Yes I believe faith and personal relationship with Jesus is the most important thing above all and that baptism is done after people have faith. If you place your faith in Christ in a desert with no water present; are you still saved? I say yes. Ephesians 1:13 says we are sealed with the Holy Spirit when we believed. But if you are in a situation where you profess faith in Christ, and baptism is offered to you, and shown to you from the Scriptures and you refuse that, that is like rejecting the covenant and something is definately wrong. Similar to how circumcision worked in the O.T. I believe God works in covenants. The genuinely born again have a desire to be baptized and to serve the Lord.
Hi,
You said in a previous post that the moment someone places their faith in Jesus then they should be baptised straight away.
That I totally agree with.
We are saved by grace through faith.
I have embolded the above because if you don't mind it's something I wish to touch on.
To refuse baptism is not necessarily rejecting the covenant but if so then something is wrong.
Firstly in today's church baptism does not happen straight away.
If someone responds to the Gospel with genuine belief baptism is not even addressed.
In today's church there are caveats added before you can be baptised.
A simple thing like giving a great testimony.
Some don't have a great testimony, so they back off.
Some are frightened to speak in front of many people.
Most churches meet with those who wish to be baptised.
Asked load of questions and if you tick all the boxes then yes they will baptise you.
If no then no.
My pastor at church (a lovely man of God) and I were talking about baptism, as I was asked would I be willing to baptise people.
I think he was fishing in terms of my thoughts on why and when.
Like you I said straight away, because they believe, per Romans 10:9
I said "I genuinely believe it's a spiritual marker.
He then relayed to me how someone came to Jesus and had a drug problem.
He asked to be baptised and my pastor was resistant to do so cause he was still struggling with drugs.
God said to him "Baptise him, he has placed faith in Jesus"
So he did so. The guy had a spliff in the morning, when he rose from the water he has never done drugs since.
Now he may have still struggled with it afterwards but if we knew he would, is that a reason not to baptise? NO ITS NOT.
I spent time with someone who wouldn't get baptised because he felt he was not good enough, he sinned to much.
Eventually (don't know why it took so long to do so) I read the verses from Romans 10:9 and asked him if he did confess and believe. He said yes.
Then I said that is why you should be baptised.
He was a few weeks later.
I baptised someone who was scared witless about having to give some great testimony, speaking in front of people (my church has about 400 members).
So I said just stand up and confess your faith and that's why you are getting baptised.
That he did.
Alas I rejected someone to be baptised.
When we met I asked him if he had done what is expressed in Romans 10:9
He said no he had not, so I asked him shall we do that now.
He said no. So I had no choice but to say no I can't baptise you, baptism is for belivers.
Sorry gone on a bit.
The point I'm trying to make is that if someone refuses Baptism they are not necessarily rejecting the covenant.
You said even if they are shown scripture, that depends also on what scripture they are quoted.
Some churches today will not baptise people because they are not members.
Maybe the church is the issue and not the people.
As I said, I believe Baptism is a spiritual marker.
That is why Muslims will not persue a fellow Muslim who comes to Jesus and it's baptised (as a Muslim friend told me)