For verse 30'in KJV it says 'I and my Father are one. '
Note 'my'. Not 'the'.
You are correct to say "my" so that Jesus and his Father are one. Amen!
God bless...
For verse 30'in KJV it says 'I and my Father are one. '
Note 'my'. Not 'the'.
ROFL
You have a messed up version of history. The creeds were created to define what a Christian must believe. Anything outside of it is to agree to disagree. Anything contrary to it is heresy!! As being what a Christian must believe they were used to evangelize people. Keep in mind that Bibles were very expensive and rare. Hand copied by scribes. Too many people like you ignore that this was the case before the printing press. Creeds were easily memorized. Thus a standard of Christian belief easily used to proclaim the gospel!
For verse 30'in KJV it says 'I and my Father are one. '
Note 'my'. Not 'the'.
JEsus also said blessed are those who have not seen yet believed which is part of the verse you havent quoted.
Please tell us where in the creeds there is anything contrary to the Bible. The early elders wrote them to define what a Christian must believe. Refute that if they are wrong!!The scriptures define the gospel. As it teaches us we abide in him . Not Creed writers
You have a messed up the one source of Christian faith as it is written . Anything outside of it is to disagree with God.
Not as it is written in creeds according to your law .
The bible was created to define what a Christians must believe. Not the private interpretation of men as their own personal bias or creed . Creeds are not laws .They are personal opinions .
Thomas said to Him, “My Lord and my God!”Then Jesus told him, “Because you have seen Me, you have believed"(John 20:28-29)it isn't actually written that Thomas put his fingers in His hand or His side - but it is written, that Thomas saw, that Thomas called Him God, and that Thomas believed.
when Thomas calls Him his Lord and his God, Jesus calls this, belief.
That Jesusbelieve what?
believe what Thomas believes, in the context. this is what Thomas believes: that the risen one who stood in front of him is his Lord and God. Thomas saw Him, and Thomas believed. he is not an example of unbelief but belief, and we are blessed, because we have not seen, but even so, we believe.
believe what?
oop sorry reply twice, well if you read further on the chapter, verse 31believe what?
believe what Thomas believes, in the context. this is what Thomas believes: that the risen one who stood in front of him is his Lord and God. Thomas saw Him, and Thomas believed. he is not an example of unbelief but belief, and we are blessed, because we have not seen, but even so, we believe.
believe what?
Huh interesting so what does it say for verse 29 cos both times 'My' isnt in italics there.note that in KJV 'my' is italicized: indicating that it is not in the actual text.
this is John 10:30 in Greek --
ἐγὼ καὶ ὁ πατὴρ ἕν ἐσμεν
ἐγὼ = I
καὶ = and
ὁ = the
πατὴρ = Father
ἕν = one
ἐσμεν = are
this is the greek word for 'my'
μου
That Jesus
oop sorry reply twice, well if you read further on the chapter, verse 31
But these are written that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the son of God;and that believing ye might have life in his name.
Does your bible not have that explanation?
I am not trying to argue with you but just comparing scripture its kinda hard to follow your posts if you have a different bible version to me.
That Jesus
oop sorry reply twice, well if you read further on the chapter, verse 31
But these are written that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the son of God;and that believing ye might have life in his name.
Does your bible not have that explanation?
Huh interesting so what does it say for verse 29 cos both times 'My' isnt in italics there.
It would seem to demonstrate where the power to believe comes from Jesus as the Son of God. And not reckoned after Jesus as the Son of man, the temporal what the eyes see. He said His flesh profits for nothing.
The flesh as the Son of man according to his corrupted flesh has no power to save
Romans 1:4 And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:
No power after the birth.
Verily, verily I say unto you, the hour shall come, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear it shall live.For as the Father hath life in himself, so likewise hath He given to the Son to have life in Himself.And hath given Him power also to execute judgment, in that He is the Son of man.Marvel not at this: for the hour shall come, in the which all that are in the graves, shall hear His voice.(John 5:25-28, 1599 GNV)the voice of the Son of God quickens, and the voice of the Son of man judges, and He is One, as God is One.
The LORD killeth and maketh alive: bringeth down to the grave and raiseth up.(1 Samuel 2:6, 1599 GNV)the voice of the Son is the voice of the LORD
the word of the Son is the word of God; the Son is the Word, and the Words is with God, and the Word is God
The correct term would be "subjection to God the Father" (for both the Son and the Spirit). Not mutual submission.Two or three working togehther in perfect harmony and mutual submission to each other .. .. .. never one alone.
The correct term would be "subjection to God the Father" (for both the Son and the Spirit). Not mutual submission.
The same applies within a marriage. Just as the Head of Christ is God (the Father), and as Christ is the Head of the man, the man is the head of the woman (1 Cor 11:3). Not mutual submission as some falsely teach.
]Hi Thanks for the reply
I am not sure if its false .It seems to be what Isaiah 53 the( gospel) is saying . The father striking the Son with the letter of the law the Son of man Jesus losing strength crying out to the father ..the father in mutual submission send a messenger to help him finish the labor of their love. It takes two to establish a government of perfect peace .One that surely does surpass human understanding
ROFLlet's learn to read Greek![]()