Asserting something significant such as the idea that 1 Timothy was not written by Paul, without providing evidence when asked to do so, suggests that you don't have good evidence. Put up, or shut up, as the saying goes. Claiming that you are "just stating facts" is irrelevant when said "facts" have not been established as such.
By the way, the word you deem to be spelled "dam" is actually spelled "damn".
Dude, you want me to go through the whole list of Scolars an sources and redact all the connections?
There are books and many free essays that go into very minute detail on these topics.
Take my reference and look it up for yourself, you will find ample evidence in light of my claim. Historians and other scholars have done all the leg work.
The only reason why they are not "facts" is because the church would be offended and we all know that the church is a conglomerate entity that protects its own self best interests.
Take my reference, look it up, read a few essays, maybe a book or 2 and then make your decision.
No way I can write a post. It would be a book.