Should we pray for the peace of Jerusalem before ... or after it has conquered all those in possession of it's land ? Hmmmm ... what to do ? 
Well lets see if any of those who try to spiritualze this all away can start at ad70 and work their way backward and say the prophecies meant the Greeks didn't literately rule or that Nebuchadnezzar didnt acctually come and put bonds on them and lead them literally into captivity. I bet they cant find a thing they will try to spiritualize away,lol...
Should we pray for the peace of Jerusalem before ... or after it has conquered all those in possession of it's land ? Hmmmm ... what to do ?![]()
It is problematic to state "spiritualize away"
If one negates or denies the spiritual it is just as wrong as negating or denying the temporal.
The key is rightly dividing between the two in scripture.
Metaphor is can be both/either spiritual or concrete in its intent
lol, OK start at ad66-70 at the Jewish revolt and go backward through the Bible and say the things that were spiritually fulfilled instead of literal.
Were the events of ad66-70 literal or spiritual whats Gods MO?
Why?This seems contradictory to me?
Thats is one of the arguments to support futurism.Well lets see if any of those who try to spiritualze this all away can start at ad70 and work their way backward and say the prophecies meant the Greeks didn't literately rule or that Nebuchadnezzar didnt acctually come and put bonds on them and lead them literally into captivity. I bet they cant find a thing they will try to spiritualize away,lol...
We should pray for all people. No matter who they are.Should we pray for the peace of Jerusalem before ... or after it has conquered all those in possession of it's land ? Hmmmm ... what to do ?![]()
Praying for it's peace is essentially praying for the Lord's return as their will be no peace until the Prince of Peace reigns over all the earth from His Throne.Should we pray for the peace of Jerusalem before ... or after it has conquered all those in possession of it's land ? Hmmmm ... what to do ?![]()
It is problematic to state "spiritualize away"
If one negates or denies the spiritual it is just as wrong as negating or denying the temporal.
The key is rightly dividing between the two in scripture.
Metaphor is can be both/either spiritual or concrete in its intent
Mr. iamsosandso, me thinks you missed my point
I did not state "instead of" the point is to discern and rightly divide the word of God in a consistent way
I will state that Thess 4 "rapture theory" is an over literal/concrete reading of the passage, much like Paul's statement "If I speak in the tongues of men or of angels" is an over literal reading of the statement, a statement which is obviously stated in the superlative and a metaphor.
Whats that have to do with praying for a nation?Yes should we indeed?....this is the plan and why we need to pray.....
First we have a counterfeit temple which will be destroyed along with untold lives, then we will have the fourth Temple from which Jesus will reign along with the institution of the animal sacrifices once again.
(Walwoord eschatology)
Thats is one of the arguments to support futurism.
Using the past interpretatio of prophesy (literally fulfilled) to determine how the rst of prophesy shoudl be fulfilled
If the past was literal. Not symbolic. The future should follow suit.
if the past was symbolic, then the future should follow suit.
Not necessarily, there are those that spiritualize the Millennium, saying it began at the cross and ends at His 2nd Coming with no 70AD mentioned.I agree,,,I notice that those who argue spiritual fulfillment's only do so from ad70 onward in time but when speaking of the things from ad70 backward always see them being fulfilled litterally. If God from the begginning said he would do somthing and always litterally fulfilled it then after thousands of years of him doing so it is to convey that he does this in that manner.
One of the best examples would be daniel 9, Or the passage where jesus read up to a point, and said today that is fulfilled (the stuff after would be fulfilled at a later time)I agree,,,I notice that those who argue spiritual fulfillment's only do so from ad70 onward in time but when speaking of the things from ad70 backward always see them being fulfilled litterally. If God from the begginning said he would do somthing and always litterally fulfilled it then after thousands of years of him doing so it is to convey that he does this in that manner.
Thats just it
Interpret prophesy as it should be interpreted (literal)
Interpret metaphor or parable or symbolic the way it should be interpreted.
But dont mix the too. Thats where you run into problems. (Yes I have seen some people try to interpet parables literally and play out the parables thinking it is from God.. )
Whew, good thing for the Holy Spirit.But it is hard to get people to see those things.
Yes should we indeed?....this is the plan and why we need to pray.....
First we have a counterfeit temple which will be destroyed along with untold lives, then we will have the fourth Temple from which Jesus will reign along with the institution of the animal sacrifices once again.
(Walwoord eschatology)
The parable explained spiritual truths not about these peopleJust a question......concerning the parable of the wheat and tares.....did not JESUS go on to explain the parable and the elements of the parable did indeed represent actual physical events, people, angels etc.....??
Reapers --ANGELS
Wheat --Children of the Kingdom
Tares---Children of the devil
Harvest ---The end of the world
etc....
Based upon the above, I would have to disagree with the hard fast rule that parables cannot be interpreted literally
Problem is, we all thinks we learn from the spirit. No matter what we believeWhew, good thing for the Holy Spirit.