Tongues is God brining new prophecy (the word of God) in other understandable languages other than Hebrew alone.
Tongues is not prophecy, and prophecy is not tongues. Why do you keep repeating this error?
Tongues is God brining new prophecy (the word of God) in other understandable languages other than Hebrew alone.
What Philip's daughters prophesied is not recorded in Scripture, as I have stated at least three times.
No, according to 1 Corinthians 12 and 14.
What is the context of the prophecy not recorded in the word of God ?Is the sky the limit just believe something?
Tongues is not prophecy, and prophecy is not tongues. Why do you keep repeating this error?
If it not recorded why mention it? Does it reveal a law by which we could know God more adequately. Why go above that which is written. What's missing from the book of prophecy (the Bible) ?
Read it for yourself. The primary example is in Acts 21.
The truth does not change . What is prophecy in respect to Christ? What does it mean to prophecy if not to declare prophecy , God's word?
I would encourage you to try to follow the argument. Because the prophecies given by Philip's daughters are not recorded in Scripture, it is established that not all prophecy is Scripture. Therefore, it is possible that God would continue to give prophecy today with no intent to add to Scripture.
And the same man had four daughters, virgins, which did prophesy.Acts 21:L9
Ok I read it they did prophesy (declared the living word of God ) Its what prophets do declare the gospel. Its what you what doing.
Big difference between prophecy (the word of God) and prophecy (declare the word of God ) We should be careful on how we hear God or the seed could be snatched.
The Holy Spirit does not lead you into unfruitful prayer. The Holy Spirit is a revealer of truth and knowledge. The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of truth.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
So if all Philip's daughters did when "prophesying" is "declaring the gospel", what was Agabus doing two verses later? Declaring the gospel? No. He was declaring the future in a very specific context, and it was not "good news"!
Prophesying cannot mean "declaring the gospel" in verse 9, and something quite different two verses later. That is unsupportable.
You are making this up. Nothing in the chapter suggests that praying in an unknown tongue is an activity that produces anything fruitful in the Christian life.Shrume addressed this at length, but I'll add one point...
1 Cor 14:14 (NASB) says, "For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my mind is unfruitful."
It doesn't say the prayer is unfruitful, and you are interpreting "unfruitful" to mean "useless". I suggest you consider an alternate meaning which I believe fits the context better: "disengaged". Other translations say, "unproductive".
If only my spirit prays, my mind is disengaged. (Paul goes on...) So I will pray with my spirit and I will pray with the mind (thereby engaging it) .
LOL I give you scripture and all you can do is blame me for what Gods word says.and you know if my prayers are fruitful or unfruitful?
of for sure the Holy Spirit leads us into truth but it seems some folks either don't care to listen or think God messed up with some parts of the NT
the Holy Spirit is not YOUR personal truth. your anti tongues bias is YOUR personal truth
LOL I give you scripture and all you can do is blame me for what Gods word says.
You have yourself convinced that you are correct. Scripture does not support your position.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
So if all Philip's daughters did when "prophesying" is "declaring the gospel", what was Agabus doing two verses later? Declaring the gospel? No. He was declaring the future in a very specific context, and it was not "good news"!
Prophesying cannot mean "declaring the gospel" in verse 9, and something quite different two verses later. That is unsupportable.
again... do you know if my prayers are fruitful or unfruitful?
If you asked this question in a language that you don't understand, could you rightly say that you're question is fruitful ?