Irrelevant. They weren’t merely reading already-existing Scripture. That’s what Garee is implying that they were doing.Did any of them have a completed canon of scripture?
Yeah, I did not think so God was still giving his word.
Irrelevant. They weren’t merely reading already-existing Scripture. That’s what Garee is implying that they were doing.Did any of them have a completed canon of scripture?
Yeah, I did not think so God was still giving his word.
Ephesians (like all the other epistles) is written to the Spirit-filled church where ALL the members were baptised in waterEphesians 2 lays out a clear explanation of the Holy Spirit and the conversion of the soul.
Irrelevant. They weren’t merely reading already-existing Scripture. That’s what Garee is implying that they were doing.
While your contention is wholly without merit it simply does not change the meaning and intent of the scriptures is Ephesians 2.Ephesians (like all the other epistles) is written to the Spirit-filled church where ALL the members were baptised in water
and also baptised in the Holy Spirit with the God given sign of speaking in a new tongue ...
Ephesians (like all the other epistles) is written to the Spirit-filled church where ALL the members were baptised in water
and also baptised in the Holy Spirit with the God given sign of speaking in a new tongue ...
While your contention is wholly without merit it simply does not change the meaning and intent of the scriptures is Ephesians 2.
It is the Holy Spirit that makes alive the soul that is dead in trespass and sin. Ephesians 2:1 You are a lost soul until the moment the Holy Spirit makes you alive in Christ by grace through faith.
Water baptism has nothing to do with the new birth in Christ unto eternal life. Tongues have nothing to do with the conversion of the soul.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
I'm hoping you will see this answer as a clarification and NOT as an attempt to make you look bad.Yeah it does
You seemed to contradict yourself. Thats a prety big conundrum
You missed my point altogether.I'm hoping you will see this answer as a clarification and NOT as an attempt to make you look bad.
One of the reason most churches are woefully unprepared is because they read the word and make incorrect ASSUMPTIONS as to what it said/says.
And we're all capable of doing it. I will go so far as to say that the reason you see a conundrum is because you'd already made an incorrect assumption concerning the few words that I'd said. I'll point it out and clarify the importance in my next post, hopefully. But meanwhile, reread my original post and compare it to what you said in your first reply to see if you can spot the assumption.
I'll give you a hint. The wrong assumption is in your sentence starting with "But churches".
Love in Jesus,
Kelby
I do not read the stuff he posts.. Has some odd ideas, forgive me for misunderstanding
But my point was that if they had known the scripture. There would be no need for prophesy, Because they could just use scripture.
It's okay to be odd (different than what is common). However, it seems that you are using that as an excuse for holding odd (aberrant) ideas. Your explanation above is clearly rooted in the Bible, in that you make reference to several Bible verses. However, you've mixed up the ideas, misquoted verses, and ended up with something that is not biblical.Sorry, forgive me I was born odd colorful just ask my wife.
Well I would thnk because we defend the same spirit faith as it is written it would be your homework to see if what I am offering is true to the word. Personally your idea seems odd to be.
Do we look to the things seen to give a faith to believe God not seen or do we look to the things seen. Can't serve two teaching masters. Jesus said only God not seen is the one good teaching master.
I think you forgot prophecy is scripture. (not a private interpretation) When prophets as believers prophesy we declare scripture ,(the word of God) as the seed of Chjist. . Can't divide scripture from scripture.
We should be careful how we hear. We are made aware of the wile of the devil that call that divided that God calls altogether as one.
How could the deaf hear the words of scripture found in the book prophecy unless a prophet declares it. How beautiful are the feet that bring the good news of prophecy, scripture, as it is written .
A parable of our salvation.
Isaiah 29:18And in that day shall the deaf hear the words of the book, and the eyes of the blind shall see out of obscurity, and out of darkness.
And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.Revelation 22:19-21
You just love being wrong -Water baptism has nothing to do with the new birth in Christ unto eternal life. Tongues have nothing to do with the conversion of the soul.
You just love being wrong -
Scriptures concerning everyone's need to repent, be water baptized and receive the infilling of the Holy Ghost are there for all to see. Paul's epistles were written to those who followed the above command. Paul was still stating the need for obedience to such 25 years after Pentecost. (Acts 19:1-6)While your contention is wholly without merit it simply does not change the meaning and intent of the scriptures is Ephesians 2.
It is the Holy Spirit that makes alive the soul that is dead in trespass and sin. Ephesians 2:1 You are a lost soul until the moment the Holy Spirit makes you alive in Christ by grace through faith.
Water baptism has nothing to do with the new birth in Christ unto eternal life. Tongues have nothing to do with the conversion of the soul.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Wrong gospel? Funny that believing in the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus and being obedient to the instructions given to the NT church are seen as going against the word.Thats an insult.
But it does not matter, Its the truth.
Tongues and other topics are non salvic. One can get it wrong and still be saved.
But if you have the wrong, gospel. Well. There is only one place to go. It has eternal consequences.
Believing/trusting in the death, burial and resurrection of Christ as the ALL-sufficient means of our salvation is to believe the gospel. (Romans 1:16; 1 Corinthians 15:1-4)Wrong gospel? Funny that believing in the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus and being obedient to the instructions given to the NT church are seen as going against the word.
Take heed because both Peter and Paul stated that not all obey(ed) the gospel. (1 Peter 4:17; Rom. 10:16) Thus how is one obedient to the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus? The bible clearly instructs all to repent, be water baptized and receive the infilling of the Holy Ghost. That evidence is clearly seen in the word. Paul obeyed the command and his epistles were written to those who obeyed as well. Paul was still stating the need for obedience 25 years after Pentecost. (Acts 19:1-6)
Great is the error in your doctrine. Water baptism does not save and tongues do not save.You just love being wrong -
Scripture teaches that we are saved by grace. Grace alone converts us from children of hell to children of God.Scriptures concerning everyone's need to repent, be water baptized and receive the infilling of the Holy Ghost are there for all to see. Paul's epistles were written to those who followed the above command. Paul was still stating the need for obedience to such 25 years after Pentecost. (Acts 19:1-6)
I believe in the gospel that all of them taughtWrong gospel? Funny that believing in the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus and being obedient to the instructions given to the NT church are seen as going against the word.
Take heed because both Peter and Paul stated that not all obey(ed) the gospel. (1 Peter 4:17; Rom. 10:16) Thus how is one obedient to the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus? The bible clearly instructs all to repent, be water baptized and receive the infilling of the Holy Ghost. That evidence is clearly seen in the word. Paul obeyed the command and his epistles were written to those who obeyed as well. Paul was still stating the need for obedience 25 years after Pentecost. (Acts 19:1-6)