Did Jesus Have The Human Sinful Nature?
- Thread starter DevotiontoBible
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
How am I in error of interepreting the doctrine of original sin?
You are saying Jesus was in the "likeness" of man but not that he actually was man just like we are not God. You are a Docetic heretic then. You need to rethink your position.
P
pjharrison
Guest
You are following Catholic doctrine and Jehovah's witness doctrine. Their doctrine make Jesus an ordinary man and not God. Your saying the son of God, but your also making him Mary's physical son. She just raised him from a baby. She is his mother, but not biologically. Jesus came to save every one, so is doesn't really make too much difference that he came from that lineage, because all others can be grafted in. It seems like you are on the other side
Actually, it is AOG theology.You are following Catholic doctrine and Jehovah's witness doctrine. Their doctrine make Jesus an ordinary man and not God. Your saying the son of God, but your also making him Mary's physical son. She just raised him from a baby. She is his mother, but not biologically. Jesus came to save every one, so is doesn't really make too much difference that he came from that lineage, because all others can be grafted in. It seems like you are on the other side
Is that the bible your church uses, or the one that they quote in the AOG study you're regurgitating?
God who remains without nature a beginning of day, is supernatural ..
Men are still trying to make God, not seen, into a man, seen. The evil generation, natural unconverted man that seeks after the things seen before they will beleive, commit faith .
God is not a man as us having a nature and nether is there any fleshly as that seen infallible mediator as a interpreter between God, not seen and man seen between God, as a infallible umpire in which the scriptures calls a daysman and Catholicism calls a Pope .
The Son of man, Jesus as that seen when called "good master" knowing only God not seen is good gave glory to God not seen . God not seen is our master, teaching authority. In that way just as we are to call no man father on earth, the same applies to teacher .We are brother and sisters.. not masters .
For he is not a man, as I am, that I should answer him, and we should come together in judgment. Neither is there any daysman betwixt us, that might lay his hand upon us both. Job 9:32-33
Men are still trying to make God, not seen, into a man, seen. The evil generation, natural unconverted man that seeks after the things seen before they will beleive, commit faith .
God is not a man as us having a nature and nether is there any fleshly as that seen infallible mediator as a interpreter between God, not seen and man seen between God, as a infallible umpire in which the scriptures calls a daysman and Catholicism calls a Pope .
The Son of man, Jesus as that seen when called "good master" knowing only God not seen is good gave glory to God not seen . God not seen is our master, teaching authority. In that way just as we are to call no man father on earth, the same applies to teacher .We are brother and sisters.. not masters .
For he is not a man, as I am, that I should answer him, and we should come together in judgment. Neither is there any daysman betwixt us, that might lay his hand upon us both. Job 9:32-33
Can't you think of anything of substance to add to the discussion?
You mutilated the orthodox understanding of the hypostatic union, especially adding in your last phrase comparing His humanity to us not being God. Jesus was very man, of very man. He was 100% man, not like a man. You need to think about what you are writing.
P
pjharrison
Guest
Like I said you're a troll. I never said what you said I said. I have no idea what you're trying to accomplish with your hard-headed, stiff-necked way of having a discussion.
I guess I'll have to spell it out for someone who uses a bible made for children.
Jesus being made in the likeness of sinful flesh doesn't mean that he was made sinful flesh, just like man being made in the likeness of GOD doesn't mean that he was made GOD.
Do you get it now?
Then the Bible is your enemy since it clearly states:
Therefore, it was necessary for him to be made in every respect like us, his brothers and sisters, so that he could be our merciful and faithful High Priest before God. Then he could offer a sacrifice that would take away the sins of the people.
Hebrews 2:17 NLT
https://bible.com/bible/116/heb.2.17.NLT
P
pjharrison
Guest
Do you prefer this Bible?:
Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.
Hebrews 2:17 KJV
https://bible.com/bible/1/heb.2.17.KJV