E
eternally-gratefull
Guest
Is that your problem? The truth does not matter? So you do not care?Why look in the mirror if you don't care about what you see!?
Is that your problem? The truth does not matter? So you do not care?Why look in the mirror if you don't care about what you see!?
The penalty of sin is death, PERIODIs it true that anyone who commits sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery, idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions, and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like will not inherit the kingdom of God?
It is a sin to lie.
I asked questions, not 'fired off the darts of the evil one'
And you didn't answer any of them.
This post I quoted, that was your response, and saying that I implied the law is sin, that was your response.
The law is a mirror. It says, 'do not lie'
Why does the law say that?
It all sound well and good if what you claim I said was actually said.
Unfortunately what you're implying - The Law = Sin
argument built on a false premise is inconsequential.
Are you also EG, or GB, or Grandpa? Are you one person with many different accounts or is your Post account the only one you have? I believe the latter is the truth.
It's extremely self-centered to think that the comment includes you when you haven't been here. There has been well over a dozen posts since the post in question. If you would've taken the time to read through them you would've seen that after I ask you for clarification, EG bombarded me with post after post.
"Under the law" is a very specific idiom that means "under judgment", or "under condemnation", or "violation: sins need to be taken care of".
if i didn't have to work more than full time, and could spare more than 10 minutes once in a while to look at my phone, and if i didn't have a disabled son & a wife going through a string of surgeries to come home and see to, and you could be hospitable enough to address questions directly instead of whatever it is you call what you're doing, maybe i could keep up with all 12 pages that go by every day in the short time i can afford to check CC and see if anyone is extolling Christ in study of the scriptures.
please forgive my life.
Yes, it was really interesting! But, .... why didn't Paul go to Jerusalem right after his conversion?
If Paul were to preach the exact same Gospel the Lord preached on Earth, he would have gone to Jerusalem in order to learn about it from the eyewitnesses. But his gospel was different. Here is another proof of it:
Jesus said:
it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God
and
Sell that ye have and give alms.
Paul said:
I know what it is to be in need, and I know what it is to have plenty. I have learned the secret of being content in any and every situation, whether well fed or hungry, whether living in plenty or in want.
and (to Timothy):
Command those who are rich in this present world not to be arrogant nor to put their hope in wealth, which is so uncertain, but to put their hope in God, who richly provides us with everything for our enjoyment.
I of course would not presume to speak for others so I'll answer for myself and what I believe. Yes, it is my understanding that Revelation, hence the name, was the revelations God gave unto John during his exile on Patmos.Greetings W,
I think your question is part of the essence of the original post. And the answer to that question has been a definitive NO, Jesus did not say not to keep the commandments.
An interesting point I have put forward and received no answer on is this; If the book of Revelation was John putting down the words of Yahshua then how, if the book was written long after the last epistle of Paul was written can they reconcile these verses;
Rev_12:17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
Rev_14:12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.
Rev_22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
Crickets!
I have asked a few of them if they acknowledge Revelation as truly the words of Yahshua and only one out of many has said yes, the rest refuse to answer.
Also, many people forget the other portion of that commandment. "Six days thou shalt do thy work,...."
Bless YHWH, Know and Keep
SG
if i didn't have to work more than full time, and could spare more than 10 minutes once in a while to look at my phone, and if i didn't have a disabled son & a wife going through a string of surgeries to come home and see to, and you could be hospitable enough to address questions directly instead of whatever it is you call what you're doing, maybe i could keep up with all 12 pages that go by every day in the short time i can afford to check CC and see if anyone is extolling Christ in study of the scriptures.
please forgive my life.
are you sure the apostle is trying to say 'to those under violation, condemnation and judgement i became as one under violation, condemnation and judgement' ?
are you certain what is meant here is 'y'all who desire to be under violation, condemnation and judgement, do you not hear what the condemnation says?' ?
let's examine that. vv. 22-31 says Hagar and Sarah are two covenants ((hello?? allegory? what is Mssr. MacArthur thinking??)) - and that the slave woman, Hagar, is Mt. Sinai -- cast out the bondwoman then, because we have become children of the free. now, remember, vv. 22-31 is explaining v.21 ((you said 'context' remember?)). so Hagar represents 'the law' - a specific law, because scripture mentions more than one.
so which law is Jeremiah writing of in ch. 31 of his book?
the condemnation, violation, judgement law?
Galatians 4:21 doesn't make any differentiation between the law of 'under the law' and 'the law'
and the people the epistle is written to are trying, perhaps unwittingly ((?)) to put themselves under the auspices of a very specific 'the law' -- Mt. Sinai. Torah. Moses' law. the covenant made a Horeb. the first 5 books.
i don't have any more time for you. think about my questions, please. not about judgement of others; about the questions, and about Christ, who He is and what He does.
I of course would not presume to speak for others so I'll answer for myself and what I believe. Yes, it is my understanding that Revelation, hence the name, was the revelations God gave unto John during his exile on Patmos.
I think if I hold faith in the wisdom and good news of Jesus the Christ, that I should believe what he instructed in his word. And that scripture in Revelation would for me settle the matter of commandments and sabbath.
I think the conflict would arise if I would try to out think the words of God. And put my own spin on it were I to prefer my version to that which is eternally his.
I think it a great addition to our discussion that you added the passages from the Book of Revelation. God's work that is.Thank you. And blessings to you.
This is wisdom and knowledge and a gift and I thank you.They are trying to put themselves under the purification rituals for justification (i.e. cleansing). Those are the works in context. Paul makes his point clear that one can't justify themselves, but then says "if while we seek to be justified by faith in Christ we find ourselves in sin (i.e. breaking the law) is Christ a minister of sin (i.e. is Christ a priest of the sinful or does Christ lead one to sin)? God forbid! If I build back up what has been torn dow (i.e. a sinful life in context) I prove myself to be a lawbreaker."
Can't get much stronger than "God forbid".
One can not break the law while seeking to be justified by Christ. Ergo to not break the law one must obey it.
For example, "Thou shall not commit adultery." This law when followed doesn't clean one of their sin. Must it be followed? Absolutely, but it doesn't clean sins.
There's nothing about this adultery law that even pretends to be a ritual for cleasing sins or purification. It's not a work of the law for justification. It's not an example of cleansing. It's not a schoolmaster that leads to Christ.
...but the law to bring a lamb to the temple IS a ritual for cleansing sins; IS a "schoolmaster" pointing DIRECTLY to Christ and his work, like a laser pointer.
Another example. The law not to bear false witness is a law that can not be broken because to do so is to sin. But this law isn't for cleansing or purification.
Meanwhile, the law to bring two goats for the atonement of the nation IS a law for cleansing, which directs the focus squarely on the work Christ would do as high priest. Such is a work of the law for cleansing of sins.
That's the context.
Don't suppose you have that for the entire NT???This is what the record in Acts details regarding Paul and the law.
My guess is that in the 3 years he spent in Arabia, the ascended Christ revealed the Gospel of Grace message to him. ......................
............................You may find this short ebook interesting to understand more about the comparison between Paul and Moses http://shopeshop.org/Searchable Riches!/Authors/Stam, CR/Moses and Paul.pdf
Posthuman asked what law was written on your heart.By faith I received the gift of salvation. By faith you received the gift of salvation. Jesus died for my sins. Jesus died for your sins. The laws of love are written on my heart. The laws of love are written on your. The laws of the kingdom of God in which rests the laws and the prophets are written in my mind. The laws are written in yours. The spirit dwells within me. The spirit dwells within you. The spirit leads and guides me in all aspects of my life and convicts me when my flesh causes me to sin. The yoke of the Lord is light. The spirit leads and guides you and and leads you in all aspects of your life, you have no yoke.
I acknowledge there are laws written within me. You do not acknowledge the laws written within you. I believe commandments can be broke. You do not believe there are any commandments left to follow. This covers me - whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. This covers you - whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven. Because I acknowledge my sin I repent and ask forgiveness as instructed by Jesus in how to pray to the Father - Give us this day our daily bread and forgive us, I do this daily and by the spirit within me I produce fruits of it. Because you repented when baptized and all your sins forgiven and now have no law, you have no sin, you do not repent. you are not forgiven daily and the spirit produces your fruit while you rest. I believe Jesus became the Sabbath and I rest in Him everyday. You believe the Sabbath went away. I am is smart.
These are the lessons I have learned from each side of the teaching. Please if I have misrepresented anything let me know.