What should readers conclude when two posters claim they got their position from God, yet they disagree?
1) One of the posters is right and the other is wrong? Which one?
2) Both of the posters are right? How can that be?
3) Both of the posters are wrong? Entirely possible.
I tend to go with number three.
But not having to do with what was said, but the fact that they said it.
If one claims to speak for God they are declaring themselves to be a prophet.
You better be 100 percent sure of what you are saying if you go there.
It is not only them, for everybody that believes in God, and confesses Christ, concerning God's word, says that what they post, and believe is from God, for if they did not think it is coming from God they would not post it.
They are not going to post a post and say this is what I believe, but it is not from God.
Everybody posts what they think is from God, whether it is true or not.
But of course if they are both proclaiming something not in the Bible, but what they say God told them, and they disagree, then someone is wrong, or both wrong.
Sometimes I tend to think both are wrong, for many people like to give them the title of prophet to exalt themselves above the common saint, and say things that they say came from God, which sometimes what they say does not seem true, or they want to believe it is true that popped up in their head, but the flesh was really involved.
A good example of someone wanting to exalt himself above the common saint is a man called William Tapley, who says he is the third eagle, or angel, of the apocalypse, and co-prophet of the end times, and has 1061 videos to date, but his prophesies, and what he believes is crazy, and silly at times.
Anyone that says that about themselves God is not giving them any prophesy, and they will have crazy prophesies, and beliefs, for how can he make a claim that he is the third angel of the apocalypse.
That would seem like the devil could influence him for his arrogance of thinking he is something that he is not by saying that he is the third eagle, angel, of the apocalypse, and co-prophet of the end times, as if he is number two of the prophets on this planet.
I like Paul's attitude when he said that he is the least of the least of the saints, and the Bible says esteem others higher than yourself, and the Pharisees liked people to think they were great men of God to give glory to themselves, which Jesus said they have their reward, for they loved the praises of men more than the praises of God.
God resists the proud but gives grace unto the humble so let us not think we are greater than we are, for God said if you think you are something, when you are nothing, then you deceive yourself.
I like how God said it in the Old Testament that the nations are less than nothing to stress how we are nothing but mere physical matter that God could disassemble back to its original state, and it does not matter if the being is one trillion miles long it is child's play to reduce it from whence it came, broken down.
Who do we think we are that we would say I am great in the eyes of God above the common pew sitter, and lowly saint.
I played the same game back to William Tapley by saying I am the first eagle, angel, of the apocalypse, and the main prophet of the end times, and said that thou is wrong in your claim so respect what I am saying as your master above you, but he was not buying it, lol.
So I suppose we are both wrong so I also go with number 3 in this case.