of the bodies of the saints that slept arose” etc., etc. The Bible is full of the sleep of the dead.
Absent from the body present with the Lord does not say you are awake with Him, in fact Scripture specifically speaks of those who sleep in Him.
1 Thessalonians 4:13-14 Brothers and sisters, we do not want you to be uninformed about those who sleep in death, so that you do not grieve like the rest of mankind, who have no hope. For we believe that Jesus died and rose again, and so we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in him.
I am making dinner right now, just home from work, I do have more to share on the issue and I appreciate your opennessSo I may not be able to answer all, some points are already covered though
Soul sleep is so misunderstood, do we really need to see it as people literally sleeping? They are dead but their spirit is with God. Spirit (breath of God) + physicality = life of the soul. The spirit departs, the body rots, the soul does not really exist if we want to be completely technical about it, though spirit and soul are used somewhat interchangeably in Scripture. The main point is that Jesus referred to death as sleep more than once, and it is peppered through the OT and NT as well. Our existence continues, we in Christ are not dead but alive in Him yet in a state unlike this life, how could we possibly explain it? At the resurrection the Spirit re-unites with the body, does it not?
Hmmm, you seemed to have left out Abraham’s name. Very interesting. And as far I as the first sentence in your second full paragraph, I approve of anything Jesus does, but I’m not suggesting that is what He did here.Many reasons why we do not literalize the parable. One in respect to the name Lazarus that some say . Christ does use real names in parables.
The word Lazarus simply means.... God helps the poor .
So then it would seem you approve of necromancy? And Lazarus that died was able to seek the Rich mans brothers as a worker with a familiar spirit or called a patron saint, a disembodied worker as a unseen spirit and could of warned the 5 brothers? . ?
The word seek (darash: to resort to, seek). is used twice .The first seek necromancy the living to the dead as a false hope. The second seek the one manner our father in heaven .Not favorite people in heaven, the legion workers with familiar spirits or called patron saint by the Catholics.
And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead? To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.Isaiah 8:
That kind of mind set shows there is no light communication between God and mankind the curse that was on King Saul when God refused to answer . the curse a strong delusion to believe the lie, This is when Saul sought after Samuel using a false mediator a withch.
And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence .Luke 16
I think that alone shows it is a parable in a series of them all pointing to the same conclusion . The idea of sneaking in a literal interpretation just does not seem to make any sense.
I think parable is a misnomer, and this is the main cause for people arguing about this. Parable would mean that this is an analogy with some hidden meaning describing something else. But this story is still about what it says it's about - what happens to people when they die. Even though it's presenting spiritual things through physical language (separation of the wicked and the righteous accurately described as unbridgeable chasm). Spiritual things are invisible, so had to be explained in physical language, but they are truly there and exist. I wouldn't exclude Lazarus having been a real person too. Why not? He could have been simultaneously a real person and a type (for the poor, in beatitudes sense) because God did it on many places in the Bible: Boaz was a real historical person yet also a type (redeemer), Moses and Elijah were real persons yet also types (the law and the prophets)… Why not Lazarus also?
Hmmm, you seemed to have left out Abraham’s name. Very interesting. And as far I as the first sentence in your second full paragraph, I approve of anything Jesus does, but I’m not suggesting that is what He did here.
Your jaded temperament towards some is quite the straw in and of itself. There’s no contradiction when discussing the differences between a parable and an actual incident involving actual people.![]()