OK Budman, have it your way!
Danke schön.
OK Budman, have it your way!
It's not unloving to be intolerant of aberrant beliefs.
And as far as the mocking goes...well, Elijah is a hero of mine:
"And at noon Elijah mocked them, saying, “Cry aloud, for he is a god. Either he is musing, or he is relieving himself, or he is on a journey, or perhaps he is asleep and must be awakened.” (1 Kings 18:27)
![]()
You know.........a big picture of grace, mercy, Christ taking our place when we are guilty and being forgiven is found in the account of David when he committed adultery and murder........
a. Under the law David was guilty and condemned
b. Under the law David should have been put to death
c. David, when approached by Nathan and told the story said the man should die that had done this
d. David, as evidenced by the Psalms, was convicted of his sin to the core
e. David was told by Nathan, you are that man and GOD HAS PUT AWAY YOUR SIN <--PREEMPTIVELY
f. David was spared and the INNOCENT SON of DAVID took his place in DEATH and paid the price
g. David as a SON of GOD was CHASTENED for his sin, but NOT cast away or LOST his salvation which is spoken of in the present TENSE
HAVE mercy on me thou SON of DAVID <-----THE man yells to JESUS as he walks by..............
It is evident by the comment you are responding to that they are only trying to rile you up and provoke you.You just admitted you're a troll.
How do you like my sig.
It is evident by the comment you are responding to that they are only trying to rile you up and provoke you.
Its best to stop engaging once the discussion hits a low-point like that. Its no longer about the issue but just sophistry and provocation.
If it doesnt influence the salvation at all, hey, why not? You're only gonna lose some rewards
When its all said and done, the modern version of OSAS is predicted in the Bible and is unheard of in Church history, they could not even fathom such an idea.
A Christian named Irenaeus lived during the 2nd century A.D. (130-202). He wrote a book titled, “Against Heresies” in which he called attention to this particular fact. In this work (Book I Chapter 6) he said the following regarding Gnostic teaching:
But as to themselves, they hold that they shall be entirely and undoubtedly saved, not by means of conduct, but because they are spiritual by nature. For, just as it is impossible that material substance should partake of salvation (since, indeed, they maintain that it is incapable of receiving it), so again it is impossible that spiritual substance (by which they mean themselves) should ever come under the power of corruption, whatever the sort of actions in which they indulged. For even as gold, when submersed in filth, loses not on that account its beauty, but retains its own native qualities, the filth having no power to injure the gold, so they affirm that they cannot in any measure suffer hurt, or lose their spiritual substance, whatever the material actions in which they may be involved.
Wherefore also it comes to pass, that the “most perfect” among them addict themselves without fear to all those kinds of forbidden deeds of which the Scriptures assure us that “they who do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.”
And committing many other abominations and impieties, they run us down (who from the fear of God guard against sinning even in thought or word) as utterly contemptible and ignorant persons, while they highly exalt themselves, and claim to be perfect, and the elect seed. SOURCE
Compare this to what you hear from many of the pulpits today. Its like Peter predicted, Paul's writings wrested and twisted. Who would be the one bringing in false security and encouraging people to not repent by telling them they are okay if they believe in Jesus, positionally righteous while getting drunk regularly? Look at the fruits of easy believism that we have today, cant tell the difference between professing christians and the world.
Not in here for a debate, truth has already set me free. Once the Son sets you free you shall be free indeed. Just here to post my view, as many from the opposing side have also. -> I got no problem with any OSAS-believers, if they are in the faith, they are my brothers and sisters, no matter what theology they believe. <-
Yeah. And I like that part where he said; "I said I would stay away if no one mentioned me."
As if he's some great theological force to be feared.![]()
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you are saying here but I have to disagree.Those who know their sin, cannot truly face God, because if they did they do not know
quite what they would do, because their faith denies resolution is truly possible.
They lie more than atheists I talk to online And are much more rude too
It's a shame when atheists are more civil and honest then Christians
Look at the lie DC told recorded in my sig.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you are saying here but I have to disagree.
Is it not possible that those who know their son cannot face God because they do not know what God would do?
By this I mean they are waiting for "You have sinned once to many and so now your out, no more forgiveness is available to you"
FHS, there are belivers like that. They fear that God will reject them.
It's not that they do not want resolution, they want it alright.
But they can be stuck in the resolution of "I'm a dirty sinner, I obviously do not love God and as a result God cannot love me"
Is that the truth or is it a lie?
We know the answer but the person who has been fed the lie eventually will belive it's the truth.
So I disagree with your first premise.
With regards to your last comment one needs to indentify what that resolution is and that is based on what they truly believe what God thinks about them.
What I find interesting about you is that you come across as someone who does not struggle with what you have posted above, yet you make such a statement about others.
If so why so?
To be perfectly honest to tell someone to stop sinning, or stop a sin pattern is not the answer. If they could then they would not seek help.
Dealing with cause of the affect is what is needed.
I am male....... Fran is a woman's name. You got the wrong one.Looks like Fran is back again......nice try...no cigar....the bible does teach eternal security regardless of those that think and or believe in their minds they actually help JESUS do what he said he would do.....
I am male....... Fran is a woman's name. You got the wrong one
Can you point me to who I have similar verbiage? Dont care for your paranoid detective work. I have not been banned and "can back this time" which you seem to be suggesting.Cool.....so.....who were you before you can back this time??? Same verbiage, mannerisms and even words......seems very very suspect
I am male....... Fran is a woman's name. You got the wrong one.
I disagree and reject your premise that we are "helping" Jesus
Can you point me to who I have similar verbiage? Dont care for your paranoid detective work. I have not been banned and "can back this time" which you seem to be suggesting.
Did someone else quote that same article I did previously or what exactly is the problem?
Lol.They lie more than atheists I talk to online And are much more rude too
It's a shame when atheists are more civil and honest then Christians
Look at the lie DC told recorded in my sig.
Lol.
Is this the shark tank?
dcontroversal I can assure you im NOT Petey or SEOCHE either! Despite someone liking my posts.