Why Christians get a bad rap amongst the Jews...(an example)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

yellowcanary

Junior Member
May 22, 2018
122
78
28
Should we pray for the peace of Jerusalem before ... or after it has conquered all those in possession of it's land ? Hmmmm ... what to do ? :unsure:
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Well lets see if any of those who try to spiritualze this all away can start at ad70 and work their way backward and say the prophecies meant the Greeks didn't literately rule or that Nebuchadnezzar didnt acctually come and put bonds on them and lead them literally into captivity. I bet they cant find a thing they will try to spiritualize away,lol...
It is problematic to state "spiritualize away"

If one negates or denies the spiritual it is just as wrong as negating or denying the temporal.

The key is rightly dividing between the two in scripture.

Metaphor is can be both/either spiritual or concrete in its intent
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Should we pray for the peace of Jerusalem before ... or after it has conquered all those in possession of it's land ? Hmmmm ... what to do ? :unsure:
Yes should we indeed?....this is the plan and why we need to pray.....

First we have a counterfeit temple which will be destroyed along with untold lives, then we will have the fourth Temple from which Jesus will reign along with the institution of the animal sacrifices once again.
(Walwoord eschatology)
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
It is problematic to state "spiritualize away"

If one negates or denies the spiritual it is just as wrong as negating or denying the temporal.

The key is rightly dividing between the two in scripture.

Metaphor is can be both/either spiritual or concrete in its intent

lol, OK start at ad66-70 at the Jewish revolt and go backward through the Bible and say the things that were spiritually fulfilled instead of literal.

Were the events of ad66-70 literal or spiritual whats Gods MO?
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
lol, OK start at ad66-70 at the Jewish revolt and go backward through the Bible and say the things that were spiritually fulfilled instead of literal.

Were the events of ad66-70 literal or spiritual whats Gods MO?
Mr. iamsosandso, me thinks you missed my point

I did not state "instead of" the point is to discern and rightly divide the word of God in a consistent way

I will state that Thess 4 "rapture theory" is an over literal/concrete reading of the passage, much like Paul's statement "If I speak in the tongues of men or of angels" is an over literal reading of the statement, a statement which is obviously stated in the superlative and a metaphor.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
This seems contradictory to me?
Why?

Prophesy is a foretelling of future events

Symbology is a figure whihc represents spiritual truths.

Jesus did not spiritually come to earth and spiritually die, so we can all be made clean by just believing and wishing on his symbolic death,

He literally died, The symbols were the OT sacrifices and temple, which should have led Israel, (and us) to christ.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Well lets see if any of those who try to spiritualze this all away can start at ad70 and work their way backward and say the prophecies meant the Greeks didn't literately rule or that Nebuchadnezzar didnt acctually come and put bonds on them and lead them literally into captivity. I bet they cant find a thing they will try to spiritualize away,lol...
Thats is one of the arguments to support futurism.

Using the past interpretatio of prophesy (literally fulfilled) to determine how the rst of prophesy shoudl be fulfilled

If the past was literal. Not symbolic. The future should follow suit.

if the past was symbolic, then the future should follow suit.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Should we pray for the peace of Jerusalem before ... or after it has conquered all those in possession of it's land ? Hmmmm ... what to do ? :unsure:
We should pray for all people. No matter who they are.

Nothing wrong with praying for peace anywhere, as long as you pray for it for everyone.


Then again, if your not praying for peace. Then you have issues which must be dealt with.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
Should we pray for the peace of Jerusalem before ... or after it has conquered all those in possession of it's land ? Hmmmm ... what to do ? :unsure:
Praying for it's peace is essentially praying for the Lord's return as their will be no peace until the Prince of Peace reigns over all the earth from His Throne.

Psalm 122:5-6 KJV
[5] For there are set thrones of judgment, the thrones of the house of David. [6] Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee.

1 Corinthians 16:22 KJV
[22] If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maranatha.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
It is problematic to state "spiritualize away"

If one negates or denies the spiritual it is just as wrong as negating or denying the temporal.

The key is rightly dividing between the two in scripture.

Metaphor is can be both/either spiritual or concrete in its intent
Thats just it

Interpret prophesy as it should be interpreted (literal)

Interpret metaphor or parable or symbolic the way it should be interpreted.

But dont mix the too. Thats where you run into problems. (Yes I have seen some people try to interpet parables literally and play out the parables thinking it is from God.. )
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
Mr. iamsosandso, me thinks you missed my point

I did not state "instead of" the point is to discern and rightly divide the word of God in a consistent way

I will state that Thess 4 "rapture theory" is an over literal/concrete reading of the passage, much like Paul's statement "If I speak in the tongues of men or of angels" is an over literal reading of the statement, a statement which is obviously stated in the superlative and a metaphor.

But the issue of God saying he will do something and then it literally, actually taking place from Genesis 1:1 up to ad70 you see as literally happening right? Things like the frogs and locust, waters turning to blood ect. and the first born in Egypt actually being dead the next morning except for those who had the blood of the Lamb on their doorpost you see as literal right?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Yes should we indeed?....this is the plan and why we need to pray.....

First we have a counterfeit temple which will be destroyed along with untold lives, then we will have the fourth Temple from which Jesus will reign along with the institution of the animal sacrifices once again.
(Walwoord eschatology)
Whats that have to do with praying for a nation?
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
Thats is one of the arguments to support futurism.

Using the past interpretatio of prophesy (literally fulfilled) to determine how the rst of prophesy shoudl be fulfilled

If the past was literal. Not symbolic. The future should follow suit.

if the past was symbolic, then the future should follow suit.

I agree,,,I notice that those who argue spiritual fulfillment's only do so from ad70 onward in time but when speaking of the things from ad70 backward always see them being fulfilled litterally. If God from the begginning said he would do somthing and always litterally fulfilled it then after thousands of years of him doing so it is to convey that he does this in that manner.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
I agree,,,I notice that those who argue spiritual fulfillment's only do so from ad70 onward in time but when speaking of the things from ad70 backward always see them being fulfilled litterally. If God from the begginning said he would do somthing and always litterally fulfilled it then after thousands of years of him doing so it is to convey that he does this in that manner.
Not necessarily, there are those that spiritualize the Millennium, saying it began at the cross and ends at His 2nd Coming with no 70AD mentioned.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I agree,,,I notice that those who argue spiritual fulfillment's only do so from ad70 onward in time but when speaking of the things from ad70 backward always see them being fulfilled litterally. If God from the begginning said he would do somthing and always litterally fulfilled it then after thousands of years of him doing so it is to convey that he does this in that manner.
One of the best examples would be daniel 9, Or the passage where jesus read up to a point, and said today that is fulfilled (the stuff after would be fulfilled at a later time)

But it is hard to get people to see those things.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
Thats just it

Interpret prophesy as it should be interpreted (literal)

Interpret metaphor or parable or symbolic the way it should be interpreted.

But dont mix the too. Thats where you run into problems. (Yes I have seen some people try to interpet parables literally and play out the parables thinking it is from God.. )
Just a question......concerning the parable of the wheat and tares.....did not JESUS go on to explain the parable and the elements of the parable did indeed represent actual physical events, people, angels etc.....??

Reapers --ANGELS
Wheat --Children of the Kingdom
Tares---Children of the devil
Harvest ---The end of the world
etc....


Based upon the above, I would have to disagree with the hard fast rule that parables cannot be interpreted literally
 

yellowcanary

Junior Member
May 22, 2018
122
78
28
Yes should we indeed?....this is the plan and why we need to pray.....

First we have a counterfeit temple which will be destroyed along with untold lives, then we will have the fourth Temple from which Jesus will reign along with the institution of the animal sacrifices once again.
(Walwoord eschatology)
Animal sacrifices will never be seen again in Christ's kingdom ... nor should they be. Jesus Christ set aside the first (OT animal sacrifices for sins) to establish the second (His perfect once and for all sacrifice of Himself).

Hebrews 10

Christ’s Sacrifice Once for All

10 The law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming—not the realities themselves. For this reason it can never, by the same sacrifices repeated endlessly year after year, make perfect those who draw near to worship. 2 Otherwise, would they not have stopped being offered? For the worshipers would have been cleansed once for all, and would no longer have felt guilty for their sins. 3 But those sacrifices are an annual reminder of sins. 4 It is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.

5 Therefore, when Christ came into the world, he said:

“Sacrifice and offering you did not desire,
but a body you prepared for me;
6 with burnt offerings and sin offerings
you were not pleased.

7 Then I said, ‘Here I am—it is written about me in the scroll—
I have come to do your will, my God.’”
8 First he said, “Sacrifices and offerings, burnt offerings and sin offerings you did not desire, nor were you pleased with them”—though they were offered in accordance with the law. 9 Then he said, “Here I am, I have come to do your will.He sets aside the first to establish the second. 10 And by that will, we have been made holy through the sacrifice of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

11 Day after day every priest stands and performs his religious duties; again and again he offers the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. 12 But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God, 13 and since that time he waits for his enemies to be made his footstool. 14 For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Just a question......concerning the parable of the wheat and tares.....did not JESUS go on to explain the parable and the elements of the parable did indeed represent actual physical events, people, angels etc.....??

Reapers --ANGELS
Wheat --Children of the Kingdom
Tares---Children of the devil
Harvest ---The end of the world
etc....


Based upon the above, I would have to disagree with the hard fast rule that parables cannot be interpreted literally
The parable explained spiritual truths not about these people

The truth is the Wheat and tares must grow together. And they will until the end, when God seperates the two. One to be burned, the other to have eternal life.

It was not so much about the people