P
pjharrison
Guest
okay. Good enough.I'm covered by the blood of Jesus Christ.
okay. Good enough.I'm covered by the blood of Jesus Christ.
If you walk in LOVE and obedience to the Word. If you do not do these two things you step out from under that covering. You step into the darkness where the monsters live.I'm covered by the blood of Jesus Christ.
It's not a physical hat. The man must not put a religious spirit between him and Christ. If he does his is under a religious spirit not Christ.Look at it in context....It talks of the man first....A man covers his head he brings shame. Every man who prays or prophesies wearing something down over his head brings shame to his head, A physical HAT....Then the woman. All of a sudden that's spiritual covering....That is NOT what Paul is talking about...He's talking about a physical covering.
The hair represents a spiritual covering. The man gets his from Christ. And woman since she was made for man, gets hers spiritual covering from man.Sure... and spiritual hair in verse 15.
Rofl...
Well sir...God allows you to believe what you want...Its your freedom of choice that He gave you.....Really though...It makes more sense to believe His Word as He says it...And to not tell Him what He means when He talks.It's not a physical hat. The man must not put a religious spirit between him and Christ. If he does his is under a religious spirit not Christ.
Christ is the head of the man. Christ is not a hat. He's spirit.
The hair represents a spiritual covering. The man gets his from Christ. And woman since she was made for man, gets hers spiritual covering from man.
Sorry if it upsets you. what you are saying is that a hat will protect women from the devils schemes. In that case what kind of amour is Jesus telling us to put on, when he says put on the full armor of God.Well sir...God allows you to believe what you want...Its your freedom of choice that He gave you.....Really though...It makes more sense to believe His Word as He says it...And to not tell Him what He means when He talks.
Why would I be upset? Believe me, I'm not. But I am saying that you won't get anywhere telling God what He means when He talks.Sorry if it upsets you. what you are saying is that a hat will protect women from the devils schemes. In that case what kind of amour is Jesus telling us to put on, when he says put on the full armor of God.
You din' answer the question, and I'm not a sirWhy would I be upset? Believe me, I'm not. But I am saying that you won't get anywhere telling God what He means when He talks.
Sorry if it upsets you. what you are saying is that a hat will protect women from the devils schemes. In that case what kind of amour is Jesus telling us to put on, when he says put on the full armor of God.
okay. I will leave you with that.What I am saying is what I've already said. A head covering for the woman is to show that she is under authority. And that is because of the angels
Well if you have a problem with wearing hats in church read on. Paul says clearly that we don't bother with such thingsokay. I will leave you with that.
Well 1 Timothy is like the leading scripture for this. It has been deemed a forgery among scholars, but of course, Christians don't care about facts or history, unless it is convenient for them.
It wasn't just one "genius", and you don't have to give a "dam". I am just stating facts. Some of the pastoral epistles are the easiest to debunk. Tradition is the only thing that maintains their "validity". Historically, they have been proven to not have been written by Paul. By definition, that is a forgery.And who was the genius that decided it is a forgery? And why should I give a deem what he thinks?
It wasn't just one "genius", and you don't have to give a "dam". I am just stating facts. Some of the pastoral epistles are the easiest to debunk. Tradition is the only thing that maintains their "validity". Historically, they have been proven to not have been written by Paul. By definition, that is a forgery.
Dude, you want me to go through the whole list of Scolars an sources and redact all the connections?Asserting something significant such as the idea that 1 Timothy was not written by Paul, without providing evidence when asked to do so, suggests that you don't have good evidence. Put up, or shut up, as the saying goes. Claiming that you are "just stating facts" is irrelevant when said "facts" have not been established as such.
By the way, the word you deem to be spelled "dam" is actually spelled "damn".
Just wondering, do you really have a Dino?Asserting something significant such as the idea that 1 Timothy was not written by Paul, without providing evidence when asked to do so, suggests that you don't have good evidence. Put up, or shut up, as the saying goes. Claiming that you are "just stating facts" is irrelevant when said "facts" have not been established as such.
By the way, the word you deem to be spelled "dam" is actually spelled "damn".