If by law you mean the 10 commandments, no, the law has been done away without. Without the law there would be no knowledge of sin.
I am not concerned you were. Right here..If you were really concerned about thread interruption, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
See?
Which is the root of our dialog presently.Jesus didn't preach "an eye for an eye". Is that what you were referring to?
Not sure how you got off on a different subject here. This isn't a political thread.
Embankment was the gentleman to which I was speaking. I don't know him from Adam in relation to what he believes. And for your information I have on several occasions talked to Studyman in regards to his responding in like to the ill manner that is prevalent here. And by the way; Sabbatarian? I am a Christian standing in the power and might of Christ through Christ. Your negatively intended label is of the same ill manner to which you were censoring Studyman for....Where are your morals and sense of justice?
Don't you believe in standing up for what is right?
Or only defending your Sabbatarian buddies. Regardless of their bad behavior.
I counted five or six instances of clear abuse. You call it "Censoring".
And then you call the abuser a "gentleman". ???
Sounds like thuggery. (See?) Gangster talk.
Never said that.see, here is the difference - you and the other judeaizers say that we have to keep the letter of the Law, .
The truth still stands in post #375, in spite of your perverted Sabbath gospel, scripture twisting and SDA propagandaVery good; that is correct. The rest of Christ; the Gospel they did not enter due to unbelief. Stiff necked hardhearted disobedience.
Heb 3:13 But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin.
Heb 3:17 But with whom was he grieved forty years? was it not with them that had sinned, whose carcases fell in the wilderness?
Context is clear; but if that is not enough the very word translated Unbelief in chapter 3 and 4 of Hebrews also holds true to this.
It was not that they did not believe. They believed because GOD was physically manifesting HIMSELF to them continuously coming out of Egypt and through the wilderness for 40 years. As the BDAG puts forth in their Lexicon It was an "unwillingness to commit oneself to another or respond positively to the other’s words or actions" This is the, "lack of belief, unbelief" to which Hebrews speaks.
However....
Command? In Hebrews 4:9,10 It is not being spoken as a command but as a matter of fact. The command is found is found earlier in the chapter. Here follow along please.
For we which have believed do enter into rest (Katapausis; ceasing down, Christ's rest; the Gospel), as HE said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest (Katapausis; ceasing down,Christ's rest; the Gospel): although the works were finished from the foundation of the world. (GOD’S rest; the Gospel has been available since the creation of the world) For HE spake in a certain place (Mt. Sinai in the giving of the Commandments) of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works. And in this again (AGAIN HE SPEAKS), IF they shall enter into my rest (Katapausis; ceasing down, the Gospel).
A few things need being mentioned in from these verses. The REST mentioned is referring to the GOSPEL. This brought to light in verse TWO. The giving (speaking) of The Seventh Day and GOD resting on it. And the Seventh Day being brought up again (HE speaks) IF they shall enter into my rest (Katapausis; ceasing down, the Gospel). And incidentally Two separate things are being mentioned. The Rest in which is the GOSPEL and the forth Commandment; Seventh Day which is the Sabbath. Also if I may verse four is rather specific with it's use of definite articles in the Greek.
Here listen to a more direct translation.
Heb 4:4 ....And rested the GOD in the day; the seventh from all the works of HIM.
It is IN THE day; the seventh in which HE spoke about on Mt Sinia. And in that day; the seventh HE rested from all HIS works.
Couple that with the fact Heb 4:5 says And in this again (HE SPEAKS), If they shall enter into my rest. We have repeating of the forth commandment
You glossed right over the definition of the word. Vines as do most cites the definition first. He cites, "a Sabbath-keeping" then goes on to cite the RV's translation, "a Sabbath rest" and then proceeds to show what they have in their marginal notes, "a keeping of a Sabbath". He does this to prove that the difinition that he cited is close to what the translators of the RV thought of the word. So what you have is the definition, references and then commentary.
The commentary is way off. Nothing and I mean nothing in the grammar of the Greek or context even suggests a future rest. Remaineth is present tense, indicative mood; a fact.
Ceases from his own works a s GOD did from HIS in verse 10 is in the Aorist tense.
Most often the Aorist tense is translated past tense by translators. It is not that simple though. Here is an excerpt from the Koine Greek Textbook Vol. 1-4 Greg by Allen Walker.
"The events described by the aorist tense are classified into a number of categories by grammarians. The most common of these include a view of the action as having begun from a certain point ("inceptive aorist"), or having ended at a certain point ("cumulative aorist"), or merely existing at a certain point ("punctiliar aorist"). The categorization of other cases can be found in Greek reference grammars.
The English reader need not concern himself with most of these finer points concerning the aorist tense, since in most cases they cannot be rendered accurately in English translation, being fine points of Greek exegesis only. The common practice of rendering an aorist by a simple English past tense should suffice in most cases."
It is called commentary. Chapter four's Context supports it. Two rests are being mentioned in Hebrews Four. Kataplausis; Christ's rest which is the Gospel. This rest is defined in verse two.
For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.
(Heb 4:2 KJV)
And the second as you know is Sabbatismos; a Sabbath keeping.
So what we have is....
There remaineth therefore a Sabbath keeping to the people of God. For he that is entered into his rest (Christ's rest; the Gospel), he also (in addition to that) hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his.
(Heb 4:9-10)
The only record we have of GOD ceasing from HIS own work is upon completing Creation. God rested from work on the day, the seventh which HE later called the Sabbath. So we who have entered into Christ's Rest; the Gospel cease from our own works as GOD did from HIS on the Day, the Seventh which is the Sabbath.
So you have nothing in relation to the objective facts shared in the post so you responded to but sleights and intended insults?The truth still stands in post #375, in spite of your perverted Sabbath gospel, scripture twisting and SDA propaganda
Objective facts? Yeah right. Once again, the truth still stands in post #375, but believe what you want to believe and Happy Thanksgiving.So you have nothing in relation to the objective facts shared in the post so you responded to but sleights and intended insults?
Wow!
SDA propaganda? I don't post any teachings from any SDA church.
Happy Thanksgiving.
Very good; that is correct. The rest of Christ; the Gospel they did not enter due to unbelief. Stiff necked hardhearted disobedience.
Heb 3:13 But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin.
Heb 3:17 But with whom was he grieved forty years? was it not with them that had sinned, whose carcases fell in the wilderness?
Context is clear; but if that is not enough the very word translated Unbelief in chapter 3 and 4 of Hebrews also holds true to this.
It was not that they did not believe. They believed because GOD was physically manifesting HIMSELF to them continuously coming out of Egypt and through the wilderness for 40 years. As the BDAG puts forth in their Lexicon It was an "unwillingness to commit oneself to another or respond positively to the other’s words or actions" This is the, "lack of belief, unbelief" to which Hebrews speaks.
However....
Command? In Hebrews 4:9,10 It is not being spoken as a command but as a matter of fact. The command is found is found earlier in the chapter. Here follow along please.
For we which have believed do enter into rest (Katapausis; ceasing down, Christ's rest; the Gospel), as HE said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest (Katapausis; ceasing down,Christ's rest; the Gospel): although the works were finished from the foundation of the world. (GOD’S rest; the Gospel has been available since the creation of the world) For HE spake in a certain place (Mt. Sinai in the giving of the Commandments) of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works. And in this again (AGAIN HE SPEAKS), IF they shall enter into my rest (Katapausis; ceasing down, the Gospel).
A few things need being mentioned in from these verses. The REST mentioned is referring to the GOSPEL. This brought to light in verse TWO. The giving (speaking) of The Seventh Day and GOD resting on it. And the Seventh Day being brought up again (HE speaks) IF they shall enter into my rest (Katapausis; ceasing down, the Gospel). And incidentally Two separate things are being mentioned. The Rest in which is the GOSPEL and the forth Commandment; Seventh Day which is the Sabbath. Also if I may verse four is rather specific with it's use of definite articles in the Greek.
Here listen to a more direct translation.
Heb 4:4 ....And rested the GOD in the day; the seventh from all the works of HIM.
It is IN THE day; the seventh in which HE spoke about on Mt Sinia. And in that day; the seventh HE rested from all HIS works.
Couple that with the fact Heb 4:5 says And in this again (HE SPEAKS), If they shall enter into my rest. We have repeating of the forth commandment
You glossed right over the definition of the word. Vines as do most cites the definition first. He cites, "a Sabbath-keeping" then goes on to cite the RV's translation, "a Sabbath rest" and then proceeds to show what they have in their marginal notes, "a keeping of a Sabbath". He does this to prove that the difinition that he cited is close to what the translators of the RV thought of the word. So what you have is the definition, references and then commentary.
The commentary is way off. Nothing and I mean nothing in the grammar of the Greek or context even suggests a future rest. Remaineth is present tense, indicative mood; a fact.
Ceases from his own works a s GOD did from HIS in verse 10 is in the Aorist tense.
Most often the Aorist tense is translated past tense by translators. It is not that simple though. Here is an excerpt from the Koine Greek Textbook Vol. 1-4 Greg by Allen Walker.
"The events described by the aorist tense are classified into a number of categories by grammarians. The most common of these include a view of the action as having begun from a certain point ("inceptive aorist"), or having ended at a certain point ("cumulative aorist"), or merely existing at a certain point ("punctiliar aorist"). The categorization of other cases can be found in Greek reference grammars.
The English reader need not concern himself with most of these finer points concerning the aorist tense, since in most cases they cannot be rendered accurately in English translation, being fine points of Greek exegesis only. The common practice of rendering an aorist by a simple English past tense should suffice in most cases."
It is called commentary. Chapter four's Context supports it. Two rests are being mentioned in Hebrews Four. Kataplausis; Christ's rest which is the Gospel. This rest is defined in verse two.
For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.
(Heb 4:2 KJV)
And the second as you know is Sabbatismos; a Sabbath keeping.
So what we have is....
There remaineth therefore a Sabbath keeping to the people of God. For he that is entered into his rest (Christ's rest; the Gospel), he also (in addition to that) hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his.
(Heb 4:9-10)
The only record we have of GOD ceasing from HIS own work is upon completing Creation. God rested from work on the day, the seventh which HE later called the Sabbath. So we who have entered into Christ's Rest; the Gospel cease from our own works as GOD did from HIS on the Day, the Seventh which is the Sabbath.
Agreed completely but but but there is this in Galations 5 ....Pau asks, shall we sin more so that grace may abound? gOD FORBID.
Ho can a believer sin at all if the law is no more? Sin is breaking the law.
Some, weak in faith, say that they obey the law in the spirit so they are free of the law.
We are not free of the law unless Jesus Chrsist lied, and He did no. We are free of the curse of the law by the Blood of our blessed and innocent Jesus..
Now if we obey the law in spirit, the law yet exists.
Did Jesus ever teach against obeying the law as it stands after His work that changed how we understand? No!
Jesus also taches He did not destroy the law, only the curse of the law, death.
Anyone here who can read and clames to believe Jesus Christ is free to learn directly from Him, from God, just how we obey God since His blessed and wonderful work..
Do you not observe the seventh day as a Sabbath?I am not concerned you were. Right here..
Which is the root of our dialog presently.
Embankment was the gentleman to which I was speaking. I don't know him from Adam in relation to what he believes. And for your information I have on several occasions talked to Studyman in regards to his responding in like to the ill manner that is prevalent here. And by the way; Sabbatarian? I am a Christian standing in the power and might of Christ through Christ. Your negatively intended label is of the same ill manner to which you were censoring Studyman for....
Yet lightbearer “adds” the word “gospel” to Hebrews 4:10 to accommodate his Sabbath keeping gospel agenda when it’s not there. - https://www.biblestudytools.com/lexicons/greek/nas/euaggelion.htmlthe word for Gospel is evangelio. that word does not even appear in Hebrews.
No it means ceasing down; restone more time- the word katapausis does mean Gospel.
Correct in a sense. That is the Noun. It means glad tidings; good news, hence it being used of the Gospel. The verb euaggelizo is there and The translators of the KJV did see that euaggelizo should be translated Gospel due to the context. A few other translations due also.the word for Gospel is evangelio. that word does not even appear in Hebrews.
Yes you or at the very least your words do.so, no, as you said of me elsewhere, I do not bring hate.
You labeled me by calling me a name. And you implied I am a liar and deceitful. Let GOD be the Judge. This is hate speech and does nothing in adding to our discussion. At the worst case scenario it brings discord and ruins any possibility of one even listening to a word you might have to say that would be true and edifying when and if they were the one mistakenly confused in something they are sharing.I just point out you and the other judeaizer's lies and deceit, as I just did here.
Agreed completely but but but there is this in Galations 5 ....
But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law. Now those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. If we live by the Spirit, let us also walk by the Spirit.
Hey, :0, I just got something that I hadn't gotten before. I had been reading this passage wrong for years. I thought it meant if we are filled with these fruits then there is no need for the law. But boy was I off. I think when we are walking the way He intended, those fruits flourish, that when we don't we grieve and quench the spirit. Hmmmm, now my mind is pondering. His word is so Good.
Galatians must be read in context.Galatians 2:21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
How can we be given rest from our work at the law if we must work at the law in order to enter Rest????????
This is a bit of circular reasoning in which there is no way out for the judaizer and legalist. There is no such thing as rest from our work at the law for these poor souls.
Galatians 3:10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
No one said what you posted here. Well nothing in any of the posts I posted does.Hebrews 4:10-11
10 For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his.
11 Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.
If we are to believe the judaizers and legalists then entering into Rest is only on saturdays.
But in Galatians we are told that the law is not of Faith.
So in other words you have no real response but accusations and innuendos about people.so, you act like you are defining the word katapausis as the Gospel , then, when pointed out that it does not, you agree, as if you did not try to pass it off like it did.
so, then, ( predictably ) your next play is " the translations are wrong ".
so, you see, here is the thing- I can be honest , and if I am wrong, I admit it. in another thread, studyman, who I dislike much more than I dislike you, pointed out some I said something wrong. I looked, and in that case, I told him I was in error, which I was.
why did I do that? because I care about truth and honesty. and since I accept the truth that the only thing it takes to be saved is faith and trust in the Lord Jesus Christ, I am NOT tying to push a religious system.
you and studyman and the other judeaizrers ARE trying to push a religious system, your fist loyalty is to that system, not to truth and honesty. you count on your system to save you, so, you have to defend it at all costs.
I say the simple truth - believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved.
Amen Grandpa and well said!Hebrews 4:10-11
10 For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his.
11 Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.
If we are to believe the judaizers and legalists then entering into Rest is only on saturdays.
But in Galatians we are told that the law is not of Faith.
So if someone is resting on Saturday they are not doing it by faith, they are doing it because the law says to.
If we have ceased from our work, as God did from His, then we aren't resting only on Saturdays. We are continually resting from all of our work at trying to be Righteous before God.
We aren't looking to the law to prove our righteousness. Because if we do that then we make the Gospel about working at the law and not about Faith in Christ.
Galatians 2:21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
How can we be given rest from our work at the law if we must work at the law in order to enter Rest????????
This is a bit of circular reasoning in which there is no way out for the judaizer and legalist. There is no such thing as rest from our work at the law for these poor souls.
Galatians 3:10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
Well that surely is not Good News. At least not for the legalist and judaizer...
Worse yet someone else who claims Christ thought that your post was useful. Sad.....
Nothing sad or non-useful about the TRUTH found in Acts 16:31 - Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved..I say the simple truth - believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved.
Amen, if only they could get this simple truthHebrews 4:10-11
10 For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his.
11 Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.
If we are to believe the judaizers and legalists then entering into Rest is only on saturdays.
But in Galatians we are told that the law is not of Faith.
So if someone is resting on Saturday they are not doing it by faith, they are doing it because the law says to.
If we have ceased from our work, as God did from His, then we aren't resting only on Saturdays. We are continually resting from all of our work at trying to be Righteous before God.
We aren't looking to the law to prove our righteousness. Because if we do that then we make the Gospel about working at the law and not about Faith in Christ.
Galatians 2:21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
How can we be given rest from our work at the law if we must work at the law in order to enter Rest????????
This is a bit of circular reasoning in which there is no way out for the judaizer and legalist. There is no such thing as rest from our work at the law for these poor souls.
Galatians 3:10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
Well that surely is not Good News. At least not for the legalist and judaizer...
Amen that is a fact!Nothing sad or non-useful about the TRUTH found in Acts 16:31 - Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved..
What is sad is rejecting Paul's message, twisting the scriptures and teaching salvation by "grace plus law, faith plus works."
So that is why it was posted; to quote, "So in other words you have no real response but accusations and innuendos about people.so, you act like you are defining the word katapausis as the Gospel , then, when pointed out that it does not, you agree, as if you did not try to pass it off like it did.
so, then, ( predictably ) your next play is " the translations are wrong ".
so, you see, here is the thing- I can be honest , and if I am wrong, I admit it. in another thread, studyman, who I dislike much more than I dislike you, pointed out some I said something wrong. I looked, and in that case, I told him I was in error, which I was.
why did I do that? because I care about truth and honesty. and since I accept the truth that the only thing it takes to be saved is faith and trust in the Lord Jesus Christ, I am NOT tying to push a religious system.
you and studyman and the other judeaizrers ARE trying to push a religious system, your fist loyalty is to that system, not to truth and honesty. you count on your system to save you, so, you have to defend it at all costs.
.