False and a total contradiction......not what James teaches either......no matter how you slice and dice the above is a works based salvation.......and totally denies the truth that those who have been saved by faith have done the work of the Heavenly Father......
What good works did the thief on the cross do....NOT ONE!
Nor was he saved before the cross
Nor was he immersed
Nor did he quote the "Roman Road"
Nor was he a member of a church or had religious affiliation
He was a murderer and a thief being put to death for his crimes
a. He acknowledged his guilt
b. He acknowledged the innocence of Christ
c. He acknowledged the Lordship of Christ and his coming kingdom
He had SAVING faith without ONE DEED, WORK or IMMERSION
Your view is false, leads people astray, binds the hands of men under a false religious creed and is not of God.
THEREFORE, we conclude that a man is justified WITHOUT the deeds/works of the law. <---THIS verse alone contradicts the bolded fallacy in your above quote.
How do you know that the thief on the cross was not saved before the cross, as hundreds of people were baptized by Jesus's disciples while Jesus looked on? He could have been 1 of them that believed.
How do you know that the thief was never immersed, as hundreds of people were baptized by Jesus's disciples while Jesus looked on? He could have been 1 of them that believed.
I don't know what the "Roman Road" is.
How do you know that the thief was not a member of a church or had religious affiliation? There were hundreds of people that were baptized by Jesus's disciples as Jesus looked on. He could have been a believer, been baptized and was a member of the fledgling Christian church.
The bible talks about the thief, but in the 4 gospels never mentions that he was a murderer. Matthew said he was a thief, Mark say he was a thief, Luke said he was a malefactor, and John said he was an 'other'. So did you say he was a murderer to make him look more deviant than he really was or did someone in the NT say he was a murderer?
The thief did acknowledge his guilt.
The thief did acknowledge the innocence of Christ.
The theif did acknowledge that Jesus was the Lord. Is it possible he had prior knowledge of the Lord and his disciples, and believed and was baptized?
The bible is silent in regards to his faith, deeds, works, or immersion. You must also be silent.
Therefore it would be presumptuous on your part to come to any conclusions because of what you think the thief's life experience was.